Hi,
for hide ESS field, if you are the system administrator,
go to Content Administration > Portal Content > tab browse > portal content > content provided by SAP > end user content > ESS > iviews
go to iview that has estimated cost field, right click go to priview
then click CTRL + Right click at estimated cost field, then you can set visibility as invincible
field will invincible at user page.
hope it helps.
Thank you for your reply.
I am trying to do this but with in the Iview folder there are only 2 iviews. None matching that of the Create Travel Request page. I can't seem to find that Iview.
Search the iView with its technical name then. It's "com.sap.pct.erp.ess.12.request". It's in the EHP2 Travel Folder.
I disagree with using the personalization-approach.. it will be client dependant and might cause trouble when transported...
Cheers, Lukas
Greetz,
First of all, it isn't a good idea trying to attract people to post with points... because you wouldn't want point-fanatics to randomly post all over "do the needful for the same" or the like...
BTT: I believe you have taken a look at TA FITVFELD_WEB (T706Z) for Variant PL --> Web Interface Travel Request --> Estimated Costs. Good shot but still useless because here you can only hide a documentation field.
Here are a few possibilities to hide the estimated costs:
Technically in the WebDynpro Component they are ESTIMATED_COST_LABEL (label) and ESTIMATED_COST_FIELDS (transparent container)
1. You can use the component configuration FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA_REQUEST in WDA Component FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA and set the above said UI-Elements invisible. I didn't use this approach because you'd have to modify the standard Comp- Conf of SAP.
2. You can use Administrative Personalization, i.e. ctrl + right click and hide things. I didn't do this either because it sometimes is buggy when transporting. Still a possibility.
3. You can do it coding-wise with an enhancement in WDA Component FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA. This is what I did, because I like coding-approaches best.
method Z_INVIS_EST_COSTS . DATA: lo_el_la_est_costs TYPE REF TO cl_wd_label. DATA: lo_el_tc_est_costs TYPE REF TO cl_wd_transparent_container. lo_el_la_est_costs ?= wd_comp_controller->z_go_view->get_element( 'ESTIMATED_COST_LABEL' ). lo_el_la_est_costs->set_visible( EXPORTING value = '1' ). *CALL METHOD lo_el_la_est_costs->bind_visible * EXPORTING * path = ' ' * . lo_el_tc_est_costs ?= wd_comp_controller->z_go_view->get_element( 'ESTIMATED_COST_FIELDS' ). lo_el_tc_est_costs->set_visible( EXPORTING value = '1' ). endmethod.
Each one of the approaches has advantages and disadvantages but all three work. Choose one you like ;-P
Cheers, Lukas
