PO-MIGO-MIRO vs. PO-MIGO-F-90

[Former Member]

Hi,

I did the following scenarios for purchasing & paying for an asset:

> PO-MIGO-MIRO

> PO-MIGO-F-90

What is the difference between MIRO and F-90? I mean besides processing.

How does F-90 affect purchasing docs, GR status, and reports? Will the PO be cleared/closed?

Thanks!

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi

Incase you do transaction from F-90, the GR and PO will not get closed. It will also lead to incorrect accounting entries. Therefore, if you have made a PO & GR, do from MIRO route.

regards

Parag Bhargava

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Why would accounting entries be incorrect? for both cases, accounting entry from MIRO is same as F-90 posting:

DR 70 Asset

CR 31 Vendor

DR 40 GST

Please enlighten. Thanks!

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

When there is a PO you need to use MIRO and not F-90

The posting from the G/R from the PO is.

GR

70 Asset 100

50 Gr/IR account 100

Invoice MIRO

50 Gr/IR account 100

31 Vendor 100

When there is prices differences it will be posted normal on the asset

What you then want to do with F-90? When there is a PO the invoice should always be posted with MIRO assigned to the PO! Other wise you have problems with your GR/IR account and the PO still expect an invoice!

[srinivasa_maruvada]

Hi

Main difference is

Use MIGO/MIRO etc if you post asset through MM module.

Use F-90 if you post asset through FI if data in MM module is not require.

Cheers

Srinivas