on 07-16-2012 6:16 PM
Our development Solution Manager system is MT2. Our production Solution Manager system is MT1.
I successfully
built a ChaRM prototope within MT2 using these clients: 001 (Solution Manager), 401 (DEV), 402 (QA), 403 (PRD).Now that the prototype was a success it is time to move on and configure the production landscape using MT1, DT2 (DEV), QT2 (QA), PT1 (PRD). A transport route was set up between MT2 and MT1 so that Solution Manager configuration could be transported accordingly. I started my configuration and do have it saved in transports. I now have a request to give a ChaRM demo to the project team and will have to use the prototype built within MT2 to do so.
However, when I tried to reactivate the prototype (transport domain, etc.) I received errors in the set up of a new project before I could activate ChaRM. I am receiving the following message: Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape. When I run the Consistency Check I see the following:
I have tried many things to correct the issue. I have deactivated DOMAIN_MT1; deleted the transport route between MT2 and MT1; removed MT2 system from MT1 in transaction STMS. If a run the Consistency Check on an old project, one created while I was building the prototype, that project becomes part of DOMAIN_MT1, otherwise all of the projects created while I was building the prototype are part of DOMAIN_MT1.
Can someone please help me correct this issue?
Thanks,
Shawn
This issue is now resolved. I was missing RFC connections to client 000 of MT1, which is the domain controller now. In my original prototype, when MT1 did not exist, MT2 was used as the domain controller.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Still an issue. To review:
In your experience, is this possible? Can MT2 include a transport route for MT2:001 to MT1:001, as well as a transport route MT2:401 to MT2:402 to MT2:403?
I had such a landscape working before MT1 was in place, but now I am receiving errors during synchronization of the system landscape. Please see below.
Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape
Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N101
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during synchronization of the system landscape.
Procedure
Call transaction SLG1, and select the main object /TMWFLOW/CMSCV to view the application log. This contains the error logs for errors that occurred during synchronization of the system landscape.
Possible causes of the error are:
For a detailed error analysis, run the consistency check for this project, with "Check".
Once the error has been resolved, the system landscape has to be synchronized again.
Results from the "Check".
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Shawn,
Can you paste the screen shot of the logical compoenent page in MT2. It looks like something has changed in the log comp. which is causing this.
THanks,
Jagadish.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I was thinking that now when you moved to the Production landscape (DT2, QT2 and PT1), a seperate solar project would be created for them with separate logical component, separate IMG projects in the managed system etc. From the above screen I understand that project was for the testing scenario only (with 3 clients on the SolMan itself).
Regards,
Srikishan
Hi,
We had a similar scenario and found it easier to create a domain link between the SolMan landscape domain controller and the actual production landscape domain controller (for eg. ECC landscape domain controller).
The reason you get the error could be - in the system landscape tab in solar_project_admin, you would have provided the logical component which covers only DT2, QT2 and PT1 systems as the logical component would be product version specific. Hence the SolMan system is mentioned as not known as there is no logical component covering the SolMan systems which has been added to the landscape tab for the project.
Regards,
Srikishan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.