SWCV and namespace MessagesInterfaces

[Former Member]

Hello all,

I have some doubts about Messages Interface used in BPM.

BPM just used Abstract Message Interfaces, but to expose the Interface to sender aplication, XI need the same Message Interfaces that is declared abstract but no abstract.

My question is how the Business Process Engine that the Outbound Message Interface, that my application is using, is the Abstract Interface that activate my Integration Process???

Regards,

Luiz

[moorthy]

Hi,

Just to add on , this blog may help u -- /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm

Regards,

moorthy

[Former Member]

hi,

when you are passing any data from sender system to BPM and from BPM to receiver system,

you will create receiver determination from:

Sender to BPM

BPM to Sender

Now sender will habe one MI which will be outbound sync/async interface and the BPm will have one Interface which is abstract.

Both of them will have the same Message type.

Regards

Vijaya

[MichalKrawczyk]

hi,

>>> XI need the same Message Interfaces that is declared abstract but no abstract.

not if you use IDOCs or RFC (then you don't need a message interface which

is not abstract)

>>>>My question is how the Business Process Engine that the Outbound Message Interface, that my application is using, is the Abstract Interface that activate my Integration Process???

In ID you specify only those that have direction (so inbound or outbound)

and they are used in BPM

BTW

all message interfaces (either abstract or with a direction)

use the same message type too

Regards,

michal