on 08-30-2012 9:18 AM
Hello All,
We have a requirement to derive the functional area during the settlement of internal order. WE have written a substitution to check if the IO is not blank and Order type is 01 (for IO) and accounting indicator is not balnce, then the functional area should be derived based on the IO table.
This substitution is being called at the time of settlement but the IO field in COBL structure is coming blank, hence the prerequisite is not met and derifvation of functional area is not happening correctly.
Does anyone knows, if it is a standard SAP behaviour and how IO number can be passed to COBL structure during settlement run.
Thank you in advance.
Jyoti
Hi,
Substitution during settlement has been restricted. Please, refer to note 317894.
Regards,
Eli
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Eli for your quick input.
I have checked the note and the note is applicable upto application 4.6. We are using ECC6.0 EHP5. Also the notes table about the restriction on changing the sender. We have written the substitution to get the functional area.
We have written the similar substitution rule for service order, there it is working fine. The issue is to find the correct way of populating COBL structure during settlement.
Do you have any idea on exit/ enhancement that can be used to populate the COBL structure during settlement.
Thank you
Jyoti
Hello Eli,
In our process, if there is a service requirement, a service order is created from sales order, which acts as a cost object. All the cost reletaed to service arhe booked on tis service order, which is then settled to the sales order. At the time of settlement, we have put similar enahncement and it is working fine in that case.
In case the service order is created from CRM, an internal order is created, which carries all the costs. When we are settleing the cost on IO, we need to have the derivation of functional area based on accounting indicator, it is not happening.
Regards
Jyoti
Hello,
Hmmm... The fact that I/O does not even get to COBL is disturbing. There is an SAP note which corrects the situation for WBS, but for I/O it should work at least to this level, i.e. data should be flowing to COBL. If you are absolutely sure, that it's not the case, I would open OSS message.
Regards,
Eli
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.