Characteristic Relationships

Peter Lance Mar 22, 2012 5:38 PM

Currently Being Moderated

Hi All,

We are using both BPS & IP in parallel. We have “Characteristic Relationships” on the BPS side and are using BPS frameworks (CL_RSPLS_CR_EXIT_BPS) to re-use what is already implemented in BPS in IP

There are many steps on the BPS side using Attributes , DSO & Exits. Currently we have implemented all these steps on the IP side using the BPS frameworks. Exits have some complexity and we prefer to use the BPS frameworks for these steps in IP

My question –

Will it be better to implement steps that are based on the Attributes & DSO directly using IP functionality rather then using BPS frameworks?

I appreciate your input.

Regards,

Peter

Re: Characteristic Relationships

Balajee Sivakumar Mar 23, 2012 4:11 PM (in response to Peter Lance)

Currently Being Moderated

Hi Peter,
It is always better to implement IP using it's own frame work as that would better on a long run. BPS framework will not fail or throw error but if you have the time and resources, I advice you to implement characteristic relationship using IP framework itself.
Regards,
Balajee
Report Abuse

Like (0)
Re: Characteristic Relationships

Andrey Uryukin Mar 25, 2012 10:45 AM (in response to Peter Lance)

Currently Being Moderated

Hi.
Surely, IP functionality is preferred.
Which complexity you have with an exits ?
Exit characteristic relationship in IP is pretty simple dor implementation and very flexible.
Best Regards.
Report Abuse

Like (0)
- Re: Characteristic Relationships
  
  Peter Lance Mar 28, 2012 4:22 PM (in response to Andrey Uryukin)
  
  Currently Being Moderated
  
  Hi Andrey,
  I appreciate your response. Do you have sample code for the Exit?
  Regards,
  Pete
  
  Report Abuse
  
  Like (0)

Go to original post