Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Reg- Users in Gray status in SCUL

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

while doing the SCUG, and subsequently during the daily actyivities. I found that users are in Gray status in SCUL.

And when I execute the distribute manually for each user, it is becoming green.

what have to be done for making this distribution smooth.

Kindly share your views in this regard.

Thanks,

Subhashini,

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Bernhard,

Thanks for your reply.

It is exactly the same, the status in the child system is 64 for 561 idocs...

In the central system everything is in 03 status, so is it fine if i schedule a BG job in child system alone.

I will check the notes first.

Thanks,

Subhashini.

4 REPLIES 4

Bernhard_SAP
Employee
Employee
0 Kudos

Hi Subhashini,

I suggest, that you check the status of the idoc for such a user with grey status (unconfirmed) in the child system. Propably its '64'. In such case you can set up the customizing of inbound processing to automatically schedule a job for inbound processing.

SAP note 399271 gives a good overview, 555229 and 734576 from ALE side....

b.rgds, Bernhard

.

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Bernhard,

Thanks for your reply.

It is exactly the same, the status in the child system is 64 for 561 idocs...

In the central system everything is in 03 status, so is it fine if i schedule a BG job in child system alone.

I will check the notes first.

Thanks,

Subhashini.

0 Kudos

-->555229 gives the clue :

Table TEDEF:

Field EVENTT with value TRFC-IDOC and field ROUTID with value

BATCHJOB

-->Remember, that the RFC user needs then additional authorizations for creation/release of that jobs.....

b.rgds, Bernhard

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Bernhard,

Thank you so much for the reply.

I have given the mentioned authorization to the communication user used in RFC.

and then the synchronization worked perfectly.

Thanks for your help. it resolved my problem.

Thanks and Regards,

Subhashini.