on 02-15-2005 9:38 AM
I am trying to build a RRI to ME33K which is the contract display screen.
Within RSBBS I have created the RRI to the transaction and
I have entered the following under detailed assignment:-
InfoObject: 0Contract
Type: 3 Table Field
Field: EVRTN
Selection Type: Single entry
Required Entry: ticked
Data Element : EVRTN
Domain: EBELN
The RRI takes me to the correct mapping but the contract number is not being mapped across. Could this caused by the fact that The field that is being mapped to is a structure or am I missing something obvious?
I am also assuming I don't need to use the user exit mapping as this is a direct one-to-one mapping ?!?
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Many Thanks
Shep
Although this is an old thread maybe this solution might be useful for some developers.
We had the same problem and solved this by using transaction ME33 instead of ME33K. For us the below field assignments worked. If you use standard content replace ZPVA_CON by infoObject 0Contract.
Make sure the users are authorized for transaction ME33 in the source system.
Kind regards,
Benno Mateman
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Shep.........
Try to give your info object (0contract) under free characterstics so that ur problem may get solved.......
Try this....? and let me know......
Regards....
KK
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hai..Shep.......
Try with set /get parameters in Assignments Tab.
kk
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Mr.Shep.....
According to u ME33k is not taking input from ur source .
for this
Specify the parameter ID for the receiver transaction. with out this information as no input help is available. You can find this parameter ID in the under data elements in se11.
Check it once.....Wheteher it works or not...
Regards
KK
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
i don't know from which object you're juming in BW, but if you are jumping from a Cube who has <b>direct</b> update and transfer rules to the R/3 system, you can just give the InfoSourcename in the overview screen of the RSBBS and you don't need to maintain the detailed assignment...
Even if you don't have direct update rules from your Cube/ODs at this point, you might still try to create 'dummy' update rules to for example the 2LIS_02_ITM extractor (it would be enough to only map 0CONTRACT) first and then maintain the RSBBS as i said above.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Tom,
Thanks for the reply. The problem with just using the overview screen is that the infobject 0CONTRACT is linked to field KONNR in the transfer rules (which I've assigned in overview screen). Therefore I need to override this within the detailed assignments to get it onto the correct field in ME33K.
Cheers
Shep.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.