Characteristic Relationships

[Former Member]

Hi All,

     We are using both BPS & IP in parallel. We have  “Characteristic Relationships”  on the BPS side  and  are using BPS frameworks (CL_RSPLS_CR_EXIT_BPS)  to re-use what is already implemented in BPS in IP

There are many steps on the BPS side using Attributes , DSO & Exits.  Currently we have implemented all these steps on the IP side using the BPS frameworks. Exits have some complexity and we prefer to use the BPS frameworks for these  steps in  IP

My question –

Will it be better to implement  steps that are based on the Attributes & DSO directly using IP functionality rather then using BPS frameworks?

I appreciate your input.

Regards,

Peter

[Former Member]

Hi.

Surely, IP functionality is preferred.

Which complexity you have with an exits ?

Exit characteristic relationship in IP is pretty simple dor implementation and very flexible.

Best Regards.

[Former Member]

Hi Andrey,

           I appreciate your response. Do you have sample code for the Exit?

Regards,

Pete

[balajee_sivakumar]

Hi Peter,

   It is always better to implement IP using it's own frame work as that would better on  a long run. BPS framework will not fail or throw error but if you have the time and resources, I advice you to implement characteristic relationship using IP framework itself.

Regards,

Balajee