1 2 3 6 Previous Next

SAP Master Data Governance

83 Posts

Recently I came across a need to debug the standard execution flow of the data enrichment framework in MDG to troubleshoot some issues. Apparently the trouble was that a custom enrichment done in the system wasn’t working. However, I was pretty convinced that it wasn’t the issue and decided to find out what the real trouble was.


The problem statement was that the overall MDG performance turned slow very suddenly and it seems to get stuck at the custom data enrichment applied.


So I started debugging from the point where the enrichment gave way to the standard. I could see that the enrichment did its job well, and the entities were getting the data updated correctly. Immediately after that, came  the standard validations that perform data checks on the entire change request.


The below screenshot shows the standard code which applies all the checks for the request step.



The selection was based on the below:




Based on the configuration, there was a duplicate check in place. As I gradually proceeded with the debugging to narrow down the cause, I could see that the performance hit was coming up in the duplication check.




Next round of debugging - go inside the standard duplication check to understand whats happening within it.

The standard does the duplicate search based on the configured set of attributes.


So it prepares the data and then accesses the enterprise search template set for this data model.




Once the template is obtained, it accesses the correct connector ID for establishing the link to TREX via the connectors. ( As you must be aware by now, that the connectors are setup using the ESH Cockpit , which by itself is a pretty cool feature.)




So after doing all this 'magic', it accesses TREX and tries to return the results. Now if the TREX is not accessible or has any data corruption issues with the indices, this is going to fail and there would not be any results. This has the potential to 'hang' the system.


So it was a good learning to go through all these layers and finally pin-point that the issue wasn't with any custom enhancement done, but rather with some corrupt indices in the TREX. And upon re-indexing the same and recreating the connector, the issue was resolved.


So a lesson learnt is to execute the enterprise test search tool from the back-end to check this issue out much faster than going through all the layers of debugging.




Hope this may prove useful for all the techies out there who are interested in cracking the duplication check available in the standard logic flow.

SAP Master Data Governance is a highly adaptable and feature rich solution for Master Data Management processes. The solution has matured over the years (I'm honored to have been influential in this process), but one area remains a constant source of (end user) complaints: The UI performance is sluggish, especially in MDG for Material (MDG-M).


While SAP has a great team working on improving MDG-M (including, but not limited to the performance aspects), changes of this sort to an already shipping product take time: As a customer, you certainly do not want your customized implementations to break due to some change that speeds up the application launch. Luckily, there are a few tweaks you can apply on customer side to improve the end-user experience today.



Several changes can be applied to the MDG-M standard delivery to decrease start-up and round-trip performance of MDG(-M). The proposed changes range from tweak for the frameworks used by MDG-M to UI enhancements. All changes are "legal", i.e. do not require modifications.



The changes are presented from least to most effort and invasiveness. All proposed changes are modification-free and in line with what a well-behaved SAP customer is allowed to. There is also no ABAP coding involved (which I somewhat regret ).


0. SAP Documentation

First, you reading the Master Data Governance 6.1 for Material: Performance Tweaks (or an equivalent newer guide from Configuration and Enhancement of SAP Master Data Governance) and following its advice is mandatory. If you have not read it, then read it. If you already read it, read it again, as SAP is updating its guides.


1. Use latest Software or ServicePack

There are a lot of bottlenecks in SAP code across all software components used by MDG-M (MDG Framework, FPM, WebDynpro, SPI, … and of course MDG-M itself), lots of which have been fixed over the years. Sadly, this means that there is not one single SNOTE that you can implement to get the UI to speed. Some of these fixes are not even available as SNOTE due to their complexity and dependencies, so you definitely need to (ordered by effort):

  1. Upgrade to the most current MDG-M Release (v7.0) & ServicePack (SP03 at the time of this writing)
    Since MDG is an ERP AddOn, you can upgrade this component alone sometimes, e.g. we have MDGv7.0 also running on an EhP6
  2. Upgrade to the latest kernel
    Kernels are backward compatible, and the latest ones benefit WebUI performance a lot. Ask you Basis for details.
  3. Upgrade EhP / BASIS to latest release and SPS
    We currently use MDG-Mv7 SP03 on EhP7 with SAP Basis 7.40 SP08 for new installation

I know that SPS or EhP updates mean a tremendous testing effort on customer side (hmm, so much for my ordering of the tips ), but if your project is still in the planning phase, you should definitely include the system update in your project schedule.



2. Turn off SPI checks

Implement SNOTE 2108310 to get a new option in the SPI framework to switch off data model checks for improving start-up performance. With this fix implemented, go to transaction SPI_CHECKS and switch of checks for all users for data model MDG_MAT.

The setting is per-user and per-system and not transportable, which enables you to leave the checks on in development, but switch them off in production to gain performance. Since you have fully tested your solution well on Q&A system, there is no need to run these developer checks in production. (You do test, don't you?! )


3. Stacked OVP UI

The Overview Floorplan can arrange UIBBs in a stacked layout, leading to something like a tabbed UI. This not only improves the start-up and round-trip times of the application as there are fewer UIBBs displayed / to be processed / reading & writing data, but also leads (in my opinion) to an easier to use UI with less scrolling for the end-user.


This change can be easily implemented using the FLUID editor of Floorplan Manager for Web Dynpro ABAP and one of the FPM UI extension methods (I recommend FPM Enhancements, see below). This tip is not MDG-M specific, but can be applied to other MDG applications as well.


4. Menninger's One-pager

The following tip to improve start-up and round-trip is in-house known as Menninger's One-Pager, as Mrs. Elke Menninger pointed it out to me (Allegedly it is also in the documentation, so maybe I am bad at reading documentation. ). The trick is applicable if your end-users need access to a complete SPI node like MARA (roughly corresponding to Basic Data 1 & 2 in MM01). This data is spread across several MDG entities in the data model and thus UIBBs on the screen. This allows you to both simplify the UI for the user and increase the speed of the application, since less UIBBs mean less memory / CPU usage.


Follow these steps:

  1. Open the FPM FLUID component configuration you want to change (e.g. Form for Basic Data)
  2. In "General section", press button "Feeder class parameters"
  3. Leave the entry for "Entity" blank
  4. Now add fields to your Form / List. You will see more fields to add in the list, e.g. Base Unit of Measure from MDG entity MATERIAL and Manufacturer from MARAPURCH are available in the same UIBB:


5. Entity filter

In case you require only data from some entities backing an SPI node but not all, implement SNOTE 2083931 to have a finer grained control over the entities being used by a UIBB. The effects on start-up and round-trip times are similar to the One-Pager described above, but applicable in more areas. For details, see the SNOTE description. Once correctly implemented, your feeders have an additional parameter Entities that takes a list of entities read.


6. Remove Un-used UIBB

SAP delivers a full-blown UI with UIBBs for all entities. Usually you do not have the complete Material under governance on a central system, but only some central attributes. If the UI is simplified and un-used UIBB are removed, this greatly increases start-up and round-trip performance, as the system has less data to shuffle around internally.


This change requires FPM configuration adjustments, which should be applied via FPM Enhancements or Customizing, since it is a global change that affects the display of the whole application and not just one CR type. You should therefore not use CBA, as this comes at some performance impact and thus should be reserved for per CR-type adjustments.


Note that you cannot undo this change unless you delete your customizing or enhancement, i.e. there is no Un-Delete. If you later decide that you need one of the UIBBs you deleted, you have to start from scratch again with your deletions. That said, this change takes only minute, and you do not add new governance attributes every day.


Implementation steps:

  1. Open the OVP configuration you want to change in Display mode
  2. From the menu, choose Enhance and create a Create Enhancement. Specify a name from the customer namespace and continue.
  3. In the UIBB Schema, select the UIBBs you do not need and Delete them from
  4. In the Wiring Schema, a lot of wires are now marked in red as errors because their source / target UIBBs are no longer in the UIBB Schema. Delete all the red wires, like MacGuyver showed you.


Measure & Profit

With above changes, the main screen for Material maintenance in a CREATE scenario shows up in less than 3s. This is not stellar, but much better than the out-of-the-box experience. I would like to hear from your experiences: Is you MDG installation faster? Slower? What tricks did you come up with?


As already written in the introduction, SAP is working on the performance issue in many teams. If you feel MDG performance is an issue for you, remember to open an OSS message, as a signal that this is an important topic for you as a customer.

Seems like there is no direct way out there which mentions about the various bells and whistles associated with using an enterprise service in MDG, especially if there is no PI involved.

It is a bit of a challenge to get the service working as expected, but like everything else, once it does work, it does its job beautifully.


A few points below may help many folks out there when trying to setup any inbound web service for MDG change request creation.


Let me take the example of the business partner creation in MDG. No PI is involved. The requirement is to create MDG BPs through an external system call. There is a middleware which acts like a bridge between the external system and the SAP system. This middleware will ensure the call is made correctly, the data is passed to the fields correctly, the authentication happens correctly and finally the WS RM protocol is setup and utilized correctly.


Identify the right service:

SE80--> Package --> MDG_BS_BP_XI_PROXY -->Service Providers-->BusinessPartnerSUITEBulkReplicateRequest_In


Setup the service definition/binding in SOAMANAGER for this service


Provide the endpoint as well as the WSDL Details to the third party system


Ensure the bgRFC is setup correctly in the ECC system using the transaction SBGRFCCONF


If a change request other than the one configured for the UPLOAD activity has to be used, implement the BADI MDG_SE_BP_BULK_REPLRQ_IN  and specify the change request type to be used.


Setup the global code lists of the system specific code lists for any fields requiring value mapping.


Test the service using the Test Service Provider option available within the package (in se80) and provide a sample payload.


If all the setup has been done correctly, the MDG change requests can be seen getting created.


The error messages returned in the service are pretty extensive and provide good information on where the issue is.

Usually the key problems arise because of the inconsistent formatting of the payload, absence of proper value mapping, incorrect attributes being passed etc.


Ensure that the SMT mapping is validated for BPBUPA_RPLRQ_BSFND_IN and BPBUPA_RPLRQ_ECC_CU_IN as these are the key for the customer inbound mappings. The field mappings are straightforward, however the complex transformations can be tricky, especially if some fields are not mandatory.


During the actual inbound processing that is triggered from an external system, make sure the messages are monitored using the tool SRT_UTIL as the WSRM based messaging will not return back the details of the errors.


Hope this helps folks to get a head start on the inbound service setup!

Business Requirement


SAP Master Data Governance helps organizations govern master data from its creation in a business application,through  step by step enrichment by different roles in the organization, to its replication to target applications to ensure data quality and regulatory compliance across the enterprise. SAP master data governance can be used for multiple master data domains like customer, material, supplier, articles , finance etc. As you probably are already aware, SAP MDG  process are centered around the concept of Change Requests. Any request for creation or change of an object is handled via change request. The change request work items any user receives, as part of the governance process, are visible in his workflow inbox. In a typical business day, the user would log into his workflow inbox and start processing one work item after another. The workitem inbox in its standard  view shows only the field information from the change request header


In the retail industry we very often come across a requirement in article governance process , where the category manager or the purchasing manager likes to make a decision based on certain attributes on the article master data .  These could be for example, based on the Purchasing Group decide if he is the one to process or should this be picked up by another colleague in the team  or based on the price decide if he wants to include the article in his assortment therefore move the article to the next step for further enrichment  etc


Especially during the early steps in the governance process the category manager might not want to click on the change request item and go into the details, But rather might want to make the decision on how the workitem should be processed right from the inbox.


The category manager is looking for a view where he can look at some important fields on the article data  in a single glance and make decisions on multiple articles right from the inbox without going into the detailed view screen



In this blog we will walk you through the steps required to enhance a standard MDG inbox to include additional fields.


Pre Requisites


We will enhance the inbox with the purchasing group field. The MDG for Article data model already has the field Purchasing group and hence we need not extend it. But if you want some other field as additional column in the MDG Inbox for any data model, then that respective field has  to be first extended in the Data Model



  • Create a class zcl_usmd_crequest_powl which is an inheritance from super class cl_usmd_crequest_powl.
  • Copy the structure usmd_s_crequest_powl into your own Z structure. This is nothing but your inbox structure. Now add the additional field to this structure.
  • Reimplement the method SET_MV_RESULTSTRUCTURE in your Z class and provide this structure name over there.

        Now you have your own structure which will be displayed in your inbox. In order to pass value to this field,

  • Redefine the method  IF_POWL_FEEDER~GET_OBJECTS. Call the super method first and then have your part of coding:




data: : it_wi_crequest        type usmd_ts_wi_crequest,

like line of it_wi_crequest,

type usmd_ts_wi,

like line of it_wi,

type ref to if_usmd_crequest_api,

type usmd_t_crequest_entity,

type ref to data,

type usmd_ts_field,

like line of it_field,

type string value 'wi_id = wa_wi_crequest-wi_id',

type usmd_ts_sel,

like line of it_sel,

like line of it_entity.

field-symbols: <fs_results>      type any,

type any,

type any table,

type any,

type any,

type any,

type any.




= i_username

= i_applid

= i_type

= i_selcrit_values

*     I_LANGU                 = SY-LANGU

*     I_VISIBLE_FIELDS        =


= e_results

= e_messages

= e_workflow_result_count.

e_results assigning <fs_results>.

assign component 'WI_ID' of structure <fs_results> to <fs_id>.

= <fs_id>.

append wa_wi to it_wi.


= cl_usmd_wf_crequest_mapper=>get_crequest_by_wi( it_wi = it_wi ).

loop at it_wi_crequest into wa_wi_crequest.

call method cl_usmd_crequest_api=>get_instance(


= wa_wi_crequest-usmd_crequest

= <model name>


= lo_usmd_crequest_api ).

call method lo_usmd_crequest_api->read_objectlist(


= 'MARA'


= it_entity ).

read table it_entity into wa_entity index 1.

if sy-subrc = 0.

refresh it_field.

-fieldname = 'WEKGR'.

insert wa_field into table it_field.

call method lo_usmd_crequest_api->create_data_reference(


= 'MAW1'


= it_field


= lr_data ).

assign lr_data->* to <fs_data>.

-fieldname = 'MARA'.

-low       = wa_entity-usmd_value.

-option    = 'EQ'.

-sign      = 'I'.

insert wa_sel into table it_sel.

call method lo_usmd_crequest_api->read_value(


= 'MAW1'

= 'X'

= it_sel


= <fs_data> ).

refresh it_sel.

if <fs_data> is assigned.

loop at <fs_data> assigning <fs_wa>.

assign component 'WEKGR' of structure <fs_wa> to <fs_wekgr>.

if <fs_wekgr> is assigned.

loop at e_results assigning <fs_results> where (lv_cond).

assign component 'WEKGR' of structure <fs_results> to <fs_wekgr1>.

assign component 'ARTNR' of structure <fs_results> to <fs_matnr>.

move <fs_wekgr> to <fs_wekgr1>.

move wa_entity-usmd_value to <fs_matnr>.

modify e_results from <fs_results> index sy-tabix.





refresh it_field.




this will give you the result including the Purchasing group. Now the inbox has to be changed based on this.

So, go to transaction code powl_type and change the entry usmd_changerequest_wi and change the class name11.jpg

Now your inbox will be reflected with the new value.

Note: Since inbox is a common component where all workitems from all domains are received, this column will be visible also when you login to govern your vendor master data (for example). In order to avoid this, you have to create a separate role and have your own Powl Id in that which means it will be reflected only in your current Article Inbox.




We started implementing Cost center and Profit center  with MDG 7.0 SP02. Our scenario is to have  a central MDG hub system where the cost centers and profit centers would be maintained and then in turn replicated to other SAP/Non SAP systems.


We decided to use the communication channel 'Replication via Idoc' to SAP systems.During the initial tests in development system, we found out that the standard outbound implementation classes provided by SAP perform remote validations in the target systems via BAPIs before creating and sending a IDOC for e.g.the outbound implementation class was checking if the values are being passed for mandatory fields , whether the values being transferred are available in respective check tables in target systems etc.,If these checks fail , then the replication is stopped at the MDG hub itself and the error messages are logged. These messages could be seen in DRFLOG.



This feature is in fact pretty straight forward and helps in avoiding transferring junk data from MDG hub to other SAP systems.

However , we faced couple of issues while performing tests in development system


1) Existence check:For some fields , the existence check is done. For e.g. there is a field called User responsible. It displays users available in MDG hub system. But users available in MDG hub system were not available in target systems and this caused issues in our tests.


2) Performance: We found out that the performance of the replication was not that great.  During our analysis we found out that the remote checks are taking significant amount of time.


I also wondered if this feature is needed in the scenarios where the MDG  hub and the target system are in the same system.


But this looked like a standard solution and we didn't think of contacting SAP or checking for OSS notes. So , to overcome the above mentioned issues ,  we contemplated the option of copying the standard outbound implementation class to a custom class and then skipping the validations to improve the performance. However , before starting with the implementation , I somehow had this feeling that this is not a problem unique to our organization and it could have been faced by other organizations as well. So out of curiosity I started exploring SDN and OSS notes.


To my surprise , I found out that SAP had already provided a solution for this via OSS notes  2052107 - MDG-F: New Parameter for DRF Outbound Implementations  and   2054082 - MDG-F: Issues in the ALE IDoc Replication for Cost Centers .


With the above two notes SAP has provided a new outbound parameter MDGF_NO_REMOTE_CHECK and also corresponding adaptions in the standard outbound implementation classes. If  the outbound parameter MDGF_NO_REMOTE_CHECK is set to value Y in replication model , the standard SAP  outbound implementation class skips the remote validations. This indeed greatly improved the performance.


I hope this blog would be helpful for all those looking to have the remote validations skipped.

Only recently, I gave a lecture about data quality and master data management/governance for a larger audience. It was a not the first time that I presented the topic, and I started my speech as usual with common business needs for adopting a master data strategy and then moved to the SAP software portfolio that is set to tackle the challenge.

I began with SAP Data Services and Information Steward being the appropriate weaponry for data quality improvement and control, and then came to SAP Master Data Governance bringing in the process component ensuring sustained master data quality by involving predefined validations and putting the relevant data stewards in the driver's seat.

The session went well, there was a lot of interest in the audience, and after the official Q&A part I was approached by a listener who stated that he liked the session overall, but was a bit confused by the product variety outlined in my presentation.


Well, I took the feedback... and forgot about it on my way home. It was only yesterday that this came to my mind again, and I started thinking about what the listener wanted to tell me. From an outside SAP perspective, the world obviously looks a bit different:


As a business or IT specialist in a company, if you are faced with data quality related business issues you want to:


  1. Be in a position where you can easily analyze and visualize existing data issues
  2. Be able to dig into the root cause, and be able to cleanse defective data
  3. Avoid in the long-term that such issues occur again


Actually the outlined SAP solution portfolio perfectly matches these needs, but the way data managers think starts with their needs and ends with a solution, not vice versa. So If I had told the story straight from a solution-oriented perspective and had come up with the associated software only afterwards, I guess the message would have been clearer.

It was really revealing how important it is to take the customers' perspective to get the message across and not just by telling how great our products are.





Dear MDG-Community!


Looking for information on how to build a UI for your custom object?

Then check-out the updated documentation on the help portal:

Creating User Interfaces for Single Object Processing


If you have the change to attend SAP TechEd && d-code, there is also a hands-on session on creating a custom object scenario, including the creation of a UI configuration. Join us at session DMM265 Build Processes for Your Own Master Data with SAP Master Data Governance in Las Vegas, Berlin, or Bangalore.


Can’t get there? Check-out SAP TechEd && d-code online!


Best regards,


Dear MDG-community!


With the availability of SAP MDG 7.0 SP03 we also enhanced the documentation around the change request process. Now, there is a new topic on the help portal: Configuration of the Change Request Process


This topic and its related sub-topics

- explain the change request process

- tell you about step, step type and status

- suggest a notation for change request process flow

- show how to configure the rule-based workflow in detail


We look forward to hear your feedback!


Additionally I want to make you aware of the new edition of the SAP workflow book. It also includes an extensive chapter on MDG - A must-know for all MDG Gurus! (All authors donate their proceeds to Doctors without Borders).


See: Hot off the presses, Practical Workflow for SAP http://scn.sap.com/community/bpm/blog/2014/08/03/hot-off-the-presses-practical-workflow-for-sap


And https://www.facebook.com/Workflowbook


All the best,


Hi SCN folks,

TechEd && d-code is coming closer and I prepare myself for some interesting days soon to come.  I will be in Berlin (November 11–13, 2014) at the EIM table and I am looking forward to having meetings with our customers, partners and of course with many of you.  Please stop by to chat about all EIM related topics.  I can also show you a lot of new live demos showcasing many of the latest new  EIM features. Specifically I have prepared in the last weeks the following scenarios to share with you:

  1. MDG-HANA Roundtrip Demo:
    This will guide you through brand new content which has been available since MDG7 SP02 in Q2 2014: Starting with triggering a MDG CR from a mobile app and approval in NWBC, we will then check the MDG Analytical Reporting dashboard. Lastly, we will drill down in the HANA search to the newly created supplier
  2. New MDG Fiori Apps:
    We have all the new MDG Fiori Apps up and running – we materials, customers or supplier request forms in addition to the new  financial Fiori Apps.
  3. New MDG Hana Drill Down Search for MDG-Suppliers
    This is a dedicated demo for the enhanced capabilities in the HANA Drill Down search. The demo concentrates on a supplier example.
  4. New MDG Analytics based on HANA and SAP Smart Business
    This is very exciting content: We will explore the new dashboard Tiles and Drill Downs available and additionally show how we can configure our own reports.
  5. MDG-IS including single sign-on (SSO)
    An improvement on our existing scenario but still worth looking into the details. I have managed to setup the Single Sign On between the two solutions, as well as the ability to pick multiple records for remediation.
  6. MDG-C: New Workflow Template-content based workflow routing
    Content-based routing is a well-known requirement for a master data related processes. This demo will show you the brand new MDG standard template which supports also parallel processing of content based routing. Triggering the process is done from NWBC or from Fiori app.
  7. MDG-M: BRFplus workflow – Content based routing on Material Group
    Content based workflow routing for material master data.
  8. New MDG-DMS Integration
    This will show you the new capabilities around integration of Document Management Services and MDG including a side panel graphical display to view attached images.
  9. MDG-M: Multiple Record Processing
    Was introduced with MDG7 and has interesting features available.
  10. Like & Lean UIs for Customers and Suppliers
    See how simple you can trigger new Change Requests for customers and suppliers. The complexity of the business partner is hidden to the end user.


Again, I look forward to hopefully seeing you soon and I hope we can also talk about other topics and  answer all your questions.
Let’s see us at TechEd && d-code
Best Regards

To get a complete picture of the lectures and hands-on sessions offered in the context of SAP Master Data Governance at SAP d-code 2014 in Berlin, you can simply go to the agenda builder for the event and filter by search term "SAP Master Data Governance”.
This way, you get an overview of all related sessions. From there, you can dig into the individual sessions that you are interested in to get the details.


Here is the agenda builder SAP d-code Berlin (November 11-13, 2014) already filtered for SAP Master Data Governance


Check it out and filter according to your specific needs.



Today, SAP Master Data Governance (MDG) provides applications to centrally create, change and distribute master data. Being highly integrated with SAP Business Suite, MDG re-uses data models, business rules and process logic. It provides pre-build domain-specific content and a flexible framework to define data models, processes, and user interfaces also for custom-built master data.


If you'd like to be informed on the way ahead, you may check the product roadmap for SAP MDG which has just been updated, providing the current picture of the solution today (SAP MDG 7.0 SP02), planned innovations and future trends.


SAP customers and partners can check out the document on SAP Service Marketplace at http://service.sap.com/roadmaps => Product and solution roadmaps => Database & Technology (SAP Master Data Governance: Edition 2014Q3) (SMP log-in required).

Note: See also the roadmap landing page on SAP Community Network at http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-33110.




You are trying to enhance standard data model by creating new entity types and creating relationships.



Error while trying to create a leading relationship for new entity type (SU type-4) on entity type-1 .


Error Screenshot




Create new relationship by prefixing ZZ i.e., ZZMATMARC1
MDG menu not visible on NWBC. Instead, It shows an error “The user menu tree for user is empty."
Error Screenshot
Role is assigned but folder is defined as a "link collection" instead of a "service map" - see:http://goo.gl/OEq9qa
Steps to solution
Step-1: Goto transaction PFCG


Step-2: Open your Role in edit mode.


Step-3: Goto ‘Menu’ Tab.


Step-4: Double click on the folder in which your views are defined. If no folder defined, then create one and move the views to this folder.


Step-5: Click on ‘Other Node Details’ button


Step-6: Select ‘Folder Option’ as ‘As Service Map'


Step-7: Save & Execute NWBC
Solution Screenshot




1378659 - NWBC known issues & what to check when opening a ticket


In service master i have  changed the number ranges in ACNR transaction .Now  we are facing the short dump

Asset condition was violated.This is due to the deletion of NR ,how to revert back

.i am able to create in AC03 with new number range But in Nwbc screen the mentioned short dump appears

Issue :


Whenever we are trying to Finalize the change Request (CR) which belongs to country Jersey C I, we have received the process error because of  below error message.




Solution :


To resolve this issue we have followed the below steps.


1.SAP OSS # 1901429 the country Jersey, C.I. ( Code: JE) is related to GB (this country is a crown dependency of the United Kingdom). But when we verified the country’s global parameter setup it is pointing to US (Screen shot: 1). Hence I believe for this reason we are getting the above  error message.







We have mapped  the country code JE to GB parameters.


2. Then we tried to finalize the change request again we have received the process error. This time the error message as "No geocoder for country JE maintained in system (table GEOCODERS)".


To resolve this we maintained the  below entry in the path SPRO--> SAP NetWeaver -->General settings --> Set Geocoding --> Assign Geocoding Program to Countries.



3. After this entry we tried to finalize the CR and received the error message as “Geocoder SAP0: Country specification is incomplete (Customizing)”. To resolve this I maintained the below value in table V_GEOT005 & V_GEOT005S (for Region details).



I found these  values from the URL : http://www.theodora.com/country_digraphs.html (Country : JE --> Geography) . The Geography code is similar to country code GB.


4. After this, when we tried to finalize the CR,we received the error message as “Telephone/fax code for country code JE is not maintained”. Based on this we maintained the entry in the below path


SPRO --> SAP NetWeaver  --> General settings --> Set Countries --> Define Country




I have found the Jersey Calling code from the URL: http://countrycode.org/jersey. This code is similar to GB.




After completing the above configuration, again I tried to finalize the CR  and this time it has been successfully finalized and created the Vendor Master in ECC without any issues.




I believe it might an useful.





Filter Blog

By author:
By date:
By tag: