Recently Released PY-IN Notes:1952523 - HINCALC0: ...

Sujith_EM · ‎03-30-2012

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Note Number	1952523
Topic	HINCALC0: /4MI inconsistent in rehire retro scenarios
Version	3
Validity	17.01.2014
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.01.2014 13:25:38
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing PC00_M40_CALC for rehired employees in your organization. Due to some master data changes retro is being trigerred in such scenarios.In such cases the /4MI calculation is inconsistent for rehire cases

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1950425
Topic	HINCALC0: Section 80GGA of Income Tax Act Still Valid
Version	2
Validity	08.01.2014
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.01.2014 09:15:54
Priority	Correction with high priority

Section 80GGA (i.e.,Donation for Scientific/Rural Devlpmnt) of Income Tax Act Still Valid and is not being shown in Section 80 deductions.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1942663
Topic	Employee NPS Contribution
Version	1
Validity	19.11.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.01.2014 12:02:48
Priority	Correction with high priority

As per the Income Tax Act, deduction in respect of contribution to pension scheme of Central Government (NPS) is applicable to government employees, private employees and a non-employee (self-employed) individual. This benefit is for payment or deposit of any amount in his account under a pension scheme notified or as may be notified by the Central Government within a limit of ten per cent of his salary.

Contribution to NPS is categorized as:

1. Employee Contribution [80CCD(1)]

2. Employer Contribution [80CCD(2)]

Computation of employee monthly NPS contribution and the respective deduction was not part of standard SAP system.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1957375
Topic	Inconsistent Ptax calculation for the region of MP in case of employee's leaving
Version	2
Validity	31.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.01.2014 15:46:58
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for all the employees working in your organization.

In case when an employee is leaving in mid-year belonging to the region MP, professional tax is calculated inconsistently in the leaving period. This is found inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1960774
Topic	Bihar & Orissa : Inclusion of Perquisites and Bonus for P-tax Computaion
Version	1
Validity	02.01.2014
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.01.2014 09:59:47
Priority	Correction with medium priority

As per new legal change, for Professional Tax calculation for state of Bihar and Orissa, Perquisites and Bonus amount needs to be added into Professional Tax Basis .

For reference:

Consider that a person is employed in Bihar and has a salary of Rs. 40000.00 per month and perquisites of Rs. 50,000 annuallly is given to him, in the current financial year 2013-14. Annual basis for PTax will be calculated as 5,30,000.00 (12*40000 + 50,000) in the month of September. As per the slabs, PTax deduction will be Rs. 2000/-

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1922357
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistency in ESI during retrospective run
Version	2
Validity	19.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	06.01.2014 10:03:09
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.

While you are executing payroll retrospectively, the ESI employee contribution gets reverted for earlier periods. This behavior is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1942369
Topic	Bihar PT-IV: Basis Amount not Displayed for Retro Results
Version	1
Validity	02.01.2014
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	02.01.2014 09:05:24
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating Form PT-IV for region bihar (Tcode: PC00_M40_PTX) for employees working in your organization, basis for ptax is blank even though ptax amount has been deducted for the employee. The basis amount does not appear on the report in case, there is a retrospective run performed for September period.

For reference:
Employee 'X' has his ptax basis as 30,000 per month. In the month of September, his annual ptax basis is determined and ptax amount is deducted. In October, due to certain reason, a retrospective run has been performed effective April. Now, when ptax report (Tcode: PC00_M40_PTX) is executed for generating Form PT-IV for employee 'X', basis amount displayed is blank, however, ptax amount deducted is displayed. This is incorrect.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1933629
Topic	HINCF24Q: FVU 4.0 not validated for mid year joinee's
Version	3
Valid since	09.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.12.2013 12:37:38
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing t-code PC00_M40_CALC for the employees in your organisation. Alv is genearated for the employees and you have downloaded the E-file for validating with FVU 4.0 . When you validate the file for mid-year joinee employees then the validation utility throws an error.

Example :

If you have an employee hired on 12.04.2013 and you have downloaded the E-file for the employee using F24q utility report. You validate the E-file with FVU 4.0 then the system throws an error

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1957105
Topic	Superannuation calculated incorrect in case of retro when no original result exist
Version	1
Valid since	18.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.12.2013 11:27:08
Priority	Correction with medium priority

If retroactive payroll is executed for a period for which no original pay results exists, then superannuation contribution is inconsistance

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1944597
Topic	HINCESI0: Employees being repeated in the ALV display for new Form 6
Version	7
Valid since	14.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.12.2013 09:53:56
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are exectuing t-code PC00_M40_ESI for employees in your company.
In a scenario where you generate the New Form 6 for all employees based on the payroll area then employees are repeated in the ALV display. This behavior of the report is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1933737
Topic	EPS Wages not displayed for earlier periods when an employee attains 58 age
Version	3
Valid since	09.12.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.12.2013 04:52:26
Priority	Correction with medium priority

The inconsistency described under Symptom is resolved.

To get the changes,apply the HR Support Package(s) indicated for your release in the 'Reference to Support Packages' section of this note.

Alternatively, apply the correction instructions attached to this note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1890531
Topic	Form 217 changes
Version	4
Valid since	29.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.11.2013 10:05:24
Priority	Correction with medium priority

This note contains changes related to Form 217.

The existing system behavior for form 217 report involves all the wage types that form 217 basis. Evaluation class '11' is set for all the wage types which forms 217 basis. With this setup the system checks for all the wage types in the cluster for each period of the run. This is creating long time exection of the re

Automate_calculation.pdf

Manual_Instruction_217.pdf

New : PCR – IN38 , IN39, Z217

Wage Types - /A38 , /Z38, M38B

Change : Schema - ZNNR PCR- IN44 IN54

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1936187
Topic	Orissa Professional Tax - Changes for Additional Payment
Version	1
Valid since	06.11.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.11.2013 20:07:59
Priority	Correction with medium priority

As per legal, bonuses/perquisites need to be included for basis calculation for the state of Orissa.

This note includes changes for Orissa Professional Tax with inclusion of bonus/perquisites.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1936835
Topic	Exemption Under Sec 80D : Payment for medical Insurance Premium
Version	2
Valid since	15.11.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.11.2013 11:21:59
Priority	Correction with medium priority

If an individual declares investment towards the payment of health insurance premiums, he/she qualify for the tax deduction under section 80D in infotype 0585.

Following are the possible senarios under which one can show his/her investments :

1. Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee : self, spouse and children

2. Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee : self, spouse and children

3. Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citz) : Parents

4. Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz) : Parents

As per the Government of India, an individual can not declare the investment towards senario 1 and senario 2 together i.e an individual can declare investment either towards "Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee" or towards "Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee". But declaration towards any one of these to is allowed.

Similarly an individual can not declare the investment towards senario 3 and senario 4 together i.e an individual can declare investment either towards " Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citizen)" or towards "Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz)". But declaration towards any one of these to is allowed.

Currently there is no such validation in infotype 0585 , which is incorrect.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1928279
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistency in /3I1 calculation
Version	6
Valid since	25.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.10.2013 11:47:30
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for the employees working in your organization.

In case of cross financial retro, the value of /3I1 and /3I2 in section 89 calculation is found inconsistent

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1927455
Topic	IT0582 : Lock Indicator available in view mode
Version	1
Valid since	17.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.10.2013 09:54:13
Priority	Correction with low priority

For the employees in your organisation you have maintianed the infotype IT0582. Now you have set the lock indiactor for the records maitained in the infotype. When you open the data in View mode to check the data, lock indicator symbol is not being displayed. The system behaves inconsistently.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1918405
Topic	P0185: New subtype 0006 introduced for Aadhaar Card Details
Version	1
Valid since	26.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.10.2013 10:51:33
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Aadhaar is a 12 digit individual unique identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India on behalf of the Government of India.

Till now in SAP system this information cannot be stored in SAP system.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1915902
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistency in Chapter VI /432 calculation
Version	3
Valid since	17.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.10.2013 04:41:14
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0(TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.

In case of retrospective run across financial year, inconsistency is observed in /432 calculation.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1904801
Topic	HINCTER0: Resignation Day not Considered in Notice Period
Version	3
Valid since	16.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.10.2013 09:28:32
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While you are terminating an employee through termination workbench (Tcode: PC00_M40_TERM), the date on which employee has resigned is not included in the notice period. Due to this the 'Notice Pay' calculated for the employee becomes incorrect.

For reference:
Employee 'X' resigns the organization on 31.05.2013. Notice period for the employee is 30 days. When employee is terminated through termination workbench, the actual leaving date for employee is determined as 30.06.2013, however, it should be 29.06.2013 (including the day on which employee resigns). Due to this, notice pay is calculated incorrectly.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1920198
Topic	Form 24Q E-Filing: FVU Version 4.0 Release
Version	2
Valid since	11.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.10.2013 11:52:09
Priority	Correction with high priority

A new File Validation Utility (FVU) version 4.0 has been released by the Government of India, for validating the e-files generated through Form 24Q.

The FVU version 4.0 needs to be used effective October 2013.

Following changes have been incorporated as per the features of FVU version 4.0:

1. 'Token No. of Prev. Statement' field has been provided on the selection screen of report, so as to enter the 'Token no. of previous regular statement (Form no. 24Q)' provided to the employers, whenever necessary.

2.'Whether regular statement for Form 24Q filed for earlier period' field will be populated with value either 'N' or 'Y'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1917846
Topic	Enabling Correction Run With Inactive Multiple Form16 switch
Version	2
Valid since	10.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.10.2013 06:46:35
Priority	Correction with low priority

Currently, in the standard system, if you execute correction payroll run for employees with

Correction run functionality switched on
Multiple Form 16 switched off

there is an inconsistency in payroll results.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1918284
Topic	FVU 3.8: Batch, Challan and Deductee Details Not Displayed
Version	2
Valid since	01.10.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	01.10.2013 06:00:00
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating Form 24Q (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for employees working in your organization, batch header details, challan details and deductee details are not being displayed in the downloaded file. The values are not displayed in the 'Display e-file' tab as well.

Note: This inconsistency is observed only for ECC 6.0 release.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1917140
Topic	Form 24Q : FVU version 3.9 ( changes in /4MI )
Version	1
Valid since	24.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.09.2013 08:09:52
Priority	Correction with high priority

The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes), has introduced the new version (3.9) of File Validation Utility ( FVU). Due to which modifications are done in form 24Q for ANNEXURE I.

This note delivers the changes needed to address the legal changedescribed in symptom section.

Note : Field Monthly Taxable Amount" is now changed to "Monthly Amount Paid/Credited", in order to incorporate same in Form 24Q, changes are done in the calculation logic of wage type /4MI.

Changes are done behind constant 'INMWT'. As per standard SAP delivery value '0' is being used for /4MI recalculation and the same is being used in other reports as well.

Prerequisite Support Package.

604 - SAPK-60459INSAPHRCIN

600 - SAPK-60093INSAPHRCIN

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1915100
Topic	Form 24Q - Change in Annexure I
Version	1
Valid since	19.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Announcement of Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.09.2013 06:09:41
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

Government of India has release a new File Validation Utility version 3.9 to validate the new Form 24Q file format. According to this it has been established that in the Annexure I of Form 24Q, "Amount paid/Credited" has to be reported against "Taxable amount of which tax deducted"

Solution

The Annexure I of Form 24Q was reporting total taxable income. NSDL has released an FVU 3.9, according to which it has been establised that the for the deductee details (Form 24Q - Annexure I), name of the field "Taxable amount of which tax deducted" has been changed to "Amount paid/Credited".

Therefore SAP will now report the Gross income (/416) of the employee in Annexure I instead of the total taxable income (/434) NSDL has also clarified that the "Taxable amount on which tax deducted" in Deductee details in all four quarters need not match with the "Total Taxable income" figure shown in the Annexure II (salary details)

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1911926
Topic	PrevEmp: Addition of bonus payment from Prev Fin Year's
Version	2
Valid since	19.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.09.2013 10:23:09
Priority	Correction with high priority

Previous employment data in SAP is reported in IT0580 and this infotype is primarily used when the employee is reporting income from previous employer with whom he was employed previously but within the same financial year.

If an employee is hired in 1st of Financial year/ he is an exsiting employee then IT0580 does not allow you maintian the Previous employment details. In such an scenario if any bonus payment coming from across financial year needs to be reported in current financial year needs to be captured and stored for payroll processing.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1913768
Topic	HINCF24Q : Sec80 values repeated in AnnII for 4th Quarter
Version	3
Valid since	18.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.09.2013 07:06:59
Priority	Correction with low priority

You are executing t-code PC00_M40_F24Q for employees in your company.

In a scenario where you have maintained the Sec80C entries for multiple employees and you executing the 4th quarter. Then the Sec80C values displayed in Annuxure II (Salary and Details) tab under the column head 'Ded sec 80C,80CCC,80CCD(1)' is getting repeated.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1911305
Topic	ECR : PF details should be blank in case of Exempted Trust
Version	1
Valid since	11.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.09.2013 11:27:49
Priority	Correction with high priority

While you are trying to generate ECR (Transaction PC00_M40_EPF) for employees in your organization, if employee is contributing towards an Exempted Trust, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR. PF details are to be left blank for such cases.

For referance

Employee 'X' in contributing towards an exempted trust. While you generate ECR for such an employee, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR, PF details are to be left blank in such case.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1913280
Topic	Income Tax Calc. & Leave Encashment Exem. in Case of Death
Version	1
Valid since	16.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.09.2013 11:45:52
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization, if the employee has died before completing senior or very senior citizen age, income tax is getting calculated incorrectly.

For senior and very senior citizens, separate income tax slabs apply for tax calculation. However, these slabs are applicable in case employee reaches a certain age as defined by the Government. If an employee dies before he reaches the senior/ very senior citizen age, the system still calculates tax as per senior/ very senior slabs. This behavior is incorrect.

For reference:Employee 'X' reaches 60 years (Sr. citizen) of age on 01.09.2013 and he dies on 31.05.2013. In this case, when payroll is run for May 2013, income tax is being calculated with slabs used for senior citizen. This is incorrect, as the employee died before he completed 60 years of age.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1908283
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistent ptax deduction with split records
Version	1
Valid since	03.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.09.2013 05:22:46
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU), for the employees working in your organization.

Inconsistent professional tax deduction is observed in case of retrospective run when there is a change in organizational assignment from the past periods.

Reference:

Employee's payroll has been run till August month. In the month of September there is an organizational change in IT0001, effective from August. When September's payroll is run, the professional tax deduction for the month of august is found inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1890113
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistent ptax deduction with split records
Version	3
Valid since	04.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.09.2013 05:22:26
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU), for the employees working in your organization.

Inconsistent professional tax deduction is observed in case of retrospective run when there is a change in organizational assignment from the past periods.

Reference:

Employee's payroll has been run till August month. In the month of September there is an organizational change in IT0001, effective from August. When September's payroll is run, the professional tax deduction for the month of august is found inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1893035
Topic	HINUCMAP: Dumps if IT0185 subtypes are maintained as char
Version	2
Valid since	05.09.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	05.09.2013 04:17:06
Priority	Correction with medium priority

When you execute the t-code PC00_M40_CMAP for employees of your organisation, and if you are using subtypes which are of character type. Then on executing the challan mapping program, system displays a short dump.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1902268
Topic	Sikkim Professional Tax
Version	1
Valid since	20.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.08.2013 09:31:04
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Professional Tax for the state of Sikkim has been introduced. The professional tax liability is computed on monthly basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.

For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding deduction amounts have been introduced by the Sikkim Government. Professional Tax basis is computed monthly and subsequently, Professional Tax deductions are made in each month. Professional Tax slab for Sikkim are as follows:

Monthly Salary or Wages	Tax Per Month
Upto 20,000	NIL
From 20,001 to 30,000	125
From 30,001 to 40,000	150
From 40,001 to 99,99,999	200

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1905233
Topic	Manipur Professional Tax
Version	3
Valid since	28.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.08.2013 11:11:05
Priority	Correction with high priority

Professional Tax for the state of Manipur has been introduced effective from April 2013. The professional tax liability is computed on an annual basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.

For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding deduction amounts have been introduced by the Manipur Government. Professional Tax Basis is computed annually (using projection) and Professional Tax deductions are made in each month.

Professional Tax slab for Manipur are as follows:

Annual Salary or Wages	Tax Per Year
Upto 50,000	NIL
From 50,001 to 75,000	1200
From 75,001 to 1,00,000	2000
From 1,00,001 to 1,25,000	2400
Above 1,25,000	2500

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1901554
Topic	HINCEPF0: Negative Arrears on ECR
Version	2
Valid since	23.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.08.2013 10:16:48
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating electronic challan *** return (ECR) for EPFO (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF), in case employee have certain negative arrears following inconsistencies have been observe

1. Negative arrears are also displayed as positive arrear

2. No way to determine which of the arrears are positive or which are negative

For reference:
Employee 'X' had certain PF contribution of INR 1500 in the month of April. Due to certain retrospective run, it comes out that PF contribution for the month of April should have been INR 1400. For, such cases there is a delta of INR 100 (negative), which is displayed on ECR as INR 100 (positive). This is incorrect

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1901070
Topic	IT0584 - Field Length and Short term capital gains
Version	1
Valid since	16.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	22.08.2013 08:43:01
Priority	Correction with medium priority

In order to record income from other sources for an employee, subtype 0002 of infotype 0584 is maintained. However the following were not available:

1. In 'TDS on other income' field it is not possible to maintain amount more than 99 lacs.

2. There is no field to capture 'Short Term Capital gains from listed securities

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1895518
Topic	Loans - Approver Scenario dump
Version	2
Valid since	12.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	12.08.2013 08:29:18
Priority	Correction with low priority

You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based Loans application for employees in your organization.

However, it is being observed that while the approver tries to open the application from Universal work list, dump occurs.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1897219
Topic	NPS: Inconsistent NPS Calculation For Nominal Projection
Version	2
Valid since	08.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.08.2013 12:06:43
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization who are eligible for new pension scheme having Provident Fund Contribution infotype (IT0587) maintained accordingly.

You are having Nominal Basis of projection for your payroll calculation.On execution of payroll, it is observed that the NPS amount is not getting considered for projection and hence there is inconsistency in tax computation.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1893219
Topic	HINIDAB0: Variable DA amounts incorrectly updated
Version	2
Valid since	05.08.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.08.2013 12:08:23
Priority	Correction with low priority

You are updating Dearness allowance details for the employees (using transaction PC00_M40_DAB). In such a case, the DA amounts are incorrectly getting calculated.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1886576
Topic	Form 24Q: File Validation Utility version 3.8 for 4th Qtr
Version	1
Valid since	12.07.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Legal change
Released on	29.07.2013 11:23:17
Priority	Correction with high priority

A new version (version 3.8), of File Validation Utility (FVU) has been released by the Government of India on 29th June 2013. There has been changes to the format of the e-filling format for 1st to 3rd Quarter and 4th Quarter.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1888029
Topic	HINCF24Q: Period parameter error during runtime
Version	2
Valid since	18.07.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.07.2013 12:58:53
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q report HINCF24Q (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.

While execution, a runtime error occurs with the following message 'Period parameters for payroll area not available'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1887039
Topic	Short Dump During Deferred Loans Computations
Version	2
Valid since	19.07.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.07.2013 10:29:45
Priority	Correction with high priority

You have activated deferred loans functionality in your system by activating switch HRLOCIN_SFWS_SC_03.

While executing payroll for employees having loan record a short dump is being observed in last period of loan recovery.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1884503
Topic	HINCF24Q: File Validation Utility version 3.8
Version	2
Valid since	11.07.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.07.2013 10:32:56
Priority	Correction with high priority

A new version (version 3.8), of File Validation Utility (FVU) has been released by the Government of India on 29th June 2013. File Validation Utility version 3.8 has to be used effective 1st July 2013 for validating all the quarterly files being generated through Form 24Q report (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q).

Pre-Requisite Notes : 1863154 and 1878839

There is one file for Manual Changes

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1879500
Topic	IT0007: Workhours not adjusted to new employment percentage
Version	1
Valid since	27.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.07.2013 11:31:16
Priority	Correction with high priority

This SAP Note corrects the following symptoms:

You use transaction PA30 ("Maintain Master Data"infotype 0007 ("Planned Working Time") to change the "employment percentage" for one of your rs . However,as a result of the changes, the "Work hour day/week/month/year" are not adjusted to the new employment percentage.
You use transaction PA40 ("Personnel Actions") to perform an organizational reassignment for an employee. During the maintenance of infotype 0001 ("Organizational Assignment", you select "Organizational Unit" in the position dialog box for copying the organizational assignment, and you enter an organizational unit. However, this organizational unit is not displayed on the detail screen of infotype 0001, and it is not saved either.
You perform a leaving action for one of your employees, where the "Employment status" (STAT2) should be changed to 0 ("Left"). However,the "Employment status" retains the value 3

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1871365
Topic	HINCALC0: Inconsistency in Section 89 calculation
Version	2
Valid since	08.07.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	09.07.2013 07:14:55
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.

When you are running payroll for employees across financial year, the following section 89 wage types are found inconsistent.

1. /616 - Gross taxable income arrears

2. /650 - Net tax difference

3. /622 - Professional tax amount difference

4. /6I2 - Chapter VIA deduction amount difference

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1876907
Topic	North East Tax Exemption Changes
Version	1
Valid since	21.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	02.07.2013 05:27:18
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Employees of your organization are working in North-East states where Income tax exemption under Section 10(26) is applicable.Mentioned functionality is already enabled in your system but the system is behaving incorrectly in case of some cases. for example consider the following scenarios:

1. ST Employee of any notified NE tribal area, posted in other notified tribal area will be eligible for NE Exemption only if the tribe to which employee belongs is also recognized as Scheduled Tribe (ST) in the posted area also.

2. It is not always the case, that all the ST employees of one tribal area, working in the same tribal area are eligible for NE Tax exemption.(For example all the ST employee of Assam is not eligible for NE Tax exemption).

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1853376
Topic	HINCESI0: Output display of employee with full month LOP
Version	2
Valid since	10.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	02.07.2013 07:17:35
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing the ESI report HINCESI0 for the employees working in your organization.

When an employee is on unpaid leave (LOP) for an entire month, the particular employee's record is not shown in the record output. The employee record should be shown in the output.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1878839
Topic	Changes in Form 24Q with respect to FVU 3.7 for FY-2103
Version	1
Valid since	26.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.06.2013 09:36:29
Priority	Correction with medium priority

The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes), has introduced the new version (3.7) of File Validation Utility ( FVU) on February 19, 2013. Due to which some modifications are done in E-file of form 24Q.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1866328
Topic	PZ80: Amount Field For Section 80 Details Appearing Blank
Version	2
Valid since	28.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.06.2013 06:52:52
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are trying to display the section 80 deductions details using transaction PZ80.
However, the declared amount in infotype 0585 ( Section 80 Deductions ) for an employee is not showing on screen and the field is appearing blank for recently introduced sub-sections.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1826749
Topic	ESS: Inconsistency in displaying request details in HINUACRP
Version	6
Valid since	29.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.06.2013 11:14:39
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using report(HINUACRP)to display the details of Income Tax declaration requests created via ESS Income Tax declaration application.When displaying the request, requested and approved amount is not displayed consistently in the detailed screen.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1859134
Topic	ECR: Joining Date & EPS Wages Incorrect for Some Employee
Version	3
Valid since	21.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.06.2013 03:34:55
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating ECR (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employees who are contributing towards Provident Fund, following inconsistencies have been observed:

1. Joining Date of EPF & EPS is not coming correct.

2. In 'Relationship with the member' field, for Husband 'S' should be displayed. Currently it is being displayed as 'H'.

3. In case employee is more that 58 years, pension wages shall not appear not ECR. Currently it is displayed in few cases. This is incorrect.

Employee 'X' joined the EPF trust in April 2008. However, the data is present outside SAP system. You are going live in April 2012. So, the first payroll result present in system is of April 2012. When ECR is generated for 01/2012, even though employee has joined the PF trust in April 2008, date of joining is displayed as 01.04.2012. This is incorrect. The joining details for employee shall not be displayed.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1851803
Topic	PY-IN: ESI New Form 5 Layout Inconsistency
Version	2
Valid since	19.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.06.2013 03:34:55
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing ESI report (Transaction Code:PC00_M40_ESIF) for generating ESI New Form 5.

In the output form layout, there are some inconsistencies noted in both PDF and SAPSCRIPT forms in comparison with the standard form provided by Employee State Insurance Corparation.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1870928
Topic	HINCESI0: Contribution Dates Blank On ESI Form 5
Version	2
Valid since	19.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.06.2013 09:19:33
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating ESI Form 5 (TCode: PC00_M40_ESIF) for employees working in your organization who are contributing towards ESI, the Contribution dates are coming blank.

For Reference:
You have not activated Alternate Financial Year (AFY) functionality at your organization. Employee 'X' is contributing towards ESI. When you try to generated ESI Form 5 (Tcode: PC00_M40_ESIF), contribution dates present on the Form 5 are displayed as Blank.

Note: Symptom occurs only when AFY has not been activated.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1820601
Topic	Claims: Disbursement on the last day of any payroll period
Version	7
Valid since	10.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.06.2013 08:15:25
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing claims disbursement program HINCREMP (Tcode: PC00_M40_REMP) to disburse claims for employees working in your organization.

You have disbursed certain amount & payroll has been run for that period. However, you want to disburse some more amount after the payroll has been run. When you try to disburse on the last day of such a period, the report does not allow disbursing any amount and throws an error message. This behavior is inconsistent.

Also, when the employee claims from ESS and when the admin executes the report to update infotypes (HINUINFU) after the payroll is run and the control record is in correction mode, the system does not update the infotype and throws an error. This is also found inconsistent.

For reference:
Employee is eligible for INR 10,000 in period April 2012 for a certain reimbursement. INR 5000 had been disbursed using the disbursement program. The amount is also paid to the employee when payroll is run. However, it is required to disburse another INR 5000 for period April 2012 after the payroll is run. When disbursement program is now run for last day of April 2012, an error message appears & amount would not be disbursed. This behavior is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1870310
Topic	Claim eligibility is incorrect in case of change in All. Grp
Version	1
Valid since	07.06.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.06.2013 07:25:00
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Claim eligibility amount is incorrect in case of change in the allowance grouping of the employee within period

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1861375
Topic	Form 12BA: Layout modifications 2012-13
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2013 13:15:15
Priority	Correction with medium priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees. It consists of the form 12BA also.

There some alignment issues in the layout of the script for Form 12BA.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1857827
Topic	Form 16: Dumps due to higher values in number field of WT's
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2013 12:52:29
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing the Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization and you have maintained a higher range of values for number field of wagetypes.

On executing the Form 16, system displays a short dump

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1864037
Topic	Form 16AA: To display Employee no and Pan no in header
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2013 12:46:31
Priority	Correction with medium priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company for few eligible employees Form 16AA is generated.

Then the PAN, PERNR and Employee name in Form 16AA is not being displayed in the same way that is being displayed in Form 16

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1861376
Topic	Form 16: Sec80C values are repeated in form layout
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2013 08:59:44
Priority	Correction with high priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.

When you enter the form name in the Customer Layout selection and execute the same, the Sec 80C values getting duplicated and repeated in the form Layout.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1856880
Topic	Form 16: Part A and Part B Mail Attachment & Mail Log File
Version	2
Valid since	22.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2013 07:42:05
Priority	Correction with high priority

With the new legislative changes (announced via Note 1843575), it is mandatory to generate Part A of Form No. 16 through TRACES Portal only.

These downloaded Form 16 Part A has to be then sent to employees.

There is an option required on Standard Form 16 program to send TRACES generated Form 16 Part A and the SAP system generated Form 16 Part B, in a single mail to employees.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1863154
Topic	Form 24Q : Annexure I & II Modified Formats eff. FY 2013
Version	1
Valid since	22.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.05.2013 08:38:41
Priority	Correction with high priority

As per the notification by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes) dated February 19, 2013, the format of Annexure I & II on Form 24Q has undergone few modifications.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1861373
Topic	Form 16: Layout modifications
Version	1
Valid since	17.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.05.2013 08:03:29
Priority	Correction with medium priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.

There some alignment issues in the layout of the script

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1850953
Topic	ESS: IT Declaration Dump While Updating Infotype 0586
Version	2
Valid since	16.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.05.2013 12:11:51
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization.

However, it is being observed that while updating infotype 0586 for Section 80c deductions approved requests, using report 'HINUINFU' system throws a dump 'CX_HRPA_INVALID_BUFFER_STACK'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1856369
Topic	HINCF24Q: Inconsistencies on Annex II
Version	5
Valid since	16.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.05.2013 09:15:58
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating Annex-II of Form 24Q (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for quarter 4, the following inconsistencies have been observed:

When TAN based reporting has been activated and there are splits in 'Actions' (IT0000), 'Organizational Assignment' (IT0001) infotypes of employees, the system computes the end date of employment incorrectly.
Medical exemption & section 10 exemptions from the previous employment, are getting deducted from current employment taxable income as well. This is reducing the overall tax liability for current employment, which is incorrect.

Consider that TAN based reporting has been activated at your organization. Employee 'X' joins the organization on 01.01.2011. Employee is active for whole of the duration; however, there are certain splits in 'Actions' & 'Organizational Assignment' infotypes. Suppose the splits are as below:
01.01.2011 - 20.08.2012 & 21.08.2012 - 31.12.9999. In such cases, 'Date Upto' field on Annex-II is being displayed as 20.08.2012. This is incorrect.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1855007
Topic	HINCF24C: Runtime Error while consolidating files
Version	2
Valid since	09.05.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	09.05.2013 11:02:06
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing e-file consolidation program (TCode:PC00_M40_F24C) for consolidating the different e-files generated using form 24Q report (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) into a single e-file for submitting the returns to Income Tax authorities.

While trying to consolidate e-files through the e-file consolidation program for form 24Q, a runtime error is being encountered.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1844336
Topic	HINCF24Q: Q4 Inconsistencies in Salary and Tax Details
Version	7
Valid since	30.04.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.04.2013 08:20:54
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Multiple Form 16 switch has not been activated at your organization. While generating Form 24Q of quarter 4(TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) the following inconsistencies were observed.

1. While executing for separated employees, the 'Date From' field is not displayed correctly

2. While executing for employees that joined in the month of January, the results are not displayed in the output of the report

3. While executing for re-hired employees, salary & tax details before rehiring are not being displayed in the output of the report

Multiple Form 16 switch has been activated at your organization.

While generating Form 24Q of quarter 4(TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) the following inconsistencies were observed.

4. Tax payable is not rounded before being displayed on output

5. While executing for employees having certain previous employment details, chapter VI deductions are coming incorrect

For Reference:

Employee 'X' joins the organization on 01.04.2011. This employee gets separated in middle of FY 2012 say, in September 2012. Multiple Form 16 switch has also not been activated at your organization. In such a case, the 'Date From' field on 'Salary & Tax Details' is being displayed as quarter begin date. However, it should be displayed as the start of FY 2012.
Employee 'Y' joins the organization in the month of January 2013, where no previous payroll result exists. The employee is not liable to pay tax as his income does not fall under any tax slab rate. In this case, while executing form 24Q, the report does not pick the results of employee for the fourth quarter. The details should have been displayed in the report output.
Employee 'Z' joins the organization on 01.04.2012. This employee gets separated in middle of FY 2012 say, in September 2012. In November 2012 employee is re-hired in the same organization. In such cases, salary and tax details from April 2012 to September 2012 is not being displayed in the output.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1847862
Topic	New Form 16 Layout for Financial Year 2012-2013
Version	1
Valid since	17.04.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.04.2013 10:16:49
Priority	Correction with high priority

As per the legal changes announced by the central government for financial year 2012-2013, a new layout for Form 16 has been introduced. The new layout comprises of Part A & Part B respectively.

Prerequisite: SAP Note No. 1835787. Ensure that you read and implement the manual steps and correction instructions of Note 1835787 before applying this Note.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1850965
Topic	Tax Credit Amount Not Considered for Cross FY Retro Cases
Version	3
Valid since	25.04.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.04.2013 08:21:58
Priority	Correction with high priority

As per the Union Budget 2013 - 2014, for individuals having a taxable income less than 5 Lac, a tax credit of INR 2,000 would be given. While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees, when a cross financial year retro is triggered from previous year, tax credit amount is being generated. However, it is not reducing the overall tax liability of the employee. This behavior is incorrect.

For an employee 'X' a cross financial retro is triggered. After considering the cross FY arrears, employees' taxable income comes out to be less than 5 Lac. In this case, a tax credit of INR 2,000 is generated. Suppose, the overall tax liability of employee 'X' was INR 10,000, then even after tax credit his liability remains 10,000. Tax liability for employee shall become INR 8,000 (10,000 - 2,000).

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1840856
Topic	Loan Interest amount is not getting calculated correctly
Version	2
Valid since	06.04.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.04.2013 09:00:17
Priority	Correction with high priority

Loan Interest Amount is not getting calculated correctly in the payroll.

This inconsistency occurs if repayment of loan is done by employee in the middle of the month or the pay date for payroll is Middle of the month

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1844277
Topic	Incorrect Net Pay in case of EE Eligible for Tax Credit
Version	2
Valid since	10.04.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	12.04.2013 09:28:34
Priority	Correction with high priority

If you are executing payroll for an employee who is eligible for tax credit as per Section 87A, the system computes the net pay of the employee incorrectly.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1829618
Topic	PY-IN: Union Budget Changes for Year 2013
Version	1
Valid since	04.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.03.2013 12:54:37
Priority	Correction with high priority

This Note delivers the changes related to the Union Budget for 2013

This note include changes regards

1. Introduction of new section 87A (Tax Credit)
2. Introduction of new section 80EE
3. Amendment to Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme (80CCG)
4. Introduction of 10% Surcharge for Individuals Earning Income over 1 Crore
5. Introduction of New Division under Section 80G

Manual steps also attached with this Note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1839995
Topic	PY-IN: Budget Changes 2013 - Surcharge Marginal Relief
Version	1
Valid since	28.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.03.2013 13:17:24
Priority	Correction with high priority

This Note delivers the corrections related to marginal relief for 10% of surcharge for Individuals earnings more than 1 Crore.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1829520
Topic	Union Budget 2013 - Announcement Note
Version	1
Valid since	04.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Announcement of Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	04.03.2013 12:43:47
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

Union Budget Changes 2013

Other terms

Surcharge, Tax credit, Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme, Housing loan for first timers, Long term infrastructure bonds

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1811606
Topic	Inconsistent Ptax in mid-year transfer to Jharkhand region
Version	2
Valid since	01.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.03.2013 05:48:58
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing payroll driver HINCALC0 (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Jharkhand.

While you are executing payroll, an inconsistent amount of ptax is been deducted in case of employee joining Jharkhand region in mid-year.

For Reference:

Consider a scenario, where the employee is transfered to Jharkhand region in October and is liable to pay PTax of Rs.1800 professional tax. When the payroll is run, the amount that the employee is liable to pay, gets reduced to 900 as the employee is transfered to Jharkhand in October.

So in this case, the ptax amount gets calculated as = 900 / 6 = 150.
This is observed as inconsistent behaviour. The PTax liability is dependent of the return value of the feature 40PTB.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1835787
Topic	Form 16 layout changes for financial year 2012-2013
Version	1
Valid since	19.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	22.03.2013 08:59:50
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.

As per new legal changes for Form 16, for financial year 2012-13, the system must also display 80TTA in the Form 16 in point 9 (Deduction under chapter VIA) under "B". This Note delivers the changes needed to address this requirement/change.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1825593
Topic	HINUINFU: IT0585 & IT0586 Not Updated with AFY Active
Version	2
Valid since	20.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	22.03.2013 06:54:49
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Consider that you have activated Alternate Finacial Year (AFY) at your organization. When you try to create Section 80 and section 80C details through the IT Declaration solution of Employee Self Service (ESS) Portal, after approval, the Infotype Update Report for Advanced Claims(HINUINFU) report does not consistently update the master data. This results in the generation of an error message.

For Reference:

You have activated AFY at your organization. While you are trying to create Section 80 & Section 80C through ESS portal, IT0585 & IT0586 are not getting updated. This is happening since begin & end dates are entered as 01.03.XXXX and 28.02.XXXX through ESS, however in R/3 the dates are getting entered as 01.04.XXXX and 31.03.XXXX. As per the standard behavior, dates shall be entered as 01.04.XXXX and 31.03.XXXX through ESS as well.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1826422
Topic	Jharkhand Professional Tax Reporting
Version	1
Valid since	25.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.03.2013 11:59:41
Priority	Correction with high priority

The act of Jharkhand Professional Tax has been introduced under which any person who is employed in that state is liable to pay professional tax.

Report to be delivered as part of standard solution is: FORM JPT-201

Jharkhand Professional Tax (JPT-201)is a quarterly report.

This report is used for quarterly and annual reporting of Professional Tax for state of Jharkhand.

Other terms

Jharkhand Professional Tax report, HINCPTX0 , India Professional Tax
reporting , PC00_M40_PTX - Professional Tax Reports, PCPTXIN4,PCSAPIN0 PCPTXIN1, PCEXTIN1, HR_IN_PTX_JH3_00, PCPTXIN6_PDF, T596F,

Reason and Prerequisites

The Act of Professional Tax for the state of Jharkhand has been introduced under which any person who is employed in that state is liable to pay professional tax. This is as per the legal change.

Solution

Apply the HR Support Package(s) indicated for your release in the 'Reference to Support Packages' section of this Note.

Note below points:

o Region code used for Jharkhand is '34'.

o This Note provides changes related to reporting part of the solution.

o In challan details, you need to select the quarter and as per the requirement enter the challans detials to be displayed in the form layout.

o The views V_T7INP1 and V_T7INP4 are needed to be customized as per the requirement.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1829292
Topic	HINCPTX0: Inconsistent Basis Displayed for Tamil Nadu
Version	2
Valid since	14.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.03.2013 05:33:42
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While executing Professional tax report (HINCPTX0) for employees working in Tamil Nadu region, professional tax basis amount displayed is incorrect.

An employee is working in Tamil Nadu region & is eligible for professional tax deduction. However, when professional tax report is generated for such an employee for a period, the professional tax basis amount displayed is incorrect.

For reference:

An employee is working in Tamil Nadu and has ptax basis as INR 10,000. His professional tax has been deducted & now ptax report is being executed. If report is being run for period 04/2012 i.e. July 2012, then basis is shown as INR 40,000. This is incorrect. Since for ptax computation, basis of April to September is considered, same shall be displayed as basis in report also. Hence, INR 60,000 shall be displayed as ptax basis for above scenario.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1833739
Topic	Tax Simplifier - Income from Other Sources and Payslips
Version	4
Valid since	19.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.03.2013 08:59:03
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Consider that you are using the Tax Simplifier Statement application in the Employee-Self Services for your organization. Currently, when the value in the field Long Term Capital Gains of subtype Other Sources for IT0584, is not maintained, the data related to Income from Other Sources is appearing

incorrectly. Also, the name of the payslip attached to the form is incorrect for the months of January, February and March, if payslips are being derived from the Business Add In.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1832435
Topic	E-Separation - Error while saving request
Version	2
Valid since	15.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.03.2013 10:55:32
Priority	Correction with low priority

Currently, when using the E-Separation solution in the Employee Self Service in your organization, if you try to create a separation request and save the same, then the system generates an error "No valid target content area found Message no. APB_FPM_CORE112 "

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1833034
Topic	Tax Simplifier Statement - Additional Payments
Version	1
Valid since	12.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.03.2013 09:42:45
Priority	Correction with low priority

You use the Tax Simplifier Statement application in the Employee-Self services for your organization and you have provided additional payments option to

your employees. When you try to filter the additional payments by implementing the BAdI HRESSIN_FILTER_ADDPY,the BAdI is not getting triggered.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1813041
Topic	Inconsistent Annual PTax calculation - Madhya Pradesh
Version	3
Valid since	07.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	14.03.2013 08:03:56
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Madhya Pradesh.

While you are executing payroll, it is observed that annual professional tax liability /422, is calculated incorrectly.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1820772
Topic	Inconsistency in Professional tax amount deducted
Version	3
Valid since	07.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	14.03.2013 07:57:07
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.

While you execute, the following inconsistencies are observed.

For the employees working in the state of Jharkhand, the annual professional tax is not completely deducted in case the employee leaves in the middle of a financial year.

In case of any adjustment to professional tax made by the wage type MP00, there is an inconsistency observed with the professional tax amount deducted. This happens irrespective of the professional tax state/region.

Note: If any custom wage type is being used besides standard wage type 'MP00', a custom PCR should be written to populate the payroll variable 'MP00' with the amount in custom wage type.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1830205
Topic	Runtime Error in Payroll Execution for Negative Wage Type
Version	2
Valid since	13.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	13.03.2013 11:28:11
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC) for the employees working in your organization.

It is observed that employees for whom negative values are passed in the Adjustment Wage Type system gives the DUMP error.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1828675
Topic	Form 16 Inconsistent when File Path of Tax details provided
Version	2
Valid since	13.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	13.03.2013 11:27:46
Priority	Correction with high priority

Following inconsistency was observed while generating Form 16 (Tcode:PC00_M40_F16) for employees of your organization:

If you have provided the File Path of Tax details while executing the Form 16 at your organization, the Form 16 DETAILS OF TAX DEDUCTED AND DEPOSITED will be inconsistent when executed for multiple employees.

The Form 16 output will show consistent details for first employee, whereas for rest of the employees DETAILS OF TAX DEDUCTED AND DEPOSITED was not shown in Form 16 but Blank value was displayed which is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1799853
Topic	Claims report - Carry Forward error
Valid since	08.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.03.2013 11:51:04
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Claims status report HINCREMS (T-Code - PC00_M40_REMS) to view the claims status of employees working in your organization, the following inconsistencies were observed.

1. In case of claims with carry forward frequency of more than one month, the amount is being carried forward for future months if not claimed in any period. When balance amount is being claimed in certain period, the claimed amounts are being carried forward further. This is inconsistent, since amount once claimed should not be carried forward further

2. When the status report is run for past periods after the amounts being carried forward, there are repetitive numbers of entries. This is also been observed as inconsistent.

For reference

a) For certain reimbursements, carry forward frequency is '11'. Employee has carried forward the amount for April & keeps carrying forward till February. Employee is currently in the month of March and whole amount is paid to him. Even after this, carried forward amount is being displayed in April month of next year as well.

b) For certain reimbursement, employee has carried forward the amount for April. Employee is currently in the month of August and still the amounts are not claimed. In this case, when the employee executes the status report for April, there are multiple carry forward entries. This is inconsistent

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1799089
Topic	ECR: Header Details Not Displayed for Certain Fields
Version	2
Valid since	06.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.03.2013 08:51:58
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While downloading the Electronic Challan *** Return (Tcode: PC00_M40_EPF)file as a worksheet to local systems, the system does not displays certain headings.

You have generated Electronic Challan *** Return (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF)for employee's provident fund organization and that you are downloading the generated file to local systems in worksheet format. However, after downloading, certain headings are not getting displayed

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1812451
Topic	Form 24Q: Offcycle results not displayed consistently
Version	4
Valid since	08.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.03.2013 10:45:17
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are exectuing t-code PC00_M40_F24Q for employees in your company.You have processed off-cycle payroll runs for the employee for some period.In the same period you have executed the off-cycle two times to make some payments to the employee.

In such a scenario you are using the payroll identifier to distinguish between the two offcycle runs for the same day payment. The challan mapping has been done for the employee, still when F24q report is executed all the results of the period are not displayed, for the particular quarter with offcycle runs.

In such scenario the results displayed are inconsistent in F24Q.

For Example:

1. You are using offcycle payroll type for some payments to be made in May period dated on 26.5.2012 using Wagetype X.

2. In the same period you want to run the offcycle twice on the same date,i.e., 26.05.2012

3. For the second offcycle run on the same day 31.05.2012 you are usingWagetype Y. In such scenario you want the second payroll run should have

separate record in the payroll cluster.

4. In such a scenario you enter '1' in the payroll identifier to separate both the payroll runs, during the payroll is being processed.The second offcycle run is stored with an unique identifier for same day payment and generates a separate record for the same. By default for the first offcycle run 'space' is stored as an identifier.

5. Then the described example displays inconsistency in F24Q reporting.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1624556
Topic	HINCPTX0: Error while generating form for Ptax West Bengal
Version	3
Valid since	08.03.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.03.2013 07:23:25
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You have executed the report HINCPTX0 (HR-India Professional tax reporting) for West Bengal state.

Once the ALV list is displayed with relevant PTax details, you are trying to view the Adobe layout using 'PRINT FORM' option. On trying to check 'PRINT PREVIEW', system throws a short dump

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1798064
Topic	Form 16 Report - Text Changes
Version	1
Valid since	07.12.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.03.2013 13:41:47
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Change in Form 16 report texts.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1797915
Topic	Labour Welfare Fund Report - Text changes
Version	1
Valid since	07.12.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.03.2013 13:41:12
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Change in Labour Welfare Fund report texts.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1797478
Topic	Employee State Insurance Report - Text changes
Version	1
Valid since	06.12.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.03.2013 13:40:44
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Change in Employee State Insurance report texts

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1819723
Topic	Professional Tax considers the last split of IT0007 splits
Version	2
Valid since	21.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.03.2013 12:04:10
Priority	Correction with high priority

Your are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization.

On executing the payroll for employees, it is observed that the Professoinal Tax is inconsistent due to splits in Infotype 0007. System considers the last split and calculates the Ptax for the last split and not for the entire month, even if the employee is ellible for entire month.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1796692
Topic	Provident Fund Report - Text changes
Version	1
Valid since	05.12.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	01.03.2013 08:55:06
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Change in Provident Fund report texts.

Code changes have been done in Provident Fund report for the above symptom.

These changes are available with the mentioned HR Support Package.

If you need these changes immediately then Apply the Correction Instructions attached with this Note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1816695
Topic	Variable DA amounts incorrectly calculated
Version	2
Valid since	12.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.02.2013 11:10:29
Priority	Correction with high priority

Currently in the standard system, when you update dearness allowance details for employee (Using transaction PC00_M40_DAB), the system incorrectly calculates DA amount, in case you have enabled 'Incremental CPI slab Based calculation'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1799084
Topic	/4MI Incorrect With Prev. Employment Profits & Perquisites
Version	3
Valid since	18.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	22.02.2013 08:59:39
Priority	Correction with medium priority

In case, previous employment details are maintained for an employee through IT0580 (Previous Employment Details), the system incorrectly calculates monthly taxable income while executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC).

Consider that you are executing payroll for an employee working in your organization. The employee has certain previous employment details maintained through infotype IT0580. Employee has certain Profits in lieu of salary u/s 17(3), perquisites u/s 17(2) & medical reimbursement components also in his previous employment. Hence, the same has been maintained in IT0580. In such a case, the computed monthly taxable income is incorrect.

Monthly Taxable Income should be calculated as follows:

[Total income on which tax is computed - previous employment gross salary - previous profits in lieu of salary u/s 17(3) previous perquisites u/s 17(2) + previous employment exemptions (under section10, PF contributed, professional tax, medical reimbursement)- already computed monthly taxable income (/4MI)] / number of remaining months

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1823633
Topic	Professional Tax reporting inconsistent for Tamilnadu State
Version	2
Valid since	21.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.02.2013 11:42:30
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using Tamil Nadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as '22'.

When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region Tamil Nadu, Professional Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is consistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1808184
Topic	ESS: Error in Maximum Loan Eligibility Check
Version	4
Valid since	08.02.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.02.2013 11:41:55
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You have implemented Loan functionality through ESS. The maximum loan eligibility amount for an employee is calculated based on the wagetypes maintained in IT0008 (Basic Pay).

While calculating the maximum loan eligibility based on the non indirectly valuated wagetypes maintained in IT0008 (Basic Pay), the calculated eligibilty amount is inconsistent

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1812201
Topic	Tamilnadu State Profession Tax reporting issue
Version	1
Valid since	23.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.02.2013 08:16:27
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using TamilNadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as '22'. When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region TamilNadu, Prosession Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is

consistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1812201
Topic	ESS: IT Declaration Dump While Updating Infotype 0585
Version	3
Valid since	23.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.01.2013 05:20:05
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization.

However, it is being observed that while updating infotype 0585 for Section 80 deductions approved requests, using report 'HINUINFU' system throws a dump 'CX_HRPA_INVALID_BUFFER_STACK'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1784876
Topic	Inconsistent /A60 and /Z60 Formation
Version	2
Valid since	22.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.01.2013 11:01:03
Priority	Correction with high priority

Consider that an organization follows the practice where retrospective payment and the tax on retroactively paid amount needs to be accounted

to the same company code ,which is then also submitted to Government by the same company code.

In such situations if an employee is withdrawn ( Employment status '0') has a retro respective payment in spite of no company code change, the system generates /A60 wagetype.

This leads to inconsistency in the payroll results.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1807022
Topic	Inconsistency in calculation of Jharkhand PTax
Version	4
Valid since	21.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	22.01.2013 09:33:04
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing payroll driver HINCALC0 (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Jharkhand.

While you are executing payroll, following inconsistencies have been observed:

1. Annual professional tax liability /422, is calculated incorrectly.

2. Wagetypes being used for one-time payments are same for different regions. Due to this, these one-time payments, e.g. bonus, are being considered for professional basis formation of all the regions. This is incorrect. One-time payments are considered for professional tax basis formation only for certain regions.

Click for FAQ on Jharkhand Professional Tax

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1766013
Topic	India ESS : Income Tax Declaration BAdI issue
Version	2
Valid since	18.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.01.2013 10:41:16
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are implementing ESS-Income Tax Declaration application and you are facing the below issue:

BAdI: HR_IN_ESS_ACTPROP (Actual and Proposed Column Visibility

You have implemented the above BAdI for enabling and disabling the actual and proposed amount column fields in the application.However even after implemention, the instance of the BAdI is not returned and hence the method READ_ACT_PRO_VIS is not executed.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1799751
Topic	ESS: Advanced Claims approval scenario eligibility issue
Version	3
Valid since	17.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.01.2013 13:16:39
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using advanced claims application in employee self service scenario for employees in your organization.

However, on the approver overview Screen, while loading the requests for approvers of the claim requests, the eligibility data is being fetched for all the reimbursement types which is resulting in reducing the performance of the application.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1804669
Topic	HINCALC0 : Inconsistency in Section 89 calculations
Version	2
Valid since	17.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.01.2013 14:54:24
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing a cross Financial Year retroactive payroll run (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.

On execution, it has been observed that Section 89 calculations are happening inconsistently.

Consider a case where an employee is being paid an arrear amount retrospectively for the year 2010. The difference between the original /416 amount and the /416 in the current run would form /616 in the difference table (DT). While section 89 calculation is processed, the previous retrospective payments for the same year are adjusted with the /616 in the current payroll run, which is not happening. This is found inconsistent

Note: This note is valid for SAP-HR release 4.7 only.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1790225
Topic	Form 24Q: Change in column header text of ALV output
Version	1
Valid since	20.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Modification
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.01.2013 07:23:17
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Change in Form 24Q report output ALV column header text.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1792045
Topic	Tamilnadu State Profession Tax reporting issue
Version	5
Valid since	15.01.2013
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.01.2013 10:46:43
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using TamilNadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as '22'. When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region TamilNadu, Prosession Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is consistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1804729
Topic	Form 27A : Organisation name displayed inconsistently
Version	2
Valid since	31.12.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	04.01.2013 11:20:04
Priority	Correction with medium priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F24q for the employees of your company the Form 24q is generated for all of the employees.When you try to execute the F27A tab during reporting of F24Q the organisation name displayed on the Form 27A is incorrect.The organisation name gets truncated.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1785552
Topic	Inconsistency in Loan eligiblity amount
Version	2
Valid since	29.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	12.12.2012 08:20:27
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are creating a loan for an employee from transaction 'PA30' in Loan infotype (IT0045).After inputing the necessary details in the screen, on press of 'Enter' button, you see that eligible loan amount is getting doubled everytime on press of 'Enter' button.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1782402
Topic	Professional Tax reporting form for India
Version	3
Valid since	29.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	11.12.2012 04:43:05
Priority	Correction with high priority

India Professional Tax reporting form provides detailed information as per the statutory format required to submit the profession tax paid by the employees.

The system generates a list with the employees' basic details corresponding to the form that is selected, where the details for "Employees Whose Monthly salary or wages are" is not displayed as per the slabs maintained.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1783287
Topic	ESS IT Declaration: Restricting Only Valid Entries To Appear
Version	2
Valid since	20.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.11.2012 10:25:04
Priority	Correction with medium priority

The Validity dates for each entry in V_T7INI8 should be properly maintained in V_T7INI9 & V_T77WWW_GAHLP for 'Section 80' scenario and

similarly for 'Section 80 C' for each investment code in T7INI3 the validity dates should be maintained consistently in V_T7INI4 and V_T77WWW_GAHLP

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1787974
Topic	Salary Packaging: Change in message text on request screen
Version	1
Valid since	14.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.11.2012 04:51:09
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing T-Code 'P16B' for salary packaging.

As per the configuration in Feature '16UPD', when the return value is 'X', the request does not require an approval from manager.

However, while requesting the salary package, the information text 'After you are sure that the package is assembled the way you want, please press REQUEST to request it from your manager' gets displayed on the screen.

Note: This change is only related to Payroll India (PY-IN)

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1767904
Topic	Electronic Challan *** Return: Corrections
Version	4
Valid since	19.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.11.2012 10:46:32
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating the Electronic Challan *** Return (Tcode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employee's provident fund organization certain data on ECR is inconsistent.

You are generating Electronic Challan *** Return (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employee's provident fund organization. Following inconsistencies are observed:

Employee Number is being displayed in the 'Member ID' field. This is incorrect. System must ideally display the employee's PF account number in 'Member ID' field.

When the system generates ECR for multiple employees, if any employee has certain number of 'Non Contribution Period days' (NCP Days), then all subsequent employees being processed after this employee would also have the same number of NCP days displayed on respective ECR.

'Diff EPF and EPS Contribution (Due)' & 'Diff EPF and EPS Contribution (Rem)' fields are displayed incorrectly.

When ECR is downloaded to local systems in the form of worksheets, certain headings were not getting displayed.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1777366
Topic	Inconsistency in Termination workbench report
Version	2
Valid since	19.10.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.11.2012 10:26:37
Priority	Correction with high priority

Inconsistency in Termination workbench report HINCTER0.

When executing t-code PC00_M40_TERM, for employees in your company the report behaves inconsistent.

If multiple WageType's are being updated via the report then the update of WageType is inconsistent. The records do not get updated in the IT0015 also.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1784863
Topic	Inconsistent Sec 89 When Payroll Run For Multiple Employees
Version	1
Valid since	07.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.11.2012 10:21:07
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for multiple employees,if one of those employees has certain section 89 details, same details

are being displayed in the results of other employees as well.

Consider the scenario that regular payroll is being executed for multiple employees. One of these employees has certain income from previous year and tax. Also, one another employee has an off-cycle payroll run before the regular run in current period. As a result of this, the employee who has the off-cycle payroll run before regular run, is getting this income and tax amount and hence the income tax calculation for them is going wrong. This behavior is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1772337
Topic	Jharkhand Professional Tax
Version	2
Valid since	06.11.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	06.11.2012 12:25:24
Priority	Correction with high priority

Professional Tax for the state of Jharkhand has been introduced in September 2012 w.e.f 30th January 2012. The professional tax liability is computed on an annual basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.

For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding

deduction amounts have been introduced by the Jharkhand Government. Professional Tax Basis is computed annually (using projection) every month and subsequently, Professional Tax deductions are made in each month. Professional Tax slab for Jharkhand are as follows:

-----------------------------|----------------|

|Annual Salary or Wages | Tax Per Year |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

| Upto 3,00,000 | Nil |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

| From 3,00,001 to 5,00,000 | 1200 |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

| From 5,00,001 to 8,00,001 | 1800 |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

| From 8,00,001 to 10,00,000 | 2100 |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

| Above 10,00,000 | 2500 |

|-----------------------------|----------------|

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1769693
Topic	HINCALC0 : Employer's NPS Exemption Calculation Inconsistent
Version	1
Valid since	27.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.10.2012 08:24:13
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

The Values in exemption Wage types /3I5 (Sec80CCD Employee deduction) and /3I6 (Sec80CCD Employer deduction) need to be rounded off to the nearest rupee.

In case of splits because of mid-month salary change for a period system must calculate NPS monthly contribution for each split independently and the total contribution for the month to be derived by adding all such splits

In case of arrear payments '/3FS' (Employer NPS Monthly Contribution Amount) in retrospective calculation needs to be re-calculated and the value of the wage type need to be stored in the payroll cluster.Also the amount carried forward needs to be stored in the current month for reporting purpose.

One attachment is with this note for manual correction

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1751681
Topic	Package Adjustment For India Specific Loans Infotype Objects
Version	1
Valid since	09.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.10.2012 08:23:45
Priority	Correction with medium priority

1) Infotype 0045 has screen 2640 for displaying the slab rates for loan. Package "PCLO" which is the package for international loan functions holds screen 2640 & hence the same needs to be removed as it is not necessary anymore. Slab rates can be maintained and displayed in view V_T7INJ7.

2) Include MP0045_IN has been inserted in report MP004500 which is module pool report for Infotype 0045 (Loans) and belongs to package "PCLO". This include has source code for calling screen 2640 for displaying slab rates for loans on click of overview button.Country specific include MP0045_IN should be removed from international module pool for loans MP004500.

3) Standard BAdI implementation HR_IN_LN_REPAYMENTPL & the corresponding implementation class CL_IM_HR_IN_LN_REPAYMENTPL for BAdI definition HRPY_LOAN_PAYMENTS was created in package "PCLO". This implementation & the implementing class needs to be removed from the system.

4) BAdI implementation class such as CL_IM_HRPY_LOAN_PAYMENTS & CL_IM_HRPY_LN_REPAYMENT_PL have been kept in the system without any specific corresponding BAdI implementations and hence needs to be removed. Also the class package attributes are in "PCLO".

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1770268
Topic	Professional Tax for Jharkhand
Version	1
Valid since	28.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Announcement of Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.09.2012 04:28:37
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

Announcement of Professional tax for the state of Jharkhand

SAP will be delivering the required changes in the system shortly. In the mean time customers are requested to handle the same manually for the month of September 2012 by using region code 34 for Jharkand and using the INPX rule.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1775115
Topic	IT0585 inconsistent due to delimit of a particular record
Version	2
Valid since	16.10.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.10.2012 08:50:26
Priority	Correction with high priority

When IT0585 is edited to modify the already existing Contribution details then inconsistent details are displayed for a particular FY.

When a record is delimited from a certain period other records followed by the delimited record is not displayed consistently in IT0585 in Edit mode.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1774193
Topic	Section 80CCG : Gross Total Income check
Version	1
Valid since	10.10.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.10.2012 12:50:43
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Payroll driver program (T.code - PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for executing payroll for employees working in your organization, who has contributed towards Section 80CCG scheme.

While executing payroll, it is observed that employees gross salary income considered for the eligibility check is inconsistent.

Reason :Program error.

Prerequisites:SAP Note 1743285 to be implemented.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1762530
Topic	Monthly Taxable Income Incorrect With Prev. Employ. Details
Version	1
Valid since	10.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	15.10.2012 11:56:37
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

In case, previous employment details are maintained for an employee through IT0580 (Previous Employment Details), the system incorrectly calculates monthly taxable income while executing payroll (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC).

Consider that you are executing payroll for an employee working in your organization. The employee has certain previous employment details maintained through infotype IT0580. Employee has certain exemption u/s 10,provident fund & professional tax components also in his previous employment. Hence, the same has been maintained in IT0580. In such a case, the computed monthly taxable income is incorrect.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1622625
Topic	Leave Encashment Amount not Considered for HRA Calculations
Version	2
Valid since	08.10.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.10.2012 08:21:21
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

Leave encashment is the amount payable for the employee's leave period, depending upon the leaves to his credit and his salary at the time of

termination of employment or at the time of encashing his leaves.

Employees can avail exemption on leave encashment amount on the basis of

minimum of 4 values:

- Exemption limit

- Payment received

- Average monthly salary for a predefined no. of months multiplied by a multiplication factor.

- Average monthly salary for a predefined no. of months multiplied by remaining no. of leaves (in months).

As per govt. rules, in case an employee claims for leave encashment during his tenure of service, payment received for it should be considered as taxable. Also, it subsequently gets considered while calculating HRA basis as well. However, on executing the payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) currently, payment amount is not being considered for forming HRA basis.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1765568
Topic	Layout corrections for form 16 Script and PDF : 2012
Version	1
Valid since	17.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Modification
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	26.09.2012 12:56:55
Priority	Correction with high priority

When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.

This Note contains multiple corrections for Form 16 :

1. Layout issues of PDF format are corrected

2. Layout issues of Script format are corrected

3 Attachments are along with this Note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1757684
Topic	Kerala Panchayat Raj - Professional Tax
Version	1
Valid since	27.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.09.2012 14:05:00
Priority	Correction with high priority

Currently system has provision for Professional tax for Kerala state under the region code 11. However as per the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act , each panchayat can have its own slab rates.

Hence a provision is provided in the system where it is possible to create region codes for different Panchayats where specific slab rates can be maintained.

1.Within Kerala state there can be multiple Panchayats and each will have its own slab rates. Keeping this in view we have provided an option to be able to configure new region codes in the system.

2.The calculation logic for Professional tax calculation is half yearly and for the first half of the year (April to September) calculation of professional tax is performed in July. If there is any additional tax is applicable the same is deducted in August / September for the first half year. For the second half (October to March) calculation of professional tax is performed in January. If there is any additional tax is applicable the same is deducted in February / March for the second half of the year.

3.If there is transfer among different Panchayats within Kerala the already Paid out Ptax will be adjusted for calculation of professional tax that employee has to final pay for the block of six months.

4.Slab rates for one new region code that will be configured in system are as follows Slab Half yearly income (Rs) Maximum half yearly tax (Rs)

1 from 12,000 to 17,999 120

2 from 18,000 to 29,999 180

3 from 30,000 to 44,999 300

4 from 45,000 to 59,999 450

5 from 60,000 to 74,999 600

6 from 75,000 to 99,999 750

7 from 1,00,000 to 1,24,999 1000

8 from 1 ,25,000 onwards 1250

Note : To activate this solution kindly consult your legal counsel.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1756064
Topic	Tax paid by EE and ER to be mapped seperately
Version	1
Valid since	22.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.09.2012 07:05:06
Priority	Correction with high priority

Tax paid by EE and ER to be mapped seperately using Challan Mapping report

Note: There is an attachment along with this Note about Mapping Utility Screen changes

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1755357
Topic	PY-IN:INBTD - Off Cycle Bonus Payment for Sr. Citizens
Version	2
Valid since	20.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.09.2012 06:39:39
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are processing additional payments (Ex Bonus payment) in Off cycle payroll run and for Sr Citizens the income tax calculation is not consistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1755993
Topic	Non contributing days is exceeding 999 for PF report
Version	2
Valid since	14.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.09.2012 04:37:19
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Inconsistency in Annual PF report HINCEPN1

When executing t-code PC00_M40_PNY, a run time error is appearing in the same.

"Workdays of absence class" / Non contributing days is exceeding 999, However the maximum length of the field is 5 with 2 decimal place i.e. the maximum value it can contain is 999.99 but in this scenario it is exceeding 999 causing this run time error.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1759499
Topic	PY-IN : TAN upload utility not selecting as per company code
Version	2
Valid since	20.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.09.2012 13:13:40
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are running TAN upload utility PC00_M40_UTAN and providing company code as one of the selection condition . System is also selecting the employee who do not belong to the company code provided in the selection screen.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1756887
Topic	Form 16: Challan Details Inconsistent When AFY Activated
Version	1
Valid since	24.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.09.2012 05:06:10
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While generating Form 16 (TCode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees working in your organization challan details are inconsistent in case Alternate Financial year has been activated in the organization.

You have activated Alternate Financial Year in your organnization & executed the payroll for employees. You have even performed challan mapping for the all the periods of the financial year. However, on generating Form 16, challan details on form 16 are displayed inconsistently.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1732259
Topi	E-Separation : Generic Changes
Version	3
Valid since	30.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.09.2012 06:39:39
Priority	Correction with low priority

New Features available for E-Separation Solution
You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.

These are the new features being provided:

(1) In Due Clearance configuration, if the position is maintained, then the tasks are not getting triggered to the respective task owners

(2) Maintenance of Users and Position for Counselors, Approvers and Task Owners in production environment directly

(3) Starting of the Due Clearance stage depending on completion of Approval stage

(4) Starting of the Exit Interview stage depending on Approval and Due Clearance stages

(5) BAdI for validations of input on E-separation request creation/initiation screen

(6) BDC to update Infotype 0001(Organizational Assignment) in case of Separation, Pre-Separation and withdrawal actions

(7) Prefilling of the HR Exit Interview form with the data filled by the employee in case of sequential process

(8) In the SAP standard Due Clearance letter, task owner details are made available

(9) In the Approver Overview screen, the tab Approval verview has been renamed as Separation Request Approval

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1762793
Topic	Form 16: Delimited Sections of Income Tax appears on Form 16
Version	1
Valid since	10.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.09.2012 09:50:16
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.

On execution, the sections of Income Tax which are no longer valid for a particular financial year and have

been delimited in the system are still appearing on Form 16.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1762799
Topic	E-Separation: Stage start time not as per configuration
Version	3
Valid since	13.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.09.2012 09:01:00
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.

However the system triggers the stage before the start time for that particular stage has been reached.

The stages are not getting triggered as per the configuration done in view V_T77WWW_EASTT.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1748145
Topic	ESS: Tax Simplifier Statement Fiscal Year On Payroll Area
Version	2
Valid since	12.09.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	13.09.2012 06:26:54
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Tax Simplifier Statement application for employees in your organization from Employee Self Service (ESS) scenario.

However it is being observed that the payroll data is not getting displayed consistently on the form as the financial year determination happens on the basis of fiscal year variant entry in table T001.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1739643
Topic	Electronic Challan *** Return For Employee's Provident Fund
Version	2
Valid since	20.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.08.2012 06:11:14
Priority	Correction with high priority

Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) has launched online receipt of Electronic Challan *** Return (ECR) from April 2012. As per the EPFO notification, there is no need to submit other returns via Form 5/10/12A, 3A and 6A. . All EPF related data can now be uploaded in Electronic Challan *** Return (ECR) format, using internet services.

Employers are requested to register their establishments at the EPFO portal. The registered employers can upload the Electronic Return and the uploaded return data will be displayed through a digitally signed copy in PDF format. It will be available for printing also.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1749826
Topic	PF No. Not Displayed In Overview After PF No. Length Change
Version	2
Valid since	17.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.08.2012 10:09:09
Priority	Correction with medium priority

PF and pension account number length had been increased from 20 characters to 40 characters. However, while we take an overview of 'Provident Fund Contribution' details of an employee, PF and Pension number fields are not getting displayed consistently

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1743285
Topic	Section 80CCG : Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Schema (RGESS)
Version	3
Valid since	16.08.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.08.2012 06:16:34
Priority	Correction with medium priority

A new scheme called Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme is proposed in the Union Budget 2012-13 to encourage flow of saving in financial instruments and improve the depths of domestic capital market

According to the Finance bill the newly inserted Section 80CCG provides deduction wef assessment year 2013-14 in respect of investment made under notified equity saving scheme.

The assessee's gross total income does not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs and once invested in the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme the investor is locked-in for a period of 3 years from the date of acquisition in accordance with the above scheme.

Amount of deduction -The amount of deduction is at 50% of amount invested in equity shares. However, the amount of deduction under this provision cannot exceed Rs. 25,000. If any deduction is claimed by a taxpayer under this section in any year, he shall not be entitled to any deduction under this section for any subsequent year.

Withdrawal of deduction - If the assessee, after claiming the aforesaid deduction, fails to satisfy the above conditions, the deduction originally allowed shall be deemed to be the income of the assessee of the year in which default is committed.

There are certain manual steps you have to perform the details is in the attachment Section_80CCG.zip

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1744069
Topic	Inconsistency in /6I2 calculation
Version	3
Valid since	20.07.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.07.2012 12:24:22
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing PC00_M40_CALC for the employees working in your organization, for whom Section 89 calculation is enabled.

In case of retrospective run across financial year, the value of /6I2 is found inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1739167
Topic	/616 Inconsistent When Payroll Run For Multiple Employees
Version	3
Valid since	20.07.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.07.2012 12:42:02
Priority	Correction with high priority

While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for multiple employees, if one of those employees has certain section 89 details, same details are being displayed in the results of other employees as well.

Payroll is being executed for multiple employees. One of these employees has certain previous year income and tax. As a result of this, some other employees are getting this income and tax amount and hence the income tax calculation for them is going wrong. This behavior is inconsistent

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1724071
Topic	Inconsistent Tax Calculation when AFY switch is enabled
Version	1
Valid since	29.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.07.2012 07:15:17
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization with Alternate Financial Year switch enabled for all employees.

On executing payroll, it is observed that tax calculation is not happening consistently.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1717589
Topic	Professional Tax Reporting (Bihar) - Changes
Version	1
Valid since	10.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.07.2012 06:43:06
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing the report (HINCPTX0) for generating Bihar Professional Tax Forms for your employees working in your organization.

While executing it is observed that the form layout alignment and Form header data are inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1707877
Topic	Layout Corrections for Form 7 and Form 8 - Pension Reports
Version	3
Valid since	02.07.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.07.2012 06:43:29
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Pension fund report (Tcode: PC00_M40_PNY) for the employees working in your organization to generate Form 7-FPF (Yearly report in detail for Exempted Establishment) and Form 8-FPF (yearly report for Exempted Establishment - 1971/95).

On executing the Form, it is observed that Form/s alignment is not displayed consistently. Also, 'Reason for leaving' and 'Date of Leaving' are not displayed consistently.

For manual steps two zip files is attached along with this note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1737918
Topic	Section 80CCG - Budget 2012-13
Version	1
Valid since	04.07.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Announcement of Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	04.07.2012 09:28:22
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

A new scheme called Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings scheme is proposed in the Union Budget 2012-13 to encourage flow of saving in financial instruments and improve the depths of domestic capital market.

This Legal change announcement note is being released to inform customers that SAP will be delivering this change in the month of August

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1168955
Topic	PY-IN - Document changes
Version	1
Valid since	13.05.2008
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.07.2012 07:37:26
Priority	Correction with low priority

Document changes related to Payroll India

Textual changes related to India payroll functionality have been delivered.

To get these changes, implement the relevant HRSP mentioned in the note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1725211
Topic	AFY : Amount was not calculated as per the Slabs maintained
Version	1
Valid since	01.06.20122
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.07.2012 05:55:53
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing the payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC) for an employee.

On execution when AFY (Alternate Financial Year) switch is active,Tax amount is not getting calcuated consistently as per the Slabs maintained.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1732447
Topic	Monthly Car & Conveyance Amount Not Calculated Consistently
Version	2
Valid since	06.07.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	09.07.2012 07:39:35
Priority	Correction with medium priority

While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization, the system does not calculate monthly conveyance allowance paid to the employee consistently.

You are executing payroll for employees of your organization who have certain amount paid as car and conveyance allowance. After payroll has been executed, car & conveyance allowance is not getting reflected in the relevant wage type consistently

Employee is being paid INR 1500 per month as car & conveyance allowance. Employee is eligible for a maximum of INR 800 (per month) as conveyance exemption. Once payroll is executed, car & conveyance allowance is getting reduced to INR 800. This is incorrect. Car & conveyance allowance amount should be calculated as INR 1500.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1713493
Topic	Deferred Interest: For multiple loans
Version	2
Valid since	29.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	02.07.2012 04:51:29
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are using the Deferred loan functionality and have multiple loans for an employee. Some of the loans are marked as deferred loan in tableT7INJ1. While running payroll /LID- Interest due is not calculated correctly and the wage type /LIA is not formed correctly.

Also wage type /LIA- Interest accumulated is not formed for new employees (New Hire).

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1731727
Topic	NPS : Rounding off employer's monthly contribution amount
Version	1
Valid since	19.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.06.2012 12:54:34
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization who are eligible for new pension scheme

having Provident Fund Contribution infotype (IT0587) maintained accordingly.

On executing the payroll, it is observed that the employer's monthly contribution amount towards new pension scheme is not getting rounded off to nearest rupee.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1727170
Topic	ESS: Section 80 & 80C deduction date issue for new hires
Version	2
Valid since	27.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.06.2012 12:54:11
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are using "Section 80 Deductions" and "Section 80 C Deductions" application under "Benefits & Payments" tab in Employee self service (ESS) scenario.

However it is being observed that for employees who are hired in the middle of the financial year, the updation of the infotypes 585(Section 80 deductions) and 0586(Section 80c deductions) is not happening properly.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1734563
Topic	Finance Bill 2012: Section 80CCF not valid from FY 2012-2013
Version	1
Valid since	26.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	26.06.2012 13:01:54
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

Finance bill 2012 has been assented and as per the bill, deduction under Section 80CCF ( Contribution to Long Term Infrastructure Bonds ) of income tax has now been discontinued starting financial year 2012-2013.

Manual correction steps attached along with this note

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1727139
Topic	HINCF24Q: Mid hire Ee's not reported during period of hiring
Version	4
Valid since	26.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	26.06.2012 04:44:56
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.

In case the employee is re-hired during middle of a month in a FY with only one split present in the payroll cluster, Form 24Q does not display consistent results on execution for the employee.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1730257
Topic	E-Separation: Department task owners mail not triggering
Version	2
Valid since	18.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.06.2012 09:08:31
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.

However when due clearance stage is initiated on execution of infotype update report for E-Separation (HINUEATP) it is being observed that intimation & reminder mails are not getting triggered to all relevant task owner's of departments as configured in the system.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1727550
Topic	HINCPTX0:Slab range not visible on PTax form for Maharasthra
Version	2
Valid since	18.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.06.2012 09:08:50
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You have executed the report HINCPTX0 (HR-India Professional tax reporting) for Maharashtra state region.

Once the ALV list is displayed with relevant Professional Tax details, you are trying to view the Adobe layout (PDF) using 'PRINT FORM' option. However while generating the form the slab range is not appearing on Form 3.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1722690
Topic	Inconsistent value of Perquisite in Form 16 under Form 12BA
Version	3
Valid since	18.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.06.2012 06:21:03
Priority	Correction with High priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.

However, while generating the form, the value of perquisite under section 17(2) in part B and total value of perquisites under form No.12BA are not getting displayed consistently.

Note : This SAP note is applicable for releases 4.7 and 4.6C only.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1665182
Topic	PY-IN: Form 217(2A) - No Payroll Results Available
Version	3
Valid since	18.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.06.2012 06:14:32
Priority	Correction with High priority

You are executing the Form 217(2A) report.While executing the report,you are getting a pop up message saying that "No Payroll Results available for employee/employees selected for this criteria".

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1712721
Topic	Professional Tax Block is inconsistent for multiple F16
Version	2
Valid since	11.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	14.06.2012 04:48:44
Priority	Correction with High priority

The multiple form 16 switch is active and you are executing payroll for an employee who belongs to a state where professional tax is not monthly (example Tamilnadu). System is not calculating the professional tax basis inconsistently for the second half of the year.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1720788
Topic	Form16:Fiscal Year Dates for AFY , Annexure-B & Perk
Version	5
Valid since	11.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	14.06.2012 04:48:09
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

Following inconsistencies are observed while generating Form 16 (Tcode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees of your oranization:

1. Payroll has been processed for an employee for different months and tax is deducted for the months. You have only mapped the challan for few months. In such a case the last month with mapped challan details is getting populated for the rest of the months for which payroll is processed and tax is deducted.

Payroll is processed for 01 to 06 period and each period has tax deduction. However the challan mapping is done only for 01 and 02 period. In such case, in form 16 period 03 to 06 also is populated with May challan details.

2. Payroll has been processed for an employee for a Financial Year. You have implemented AFY solution at your organization. While you are generating Form 16 for such an employee, Form 16 is not displayed. This happens because if FY for which Form 16 is being generated is not a leap year FY end date is taken as 29.02.XXXX.

3. Payroll has been processed for an employee for a Financial Year. When an employee has been rehired, the Perquisite amounts in Form 12BA in Form 16 has been found inconsistent.

You have activated AFY at your organization. You are generating Form 16 of an employee for FY 2012-2013. In this case, FY dates shall come as 01.03.2012 to 28.02.2013. However, end date is picked up as 29.02.2013 which is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1715724
Topic	Ptax : Additional Wage type for Professional Tax Basis
Version	1
Valid since	21.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.06.2012 10:29:01
Priority	Correction with Low priority

You have configured certain additional payment or bonus payment and using the rule INPB to cumulate these onetime payments for calculation of professional tax basis for different states (Ex Bihar).

If you want to add a new additional payment wage type then you need to do the necessary modification to the rule INPB

6 PDF attachments along with this note for manual steps

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1715724
Topic	Union Budget 2012 Corrections
Version	5
Valid since	08.06.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	08.06.2012 05:25:30
Priority	Correction with high priority

This note delivers the corrections related to Union Budget 2012.You are executing the payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization with 'Section 80 Deductions' Infotype (IT0585) maintained for Preventive Health Checkup.

It is being observed that preventive health checkup amount does not qualify within the overall limit for different categories (Self & Parents). Hence the exemption amount is getting calculated inconsistently.

There is one manual instruction along with this note

Prerequisite : SAP Note : 1706872 ,

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1718496
Topic	Employees Not Selected For Challan Mapping Of Offcycle Tax
Version	2
Valid since	30.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	01.06.2012 08:13:53
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

During challan mapping (Tcode: PC00_M40_CMAP), the system does not select employees who have certain offcycle payments when the switch for correction run has been activated in the system. This is incorrect.

You have activated correction run switch at your organization. Certain employees have offcycle payments and tax has been deducted for those payments, respectively. When you map challan for such offcycle payroll runs, the corresponding employees are not getting selected through challan mapping utility.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1710817
Topic	Form-7PS: Display Of Year Inconsistent On Page 2
Version	2
Valid since	30.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	01.06.2012 08:13:30
Priority	Correction with Low priority

While generating Form 7-PS (Tcode: PC00_M40_PNY) for employees working in your organization, the system displays incorrect year for 12th period on page 2 of the form.

You are generating Form 7-PS of an employee for financial year 2011-2012. Once form is generated, it is observed that the year displayed on page 2 of the form is incorrect. For 12th period, the year displayed is March 2011, however, it should have been March 2012. This behavior is incorrect.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1711193
Topic	Inconsistent Income Tax Slab Rates in Notional WT /4T1
Version	3
Valid since	30.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.05.2012 08:19:56
Priority	Correction with High priority

You are executing cross financial year retroactive payroll (PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for an employee who is eligible for Section 89 relief calculation.

/4T1 wage type stores the tax rate and the amount on which the system calculates tax, based on the income tax slabs. In case of cross financial year retro, payroll cumulates the slab rates of both financial year into the same /4T1 entry, which is inconsistent.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1716393
Topic	Multiple Company Code Transfer - Form 16 in TAN Based Report
Version	4
Valid since	18.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.05.2012 07:53:58
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing PC00_M40_F16 to generate Form 16 for the employee who has been transferred to different company codes multiple times within a FY, where TAN based Reporting is active.

In case of two company codes having the same TAN number, only results of first company code is appearing in Form 16, which is inconsistent.

For Example:

Employee is transferred multiple times as below.

From 01.04.2011 to 31.05.2011 in Comp Code 'IN01' with Tan 'T1'.

From 01.06.2011 to 31.01.2012 in Comp Code 'IN02' with Tan 'T2'.

From 01.02.2011 to 31.03.2012 in Comp Code 'IN02' with Tan 'T1'.

The current system behaviour shows only the results of Company code T1 in From 16. Ideally it should display the latest result in the company code T1.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1718988
Topic	Form 24Q Annexure II (Salary and Taxdetails)
Version	3
Valid since	23.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.05.2012 07:27:14
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.

On execution, it is observed that employees who are not present in the organization during FY for which Form 24Q is generated are also getting displayed under 'Salary and Tax details' tab.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1716511
Topic	Form16: Details displayed inconsistently
Version	3
Valid since	17.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.05.2012 06:36:37
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organzation. You are not using challan mapping utility (Tcode:PC00_M40_CMAP) for mapping the monthly taxes of the employee to be submitted to Income tax authorities.

There is a provision provided in Form 16 to upload the tax details for each of the months via .txt file upload as per specified format. However, in case you are trying to execute Form 16 with file upload, Annexure A/B details are not getting displayed consistently.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1720035
Topic	HINCANN0 Report Shows Inconsistent Result For Correction Run
Version	2
Valid since	28.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.05.2012 08:40:24
Priority	Correction with medium priority

Consider that you have activated the 'Correction Run' switch and you are executing Annual report (HINCANN0) for displaying payroll results of employees working in your organization. Also consider that though correction run results are not available, other results such as regular or offcycle results are available. However, the report does not display any result. This is incorrect. Even if correction run results are not available, the report must display other available results.

Payroll has been processed for an employee and you are executing Annual report for displaying payroll results (Tcode: PC00_M40_ANN0). You have activated correction run switch in your organization, however there are no correction run results available. In such cases, report does not display any result and generates an error message

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1720052
Topic	Batch Program For Section 80 & Section 88 India Inconsistent
Version	2
Valid since	28.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	28.05.2012 10:14:59
Priority	Correction with low priority

While executing Batch program for Section 80 and Section 88 deductions (TCode: PC00_M40_S80 & TCode:PC00_M40_S88) for employees working in your organization, infotypes are not updated consistently.

Batch programs (HINIS880 & HINIS800) for India are used to select or deselect 'Consider Actuals' checkbox in IT0585 & IT0586 infotypes. You are executing these batch programs to select 'Consider Actuals' checkbox. After batch sessions are processed, this checkbox is not getting updated in the infotypes.

Employee has Section 80 and Section 80C maintained in the master data. You have executed batch program for selecting the 'Consider Actuals' checkbox. However, checkbox remains deselected even after batch programs are executed.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1708534
Topic	Increase in number of challans displayed during a month
Version	1
Valid since	25.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.05.2012 05:32:50
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing challan mapping utility (TCode:PC00_M40_CMAP) for the employees working in your organization.

In case there are challans present in the system which had been used for mapping the tax deductions of the employees during past 12 months and still has balance amount left, such challans will be selected and displayed for mapping the taxes of the employee during current period/s.

The maximum number of challans that may be displayed is currently limited to '30'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1682754
Topic	New Payslip for India Payroll
Version	1
Valid since	09.02.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.05.2012 04:18:30
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

New payslip for India payroll layout inconsistent

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1367469
Topic	PPF investment limit under section 80C is Rs 70,000
Version	2
Valid since	03.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.05.2012 04:18:52
Priority	Correction with High priority

According to a Government notification, a limit of Rs 70,000 has been fixed for exemption under the Sec 80C for the investment under the head Public Provident Fund (PPF).

Currently, there is no limit on individual heads of investments which are considered for Sec 80C exemptions.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1706762
Topic	Form 16 annexure is not displayed in ESS ITS services
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	25.05.2012 04:18:36
Priority	Correction with High priority

You are generating Form 16 for an employee using ITS enabled services HRESSIN_F16.

After executing the application, annexure page of Form 16 is not getting displayed

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1709621
Topic	PF Form 5 - Father's name is not displayed in correct format
Version	2
Valid since	24.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.05.2012 09:46:47
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing the Employee's provident Fund report Form 5 (Tcode: PC00_M40_EPF) for the employee. After executing the report, the Father's name is not getting displayed in the correct format under column (4).

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1716511
Topic	Form 16:Tax details via file upload displayed inconsistently
Version	3
Valid since	17.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.05.2012 12:56:15
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organzation. You are not using challan mapping utility (Tcode:PC00_M40_CMAP) for mapping the monthly taxes of the employee to be submitted to Income tax authorities.

There is a provision provided in Form 16 to upload the tax details for each of the months via .txt file upload as per specified format. However, in case you are trying to execute Form 16 with file upload, Annexure A/B details are not getting displayed consistently

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1665344
Topic	Company name is not displayed completely on Form 16
Version	2
Valid since	10.01.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.05.2012 11:02:38
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

The company name/employer name is of length more than 40 characters. However, Form 16 displays only 35 characters. Hence the complete name of the organization doesnt get reported completely incase the length of the name is more than 40 characters

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1687077
Topic	E-File Consolidation for form 24Q serial number inconsistent
Version	2
Valid since	23.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.05.2012 11:02:15
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing E-file consolidation program (TCode: PC00_M40_F24C )for consolidating the different E-files generated using Form 24Q report (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) into a single E-file to submit the returns to Income Tax Authorities.

On executing the report, it is observed that the consolidated E-file is not displaying the records in the correct sequence.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1682736
Topic	Full name of employee gets truncated in ESI Form 5
Version	2
Valid since	23.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.05.2012 11:01:53
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

On execution of ESI Form 5, the name of employee is not being displayed as maintained in Infotype 0002.
The Full name of employee is not displayed and gets truncated in ESI Form 5.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1714398
Topic	Employer Address Displayed Inconsistently On ESI Form 5(new)
Version	2
Valid since	18.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	21.05.2012 12:32:40
Priority	Correction with low priority

While generating ESI Form 5 (Tcode: PC00_M40_ESIF) for employees who are working in your organization employers' address is not being consistently displayed on form.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1718008
Topic	Form 24Q:Deductee details not displayed consistently for Ee
Version	2
Valid since	18.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.05.2012 10:26:56
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.

On execution, it is observed that line items are getting displayed inconsistently. Ideally, three line items shall be displayed on executing the report for any quarter for an employee. However, there are more than three line items getting displayed as the line items are getting repeated.Also, this inconsistency is only observed on executing the report for multiple employees.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1716096
Topic	Form 24Q: Senior citizen category not displayed correctly
Version	3
Valid since	18.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.05.2012 09:44:30
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.

Salary and tax details (Annexure II) displays category of the employee based on their age. The same is displayed while reporting tax details and filing it to Income Tax authorities. In case of senior citizens, the category tyoe is not picked and displayed consistently.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1715703
Topic	Form 24Q:Multiple Ee's not displayed in deductee details
Version	1
Valid since	07.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.05.2012 10:40:35
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for employees working in your organization.

However, on execution, it is observed that details related to only one employee are displayed in deductee details on Form 24Q.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1712811
Topic	Ee's not selected for TAN based reporting on Form 24Q
Version	2
Valid since	07.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.05.2012 09:44:23
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F2Q) for the employees working in your organization during fourth quarter of a FY using TAN based reporting functionality.

On executing the report, it is observed that employees are not getting displayed on Form 24Q output. Instead, an error message is displayed - 'NO valid records found for employees belonging to this selection criteria'.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1710499
Topic	Annexure II not displayed for Ee's with no tax in quarter 4
Version	8
Valid since	07.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.05.2012 09:19:11
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for quarter 4 for employees working in your organization. You have also activated the BAdI (HR_IN_TAX_F24Q_CHECK) to filter out the records with zero tax deductions during a quarter.

On execution, it is observed that zero tax deduction records are not getting displayed. However, Salary and Tax details on Annexure II shall be displayed in case tax deductions has happened during any of the previous quarter/s. On executing the report with BAdI implemented, salary and tax details are also not getting displayed.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1710061
Topic	Form 24Q inconsistent for TAN based reporting
Version	2
Valid since	07.05.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	07.05.2012 08:37:50
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization based on TAN based reporting functionality.

Report generates results consistently for first, second and third quarter of a FY on execution. However, on executing the report for the fourth quater of a FY, no results are getting displayed. Instead, an information message is displayed -" No valid payroll records found for employee's belonging to this selection criteria".

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1694970
Topic	Provident Fund FORM3A-Exit Employees
Version	2
Valid since	05.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	03.05.2012 09:03:21
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are running PC00_M40_PFY for an exited employee. The employee has a PF deduction in one of the previous periods but don't have any PF deduction in the last period (in the period of exit). In this case the while running FORM3A the details displayed is not consistent and the same entry is repeating for all the periods for which payroll has been processed.

For Reference:Consider an employee has Provident Fund contribution Rs 1000/- in 12/2011 period. After this his PF contribution was zero (Loss of pay) in 01/2012 & 02/2012. The employees exits on 13th June 2012, the PF contribution was zero for 03/2012 period. But the report displays 1000/- for all four months when report is executed for 2012

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1674796
Topic	CIT address not getting displayed completely on Form 16
Version	2
Valid since	06.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	02.05.2012 05:16:54
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization. On execution, Form 16 details of an employee are displayed in PDF format with truncated CIT address. The CIT Address is of more than 35 characters. However, Form 16 PDF layout displays only 35 characters. Hence the complete address of CIT doesn't get reported on PDF layout.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Note Number	1699884
Topic	HINCF160:Issue in printing customer specific text on Form 16
Version	3
Valid since	30.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.04.2012 10:40:28
Priority	Correction with High priority

You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.

BAdI: Print Customer Specific Text above Form 16 Header - has been provided to print customer specific text on Form 16. However while generating Form 16, it is observed that default employee number or customer specific texts are not getting displayed consistently even though the BAdI has been implemented in the system.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1677261
Topic	Form 16: Changes for separate company code based reporting
Version	2
Valid since	29.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Advance development
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	24.04.2012 07:51:35
Priority	Correction with medium priority

As a part of SAP standard delivery, Form 16 is designed to display the latest payroll results for a particular FY. This means that retroactive payment, if any, or other master data changes done for a particular period are accounted to that period itself. However, the monthly tax liability of the employee on the retroactively changed amount is not accounted to the same period during retroactive payroll execution. It will subsequently be calculated and accounted to the period which is getting accounted (IN-PERIOD) now on payroll execution. In case, an organization follows the practice where retrospective payment and the tax on retroactively paid amount needs to be accounted to the same company code ,which is then also submitted to Government by the same company code, current Form 16 design will not be able to support this requirement.

For reference: Consider an employee is associated with company code A for 3 months in a particular FY. Payroll for all the periods has been executed consistently.Employee is transferred to other company, say company code 'B', from beginning of the next period. Now, any retroactive payment done for

previous company code is accounted to that company code. However, the tax is reported in company code 'B' for the retroactive payments done.

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1699337
Topic	TDS On Income From House Property Inconsistent
Version	2
Valid since	29.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.04.2012 05:59:36
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

While executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization, employees who have Income from House property with TDS on house property maintained in Infotype 0584, TDS on house property is not being calculated consistently.

Consider an employee who has Income from house property say, Rs.150000. Let us say that, TDS amount on house property maintained in IT0584 is Rs.500. However, on executing payroll, TDS on house property is not getting calculated consistently.

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1683812
Topic	Bihar Professional Tax Reports
Version	1
Valid since	13.02.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	23.04.2012 05:48:07
Priority	Correction with high priority

From the financial year 2011-12, the act of Bihar Professional Tax has been introduced under which any person who is employed in that state is liable to pay professional tax.

Following reports are delivered as part of standard:

(1) PT-IV: Every employer shall furnish to the prescribed authority a statement in form PT-IV, containing details of the tax deducted by him for a year, on or before 31st November of every year. To generate the form, you must specify the payroll period as the 6th period on the selection screen.

(2) PT-V: Every employer depositing tax shall furnish to the prescribed authority a statement in form PT-V, containing details of the tax deducted by him, on or before May 31st of every year. To generate the form, you must specify the payroll period as the 12th period on the selection screen.

(3) PT-VI : Every employer deducting tax shall issue to the employee from whose salary or wages the tax has been deducted, a certificate in form PT-VI. To generate the form, you must specify the payroll period as the 12th period on the selection screen.

For the year 2012 a new wage type is introduced /3P5 to capture the annual professional tax basis which will be reported in the respective forms.

For Bihar the region code has to be "04" for the calculation and functionality of reports to work properly.

These reports take care of rehire and mid-period transfer cases from 2012 onwards.

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1703920
Topic	PY-IN : Sec89 - Wrong Tax Code for senior citizens
Version	3
Valid since	18.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.04.2012 09:54:09
Priority	Correction with high priority

The tax slabs are not correctly picked if sec89 is activated for senior citizen during payroll run

If you are running payroll retrospectively for cross financial year for active employees or separated employees who are senior citizens (as on the

end of financial year)then system picks up the income tax slab inconsistently.

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1709087
Topic	Form 24Q inconsistent for payroll area based execution
Version	4
Valid since	20.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	20.04.2012 08:01:07
Priority	Correction with medium priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for fourth quarter for the employees working in your organization based on payroll area.

On executing the Form , Salary and tax details (Annexure II) is displayed inconsistently.

Few employees which does not belong to the particular payroll area are also getting reported on Annexure II.

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1698906
Topic	Form 24Q : Q4 Result inconsistent when processed.
Version	3
Valid since	19.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	19.04.2012 11:22:10
Priority	Correction with high priority

Form 24Q processed for Q4 of FY 2011 does not give any output whenprocessed with all the possible information.

.........................................................................................................................................................

Number	1707396
Topic	Form 24Q: Begin date displayed inconsistently on Annexure II
Version	2
Valid since	18.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	18.04.2012 08:28:24
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization to generate Annexure II (Salary and Tax details)

during fourth quarter of a financial year.

On execution, it is observed that start date of the employee/s who has joined the organization in middle of the financial year is displayed

inconsistently on Annexure II

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1706872
Topic	PY-IN: Union Budget Changes for Year 2012
Version	3
Valid since	17.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Legal Changes
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	17.04.2012 17:14:57
Priority	Correction with high priority

This note include new tax slab for financial year 2012-2013

Introduction of a new section, 80TTA

Introduction of a new sub division under 80D(2A)

Manual Changes

New Slabs to be created SL27 to SL30

V_T7INT1

SL27 Income tax rates for men 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

SL28 Income tax rates for women 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

SL29 Income tax rates for senior citizens 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

SL30 Income tax rates for very senior citizens 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

V_T7INT3

SL27	1	200,000.00	0.00	INR
SL27	2	500,000.00	10.00	INR
SL27	3	1,000,000.00	20.00	INR
SL27	4	99,999,999.00	30.00	INR
SL28	1	200,000.00	0.00	INR
SL28	2	500,000.00	10.00	INR
SL28	3	1,000,000.00	20.00	INR
SL28	4	99,999,999.00	30.00	INR
SL29	1	250,000.00	0.00	INR
SL29	2	500,000.00	10.00	INR
SL29	3	1,000,000.00	20.00	INR
SL29	4	99,999,999.00	30.00	INR
SL30	1	500,000.00	0.00	INR
SL30	2	1,000,000.00	20.00	INR
SL30	3	99,999,999.00	30.00	INR

Creation of new line item in tables

V_T7INI5

18 80TTA Interest from savings bank account

V_T7INI7

18 9.999.999,00 INR 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

V_T7INI8

18 1 Interest from savings bank account (Sec 80TTA)

V_T7INI9

18 1 10,000 100,00 INR 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

V_T7INI8

02 05 Preventive Health Check up

V_T7INI9

02 05 5,000 100,00 INR 01.04.2012 31.12.9999

Courtesy SAP

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1708083
Topic	ESS: Form 16 is not generated for TAN based reporting
Version	1
Valid since	16.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	16.04.2012 12:43:03
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 16 from ESS portal(Webdynpro Java application) for TAN based Form 16 reporting.After executing the application, an error message is displayed in the initial screen of the application as 'No data has been found for the specified selection'.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1688799
Topic	HINCALC0:NPS Employer contribution calculation inconsistent
Version	3
Valid since	13.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	13.04.2012 08:41:33
Priority	Correction with high priority

Employer's contribution u/s 80CCD shall be treated as an exemption while calculating the annual tax liability of the employee.

Also, employer's contribution u/s 80CCD will be over and above the limit of 100,000 INR under chapter VIA for the employee.

Changes to implement NPS soltuion in the system are delivered via SAP note 1661843 (NPS:Contribution To Central Govt Fund By Employee & Employer). However, following inconsistencies might be observed after implementing NPS solution release via SAP note 1661843:

(1) Employer contribution is not getting added to salary income of the employee.

(2) Total contribution & deduction under section 80CCD under point 9 (c) is not getting reported on form 16 in case IT0585 is not maintained.

(3) Deduction value is inconsistent in case only percenatge value is maintained in IT0587 (Provident Fund Contribution) for NPS contribution.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1698187
Topic	HCM - Union Budget 2012-2013 Announcement
Version	3
Valid since	09.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Announcement of Legal Change
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.04.2012 08:24:11
Priority	Recommendations/additional info

SAP will be releasing the changes as required by April 16, 2012 ,as per earlier version it is expected to release on 10.04.2012

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1670993
Topic	F24Q inconsistent when more than 9 actions performed on empl
Version	3
Valid since	06.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	10.04.2012 07:09:37
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing Form 24Q (Tcode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for employees working in your organization with multiple Form 16 activated.

In case there are multiple actions performed on employees in IT0000 and the count is more than 9 times in a particular financial year, on execution of Form 24Q an error message : "Unable to interpret "*" as a number" gets displayed.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1697226
Topic	Form 16 annexure is not displayed in ESS application
Version	4
Valid since	04.04.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	04.04.2012 04:32:28
Priority	Correction with high priority

You are executing the Form 16 application under Employee Self Services ESS) in portal.After executing the application, annexure in Form 16 is not getting displayed in PDF.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1700919
Topic	EPF efile related changes
Version	2
Valid since	30.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.03.2012 05:53:58
Priority	Correction with low priority

When EPF report is executed for efiling then the employee number is getting truncated with the right most digit.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1598608
Topic	ABAP runtime error COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW in MP state Payroll
Version	6
Valid since	30.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	30.03.2012 05:12:52
Priority	Correction with high priority

You have a employee who has been rehired or terminated belonging to the state of Madhya Pradesh.While executing payroll, runtime error 'COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW' has been encountered.

This issue is reported during Professional Tax calculation in payroll run.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1692891
Topic	Form 24Q e-File Header Record Length Invalid With FVU
Version	2
Valid since	29.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	29.03.2012 08:53:02
Priority	Correction with Medium priority

In order to file the TDS returns online, Form 24Q is generated (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q). After list of employees is generated, e-file is downloaded through SAP system and saved on the local server. Before filing the returns, this e-file needs to be validated through the File Validation Utility present on the Government website: www.tin-nsdl.com. Only when the file is validated through this Utility, it can be submitted to the tax authorities.

.........................................................................................................................................................................

Number	1700919
Topic	EPF efile related changes
Version	1
Valid since	27.03.2012
Reason and Prerequisites	Program Error
Release Status	Released for Customer
Released on	27.03.2012 10:07:31
Priority	Correction with low priority

When EPF report is executed for efiling then the employee number is getting truncated with the right most digit.

Recently Released PY-IN Notes:1952523 - HINCALC0: /4MI inconsistent in rehire retro scenarios / 1950425 - HINCALC0: Section 80GGA of Income Tax Act Still Valid / 1942663 - HINCALC0 : Employee NPS Contribution

IDoc Basics For Functional Consultants

LSMW for Functional Consultants in simple step-by-step way

Pricing procedure Steps and Details in SAP MM