Please let me know where we need to assign transaction to WEB UI data in SAP OER.
Please let me know where we need to assign transaction to WEB UI data in SAP OER.
When I queried a delivery document in Aii Cockpit got an message at the item details Tab as"Tab Hidden by Personalization", Please do you know what would be the root cause.
After SAP launched SAP Advanced Track and Trace for Pharmaceuticals (or "ATTP" as it is now called in the market) in September, we always got the same question from our customers: "Can you integrate to my packaging line vendor?" While we could answer this question easily with a big "Yes, of course!", this was still all theory. Even though we put a lot of effort into understanding the detailed requirements from our co-innovation customers, and defining open web-services to integrate with packaging line systems, we were still waiting for a real line system to be physically connected in a real project.
Now two of our partners did that step and integrated ATTP with an Optel Vision line system. Together, Movilitas and Optel Vision demoed this integration during their opening of their new joined demo facility in Frankfurt ( Press Release ). In a nice demo both the automated serialization unit as well as the manual case packing station were connected to Advanced Track & Trace, requesting serial numbers and reporting commissioned data back. Consumption of raw serial numbers as well as the hierarchy of the case could be reviewed and the messages were monitored.
So, congratulations for the first partners to be "ATTP ready"....And there are more to come!
Since we released SAP Advanced Track and Trace for Pharmaceuticals on September 15th, I had numerous discussions with customers about how to get there, what would come next and especially how to derive value out of the current track and trace efforts. Even though the main target is compliance right now, at the end everybody tries to understand where additional value can be derived which is understandable given the enormous cost of packaging line equipment, changes in warehouse operations and IT infrastructure. So what did you actually get for your Dollars (or Euros, Swiss Francs, Danish Krona or British Pounds for that matter). Did your company already realize any additional value beyond compliance and is there more to achieve?
One interesting aspect that customer shared at last year’s Movilitas “We track” Conference was the fact that their final overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) for a pure-serialization line (i.e.no aggregation in that line) was up from the values before serialization. That customer reported a dramatic dip in OEE initially but once all the little (and larger) issues have been solved, OEE was higher than before. This may be a result of the intensive work on the packaging line, where a lot of the small issues that were not transparent before became visible and had to be tackled for printing and scanning to work properly on the line.. Now, once all those have been solved, the machine could run at higher OEE. However, no customer reported a higher OEE for a line that covers aggregation steps. So as a result we can assume that OEE can stay at current levels or may even slightly increase for serialization only but will go down if aggregation is added. So no additional value to be harvested here!
Even though the different national legislations have been put in place to enable track & trace throughout the supply chain to increase drug safety in the first place, they may also positively impact your ability to track products within the company. With serialized barcodes printed and aggregations stored in a central repository, companies can monitor internal product movements much easier on a much more granular level. And those product movements can span the world very much like external shipments. The ability to uniquely identify a single unit of finished product together with the exact information where this unit is at any point in time may allow much better cold-chain monitoring and provide ad-hoc visibility into the critical supply chain of narcotics as well as extremely expensive products. These benefits may lead to the decision to include aggregation even for products where this is not legally required. However that has to be evaluated against the dip in OEE as discussed above.
Even if pharmaceuticals world-wide were tracked and traced without gap (which is not the case in most markets anyhow), this would not necessarily increase your external supply chain visibility. To a large extend this is due to the fact that you don’t own the data and / or have no right to use them. In today’s pharma supply chains, the dispensers have the most granular level of data. This is the place where demand becomes visible and that’s why companies like IMS made it a business to crunch these data, mask them and sell them to the Pharma companies. This even has been cemented in some markets through the setup e.g. of the national databases in Europe where the pharmacy view is physically separated from the manufacturers database. The same holds true for the US market where data are sent along the supply chain. As a manufacturer you gain no visibility in the supply chain at all. Even in the final stage of the US legislation with full track and trace being mandated by 2023, manufacturers will not have an unobstructed view on their downstream supply chain. Manufacturers may gain some insights from returns, but the vast volumes will not be traceable for the manufacturer for the same reason: no access to data unless the wholesalers share them.
One monetary benefit that companies may be able to realize would result from the ability to selectively recall products. Imagine a pallet of a finished product that wasn’t cooled properly at some point in the supply chain and therefore the product was severely damaged. You would expect returns that would come in once the product reaches the point-of-dispense and even consumers. Today manufactures have no choice other than to recall the entire batch. In a world where products are serialized and aggregations are known, you can pinpoint the pallet where all returned products were shipped on and therefore could recall all units from this pallet. However, most national systems currently do not support this. This would require some changes, e.g. in the definition of messages for the European Hub which currently supports batch recalls only.
One more process that may see a change is that of chargeback claims which is especially important in the US market. Wholesalers request chargebacks from their suppliers as they are forced to sell below their purchase price due to contracts between marketing authorization holders (MAHs) and group purchasing organizations (GPOs) representing the various dispensers. The validation of the chargeback claims at the wholesaler poses a significant effort and duplicates cannot always be avoided at the wholesaler and may not be detected at the manufacturer. In addition it is hard to pinpoint the exact price at which a certain unit was sold to the wholesaler as prices may vary over time. In the future manufacturers may require wholesalers to send the serial numbers with the chargeback request, thus avoiding duplicates altogether and allowing determining the exact price at which the product was sold.
It is still very much a mystery how to retrieve real value from the investements made into serialization and track & trace. Maybe the scenarios mentioned above materialize, maybe not. I wold be interested to hear your comments.
To always stay on top of latest developments and best practices on track and tracea in Life Sciences, watch out for the next blog! Please also feel free to approach us and to follow us on @SAP_Healthcare. We very much look forward to hearing from you, soon!
Dear Fellow Industry Friends,
Just want to share a thought and trying to see if we can spread the word.
Looking at how SAP is positioning HANA within the Life Science industry, it is mainly focusing on R&D and possibilities to speed up the Clinical Trial process.
Very important topics, but I haven't seen a lot about faster and precise recall with the help of SAP GBT with or without HANA. This functionality, in combination with SAP ERP can really provide a safer place for patients/ consumers.
We are working with SAP GBT for some time now and I honestly think we can make a huge difference in the market for trace-ability and precise recall.
Any thoughts on how we can spread the gospel of SAP GBT for the Life Science market as a life saver?
With the kindest regards,
The Life Sciences industry is changing dramatically, for many reasons. Not only patent expirations are a driving force behind this. The needs from patients and care providers are rapidly evolving. For example, patients are hyper-connected to the internet and to one another. According to a survey by McKinsey in 2014, more than 75% of all patients expect to use digital services in the future, as long as those services meet their needs and provide the level of quality they expect. At the same time, scientific complexity is also increasing. Chronic diseases will continue to be hard to tackle, and due to ageing populations and other factors, as per WHO deaths by chronic diseases are projected to reach 52 million annually 2030. Further, there are also other incurable diseases, populations are ageing, globalization is unstoppable, and more and more countries are moving towards healthcare reforms that pay per outcomes, i.e. they will start reimburse according to the efficacy of a therapy.
In the face of these trends, true transformation will not come from smaller incremental improvements, but rather from finding innovative ways to do things fundamentally differently. The game has already started. Here just a few of many possible examples of front-runners:
There are of course a lot of more life sciences companies that have developed astonishing innovation. Other examples than personalized medicine, precise manufacturing, or connected health include bionic 3D-printing, artificial intelligence built into medical devices, as well as much smarter collaboration across the life sciences value chain. Behind the scenes, market leaders not only in pharma, medical devices, and biotech, but also from consumer products, high tech and other industries are researching on the next breakthrough business model that could change the landscape in life sciences.
What are your competitive advantages today, and how could latest business and technology trends disrupt them? What major challenges are you currently facing, and how might new technologies help you solve them?
Join the conversation on Twitter on @SAP_Healthcare and watch out for the hashtag #SAPDigital-LS-Enterprise. Last not least, read the blog by accenture which summarizes the SAP Digital Life Sciences Enterprise event which took place on September 22, 2015 in Princeton, New Jersey.
Title: Healthcare Providers Urgently Drive the Open- SCS Initiative as a Serialization Compliance Solution
September 3, 2015: 10:00 AM EST USA, 4:00 PM CET
The Open-SCS was formed by distinguished group of founding members: Abbott, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Famar Health Care Services, Mylan Pharmaceutical, NNEPharmaplan, SAP AG, OptelVision Inc., Systech International, Werum IT Solutions GmbH, and Antares Vision Srl.
Open-SCS (www. opcfoundation.org/open-scs) operates as an OPC Foundation partner as a chartered working group evolving relationships with GS1, Rx-360, ISA and ISPE to accelerate work product releases in months and not years. With all healthcare providers and vendors
working together, the Open-SCS provides the right track with their new standard and implementation specifications by the end of 2015.
Join us on LinkedIn: Open Serialization Communication Standard Group (Open-SCS)
Contact for program scope and operations questions:
Charlie Gifford, Executive Director, Open-SCS
Charlie.firstname.lastname@example.org, +1 208-309-0990
Contact for a Member Subscription Program:
Thomas J. Burke, President, OPC Foundation
email@example.com , +1 330-357-8013
About The OPC Foundation
Since 1996, the OPC Foundation has facilitated the development and adoption of the OPC information exchange standards. As both advocate and custodian of these specifications, the Foundation’s mission is to help industry vendors, end-users, and software developers maintain interoperability in their manufacturing and automation assets. The OPC Foundation is dedicated to providing the best specifications, technology, process and certification to achieve multivendor, multiplatform, secure, reliable interoperability in industrial automation and related domains. The organization serves over 440 members worldwide in the Industrial Automation, IT, IoT, Building Automation, Oil & Gas and Smart Energy sectors. For more information about the OPC Foundation, please visit
Internet of Things (IoT), health wearables and health apps can undoubtedly improve the collaboration between physicians, patients and payers. Sensors can continuously measure body traits such as blood sugar, body weight, electrodermal activities of the skin, heart beats, and many others, and transfer them to doctors and patients in real time. This can enable new therapy approaches for illnesses like diabetes, depressions, cardiovascular diseases and many others.
Faster, Better Patient Care
If doctors and patients detect unexpected trends – be it because a therapy does not show the efficacy as intended, or be it that the patient was not able to change behavior towards a healthier lifestyle, they can intervene immediately rather than waiting for the next regular appointment weeks or months later. The opportunity goes beyond increased transparency: Technology can send alerts, and you could also imagine that intelligent algorithms will recommend the right actions to get back on track.
Outcome-Based Payments in Healthcare
Health wearables can also trigger new opportunities to develop outcome-based payment models in healthcare. The collected data not only documents therapy adherence by the patient. It also shows if specific indicators have improved or worsened. In other words, if the key parameters measured by health devices and analyzed by IoT-technology improve as predicted or exceed expectations after the patient has taken the drug in the correct way, payers can be sure they invest in the right therapy. Even in the opposite case, doctors and patients get the ability to adjust therapies more quickly and flexibly than without this technology.
More Opportunities for R&D in Precision Medicine
All this can be taken one step further. If scientists are provided with the aggregated and anonymized data that has been collected by health wearables, they will have a much broader statistical base than before. They can slice and dice the data points in new wys and find new therapies that are tailored for specific patient populations. As a result, the individual preconditions of each single patient can be considered during the choice of a therapy much better than before.
A Push for Life Sciences Companies to Engage More Strongly in Prevention
Connected care can also provide an enhancement for life sciences companies to add value for doctors, payers and patients for prevention. They can just use the whole concept, but encourage starting measuring health indicators at a formally healthy person that is at risk to get a disease. One example of a life sciences company that steered competencies strongly into prevention of diabetes is Roche Diabetes Care with Accu-Chek. They offer a connected care package that measures steps, glucose levels in blood, and weight not only with the objective to manage diabetes better, but also to avoid diabetes through positive behavioral changes such as more exercise and healthier nutrition.
Data Privacy: A Show Stopper?
Data privacy is key to enable the main precondition to make it all work: trust from all players, especially doctors and patients, is needed before they participate and share data. It seems that optimism about the potential advantages are higher than concerns on data security risk. According to a study by The Economist Intelligence Unit in 23 countries, 79% of healthcare executives say that mobile technologies including health wearables provide education and information today already, while 50% believe that mobile health will help patients to proactively participate in their own care. McKinsey found out that more than 75% of patients expect to use digital services in the future.
What do you think about IoT in health sciences, connected care and patient engagement? Please join the discussion in the comment field below and on twitter @SAP_Healthcare!
These are exciting times for SAP Life Sciences. SAP will be releasing our “next generation” product that is specifically designed to enable compliance to global pharmaceutical serialization regulations that can scale to address the massive volumes that will be generated from unit level serialization, provide “out of the box” country reporting to global agencies and seamlessly integrate the contract manufacturers and packagers into the end to end process. In my previous blog “The Rapidly Changing World of Serialization in Life Sciences” I discussed how the evolving legislative landscape was creating a complex business environment to meet the global requirements. Because of the overwhelming positive customer feedback and validation on our new product release we are very excited. We believe the solution that we developed with our 14 co-innovation customers is very strong and will meet and exceed both the regulatory requirements but also our customer expectations as an outstanding solution for the industry.
Fast Forward to 2017 – Moving Beyond Compliance
With that in mind, let’s move the clock forward to 2017 when customers have deployed the SAP solution, I’m not able to use the product name until its official launch on September 15th, and the market now has serialized products located across the pharmaceutical value chain. Compliance is no longer a concern as the process is working smoothly and the industry now has near real time visibility into millions of serialized products moving across the value chain every day. Is your company aware that they have a new treasure of data they can leverage to create incremental value? And, if so, what will they do to leverage it?
For example, the pharmaceutical industry has one of the most complicated sales contract processes of any industry in the world. Manufacturers create complex agreements with group purchasing organizations and wholesalers that leverage chargebacks and rebates against a variety of performance metrics. As has been the case for years, wholesalers will continue to submit EDI documents listing millions of line item shipments that require a chargeback or rebate reimbursement.
In the new world of serialized inventory, all claims from the wholesaler to the manufacturer will reference the individual serial number in the electronic document that can be tracked and validated by the manufacturer. This is a critical change in the flow as now the manufacturers can validate a variety of criteria including:
Putting the Finger on Product Counterfeits and Parallel Trade
As manufacturers begin to answer these questions, they will start to unlock tremendous opportunities to not only protect patients and their brand while generating tremendous value for the organization. Clearly, if the serial number is not valid they could have identified counterfeit product and they can respond quickly to minimize any impact on patient safety. If the wholesaler never purchased the serialized product from the manufacturer, they could have bought the product from the “grey” market, or they could have transacted with another wholesaler who is diverting product from one market to another in a parallel trade scenario. In the past, organizations would not have been able to react in near real time based on the validity of the serial number let alone take action to quickly to stop these activities before they become costly problems that could injure patients as well as the corporate brand.
Accelerating the Process with Wholesalers: A Win-Win
Further, the serial number becomes a validation point on any chargeback or rebate and the serial number can only be processed once. This is especially important as the EDI documents can have very large numbers of line items that could result in between 10% to 50% of annual revenue flowing back to the wholesaler in reimbursement. An organization’s ability to quickly and accurately validate the processing of that information and eliminate duplicate chargeback and/or rebate entries will result in significant savings for pharmaceutical manufacturers.
It is clear that as we begin to move across the finish line on serialization compliance we need to shift gears and start to think about how we can leverage this new information in ways that could provide tremendous value to the manufacturers, wholesalers, physicians and patients. Please feel free to comment on any use cases that your organizations are evaluating to leverage the serial number visibility and drive value for your organizations, and to discuss with us on SAP for Life Sciences on SAP Customer Network (SNC) or on Twitter at @SAP_Healthcare .
Where is the life sciences industry heading for?
Last week, I had the pleasure to attend the German SAP Life Sciences Infoday kindly held at the facilities of Boehringer Ingelheim. It was packed with trending topics. Here are my personal highlights from the event.
Hot Topic #1: Big Data Everywhere: in Manufacturing, R&D, Finance, Marketing
In-memory technology seems to be the key for the future of Life Sciences. In almost every discussion, new scenarios and business models enabled by real-time interactions came up. Some examples:
1. Life Sciences R&D: Big Data in Life Sciences R&D seems to be a natural fit.
It can help navigate through multiple data models to filter the right data in clinical studies. Often, a multitude of applications are used for clinical trial analysis – which consumes valuable time. One report can take up to four weeks due to validation of computerized systems. Processing all the different data formats in one platform can save all this time and allow for real-time reporting and prototyping.
Of course in precision medicine and in personalized medicine, the ability to work intelligently with Big Data is key. The majority of health data including genomic or proteomic data, images, medical publications, doctor letters, is unstructured. As a result, in many cases a lot of valuable data that could unveil new insights stays untapped. Big Data tools are able to run sematic researches that take into account different terminologies, analyze graphical data, slice and dice –omics data, and more. The nice thing is that it can also turn any kind of analysis into graphical representations, which are much easier to understand for us. Any kind of peaks become visible immediately and draw our attention to new insights, such as specific mutations in genes responsible for a specific kind of response to a medication.
2. Manufacturing and IoT: The Internet of Things (IoT) will mean a great leap forward for Life Sciences manufacturing. Sensors in machines can monitor and analyze characteristics like pressure or heat, and they immediately can send alerts if any exceptions occur or if limits are exceeded, so that maintenance staff can intervene to prevent any bigger damages or outages. All the data collected by sensors over time can be analyzed through predictive analytics in order to detect signals in even earlier stages, so that any disruptions can be avoided proactively. This technology could also support Continued Process Verification.
3. Precision Marketing: What if a life sciences company could analyze online and social media behavior in real time, sense trends and needs immediately and respond with their campaigns accordingly and timely? This would be actually a win-win, as customers from wholesaler to patient would receive the information they are looking for more quickly, and the brands awareness would increase. Big Data analysis makes it possible, as it can process any amount of data in any formats in real time.
4. New Business Models: One key message at the event was that Big Data analysis does not only mean higher speed and higher precision. It also can open up opportunities for new business models. One concrete example at the event covered SAP HANA Cloud Platform: Roche put an IoT scenario into practice with their connected health package “Accu-Chek” to fight diabetes. Through a smart wrist band and a sensor in their glucose reader, patients can automatically track their health data in a mobile app and connect with their doctors more quickly. Vice versa, doctors can analyze the health status of their patients more precisely and quickly and react accordingly to improve outcomes.
Hot Topic #2: Supply Chain Integrity – More than “Just” Compliance
Supply chain integrity is about patient safety. It’s about us, our children, our neighbors. Any kind of copied drugs or medical devices can bring risks to people’s health – either because there are cheaper hazardous substances contained than in the original, the active ingredient is not contained, faked implants don’t meet safety standards, or because drugs are distributed without complying with Good Distribution Practices – the list can be continued. Legislation and regulation across the globe have been implemented to mitigate this health risk. Not only in order to not only fulfill these requirements, but also in order to save their reputation and public health, Life Sciences companies continue to prioritize supply chain integrity.
Hot Topic #3: Contingent Workforce – It’s Not About Efficiency Only
There was one interesting conversation I would like to share. The question was how contingent workforce can be enables and motivated to work as productively as possible. The advantages of higher flexibility don’t pay off if the contingent workforce is not properly on-boarded, and not continuously trained enough to achieve the top quality levels. Cloud solutions can intensify collaboration between external workers and the hiring company resulting in a win-win situation for both parties: higher performance on the one hand with more identification with the brand and satisfaction for the contingent worker at the same time on the other.
There were many more best practices and discussion points included in the event – this is just a short snapshot. What are your key priorities for LS this year? Please join the conversation in the chat below, or through @SAP_Healthcare on twitter!
Photo credit: “Direction” by Ram Karthik on flickr
Yes, we need to talk about Compliance! In the end, all core business processes in pharmaceuticals, be it procurement, manufacturing, sales or services are impacted by legislation and regulations. In this particular case, compliance even is the main driver behind probably all track & trace projects that are currently being executed in the industry. And even though some companies are already looking beyond pure compliance, trying to figure out how to derive additional value (and I will cover this in Part 3 of this blog-trilogy), the primary goal is to become compliant with the various track & trace regulations.
As mentioned in a previous blog, the legislation to be applied is the one in force in the product’s target market. This means, the target market where a product ends up, determines which regulation actually takes effect; the only exception to this basic rule is India which established legislation for the export of drugs. So it is extremely important to get a good sense of the world wide legislation and to keep eyes and ears open for new emerging ones. So far, Turkey, China, Korea, India and Argentina have active legislation with Brazil being next in Dec. 2015 and the two largest markets following in 2017 (US) and 2018 (EU), respectively. Also look out for news from Saudi, Jordan, Russia and some more… but ultimately it’s a moot point to list them all as they change so quickly. So make sure to connect to your local sales subsidiaries who are dealing with the local legislators anyhow, reach out to service providers in this space or SAP as a matter of fact to get the current details. At SAP, we have established a serialization round table where more than 40 pharma companies meet regularly to exchange news on current and upcoming legislation as well as serialization project details and roadmaps.
All legislation includes a change on the product packaging, at a minimum the application of the serial number. In some markets, like the European Union, additional safety features are required by law, for example to prevent the replacement of the content of a valid package. These changes to the art work of the sales package have to be executed along very elaborated processes within the company and will require approval or reporting to the various authorities. This takes time and processes should be started way in advance.
Also, as serialization, i.e. the application of a unique identification on the product package, is a product attribute required by law, all related processes will become subject of validation in a GxP-sense, e.g. following GAMP standards. So basically all the requirements which are well known in GxP-scenarios like for example Part 11 rules for security, and electronic records, apply (check out the SAP Global ERES Regulations Whitepaper for details). This implies a solid validation plan to be in place for the entire “computerized process” including a potential vendor audit.
The validation of the computerized process will also include a re-validation of the packaging line. In most case, the packaging line will undergo significant reconfiguration changes as additional components like printers and scanners are added. The validation must also include the software connected to printers and scanners and their interface to e.g. SAP solutions for track and trace.
To always stay on top of latest developments and best practices on track and trace in Life Sciences, watch out for the next blog! Please also feel free to approach us and to follow us on @SAP_Healthcare. We very much look forward to hearing from you, soon!
Several years ago I decided it was time for a lifestyle change. I had been a college athlete who, like many of my peers, spent my post college years running, lifting and playing sports to try and stay fit while enjoying some healthy competition. As the years went by, the high imact routine began to take its toll on my body and, although I didn’t have any major injuries, I decided I needed to do something new.
My youngest son introduced me to Bikram yoga in the middle of a cold January several years ago. Bikram yoga, also known as “hot yoga”, effectively translates to yoga in 105 degrees and 40% humidity. The heat is provides warmth to your muscles and, consequently, improves your flexibility as you put yourself thru series of poses that is unlike any workout I’ve done before. After years of practice, I have greater flexibility, eliminated the majority of my chronic body aches and pains and improved my core strength. Not what I would have expected but it seems to work for me.
Interestingly, I see many similarities in my yoga journey to that of the many recent Life Science innovations. Clearly, the patent cliff and decreasing R&D productivity of the 2000’s mandated that things had to change. Fast forward to 2015 and we are beginning to see the initial results of the industry’s early efforts. Personalized medicine continues to progress as researchers and physicians leverage advances in genomic research to identify patient populations who have improved therapeutic outcomes resulting from common genomic footprints. Researchers are using modified HIV cells to successful treat leukemia patients with staggering results. Amgen is demonstrating tremendous potential using a genetically modified form of the polio vaccine to treat brain cancer. Bristol-Myers Squibb’s cancer immunotherapies are teaching the body to kill cancer cells with little or no side effects. Simply stated, these are remarkable innovations as the industry begins to rebuild their R&D momentum.
Further, the chronic body aches and pains of decreasing margins are beginning to ease as the industry is returning to profitability. Although the M&A churning continues keep muscles tense as organizations look for the ideal portfolio of branded, generic and consumer pharmaceutical products while others look to combine drug and devices to provide a unique delivery system that improves the outcome and experience for the patient.
All right, so maybe my yoga analogy isn’t perfect but it is exciting to the see the industry that basically defined the term R&D begin to produce the lifesaving innovations that we have come to expect from them. I look forward to continuing to work with the industry in enabling these and the many other innovations that will change the lives of patients across the globe. Namaste!
Life sciences companies have an extremely high responsibility to make sure that they bring to market drugs and medical devices: they need to be safe, high quality and efficacious. For manufacturing organizations in life sciences, this means they need to focus on risk, quality, and time to market. The Internet of Things (IoT) brings new opportunities for life sciences companies to achieve that.
Photo credit: "Connected" by Michael Josh Villanueva, Jan 2, 2010 on flickr
High quality, high productivity, speed – the IoT makes it all possible
The IoT enables direct machine-to-machine interactions, it can provide real-time detailed insights through sensors, and consequently facilitate remote tracking, monitoring, management and networking. Because of this, the IoT can improve speed and precision of production planning. Direct real time information from product components, batches and machines enables the use of predictive analytics tools to foresee and proactively mitigate quality risk. Similarly, sensor data from machines can trigger insights that can be used to maintain the assets before any failures occur sooner rather than later. All this helps life sciences companies secure patient safety and fulfill their needs timely and efficiently.
Enabling personalized medicine
The most exciting aspect is that the IoT enables efficient manufacturing processes for products used in personalized medicine. The IoT allows plants to produce batch sizes of one, since parts or batches can communicate directly with machines, which then interact with software that concludes the next work orders from this information that the machine directly applies. This video illustrates how it works.
Stronger patient-centricity for medical device companies
For medical device companies, the IoT can increase customer-centricity around customer service and of the product itself. They mostly deal with products that are not only at very high value, but also impact patients’ health. Because medical devices are often used long term, the patient experience with these products should be leading edge. Continuous signals from these devices can be monitored in order to anticipate maintenance needs, proactively initiate processes for service technicians, and/or alert the doctors to act on time before any issues occur. All this sensor information can go back to the manufacturer, which can further help to improve manufacturing processes or to develop a more customer-friendly design. Before, neither the depth and quantity of data nor the technology to deal with Big Data were available to draw these kinds of conclusions.
Not only from a pure product quality point of view, the IoT has great potential for the life sciences industry. It can also improve therapies, the patient experience, and doctor to patient collaboration. Through wearables, body traits can be measured constantly, which enables patients to control their health better, and physicians to adapt therapies according to the patients exact condition. Roche Diagnostics Accu-Chek is one example that points in this direction.
The ability to connect machines, people and processes in real time boosts collaboration like never before. Combined with predictive analytics tools that are able to handle Big Data and to separate valuable pieces of information from the noise, IoT will bring completely new opportunities beyond saving time and increased precision; time will tell!
If you want to discuss with us how SAP solutions can help Life Sciences companies make IoT a reality and benefit from its opportunity today, attend the SAP Manufacturing Industries Forum June 23-25, 2015 in Lombard, IL, USA. View the event brochure to learn more.
On May 6, Bill 276/2015 (Original in brazilian Portuguese) was submitted to the Federal Senate of Brazil that intends to postpone the implementation of the traceability system in Brazil. The bill proposes a staged implementation throughout 10 years counting from January 2015:
In its newsletter dated 13 May, Interfarma, the association of the research-based pharmaceutical industry, has re-iterated that it is "in favor of the traceability, because it is an important step towards a more ethical market with a better protection to patients and fairer competition conditions". Interfarma has offered to support a postponement in view of the "delay of other sectors of the industry and the difficulties of other segments, such as the public sector, distribution, and retailers" to implement the Track&Trace regulation in Brazil along the current timeline. It suggests a revision of the the existing deadlines that would result in the need "to present the first lots only in 2016 or 2017 and the final deadline would be 2018". The association has emphasized the goal to implement traceability in the shortest possible time frame and therefore has refused to support the request of the other sectors of the pharmaceutical chain to get a 10-year postponement.
Patients’ needs around the world sound pretty simple: they need best therapy outcomes, the right drugs and devices at the right time, and the costs to be covered by payers or at least be affordable.
The truth is that fulfilling these needs is challenging for the life sciences industry. Complexities include:
Moving forward, life sciences companies must analyze genomic, proteomic, scientific, and other data in real time, collaborate with research partners effectively, align demand and supply efficiently, establish global process and quality standards, and provide a unique customer experience to the entire target market and ecosystem. To achieve this as quickly as possible, simplifying processes wherever possible will be the first step.
But simple is not easy! How can life sciences companies fight complexity? The following areas are the best starting points on the journey to simplification:
These examples show that running more simply enables life sciences companies to achieve benefits such as accelerated growth rates, optimized spend and working capital, compliance across the enterprise, and increased market share and customer loyalty. Life sciences companies can also accelerate integration processes after M&A and maximize shareholder value by using flexible and real-time analytics on one single platform across the enterprise.
Simplification is not just a bold idea; it is becoming real across the industry. Here are some successes of first movers: Medtronic has accelerated global complaint handling and global sales processes significantly, MKI analyzes genomes quickly, Himedia Laboratories generates reports fast, and Roche Diabetes Care facilitates personalized health management.
These are just a few of many best practices in the dynamic life sciences market. What are your observations and greatest stories? Please let us know your thoughts in the comment area, and discuss with us on twitter @SAP_Healthcare!