on 04-10-2014 8:38 AM
Hi Team,
UAR request contains items which are not directly assigned to users/roles,
Example: child roles of composite roles
We are on GRC SP13.
1807552 - UAM: UAR request shows indirect roles and wrong usage count
1821101 - UAM: User Id missing from provisioning log for UAR requests
1865864 - UAM: Wrong data in UAR Request & adding Expired Roles filter
1829331 - UAM: Issues with UAR requests
I have went through the above four SAP notes and all are part of SP13.
I just want to know if anyone has faced the same issue and whether the below note is applicable for our GRC system SP13 or not.
1970118 - UAM : Expired and locked Users and indirect role assignment are also display in UAR request
Please suggest
Regards,
Madhu.
Hi Madhu,
The latest note that fixes this issue is 1970118. It is part of SP 15 and all other notes would be it's requirement.
Implement this note and it should resolve your issue. Else you can create an OSS where one from us from the Development team can help you with this.
Regards,
Shweta
SAP IMS GRC
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Shweta,
We have implemented SAP note 1970118 in our system and still we are facing the same issue. Earlier request used to contain all child roles of composite role, now only few child roles of composite roles are coming in UAR requests.
Is there any fix for this issue?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Madhu.
Hi Madhu,
what you discover is only top of issues with user access review on SP13.
I would strongly go to SP14 as many other functionality are not working:
- save button destroys the reviewer decisions
- forwarding without return after 2 iteration is no longer possible
- provisioning is not working in case you use save button
Any many other smaller issue - to summarize doing UAR review with SP13 is a disaster - you should take whatever possible to go to SP14.
Filip
Hi Filip,
Thanks for the details. I already proposed to upgrade to next SP and we will soon be upgrading to SP14.
So, whats your take on SP14? SP14 initially, I heard lot of bugs in it and later most of them got rectified.
SP13 has so many bugs and you are exactly right its very bad (disaster ). Can you highlight if there are any specific issues in SP14 which we may need to know before moving to SP14?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards,
Madhu.
Hi Filip,
We have upgraded to SP15 and we also have issue with the Copy request functionality.
Could you please let me know if you have fixed the issue and if it has been resolved?
My issue is when using the Copy request functionality i see that the new request does not bring the role data from the old request and also when changing to an new but existing user ID it does not populate user details.
Please advice.
Thanks
Lakshmi
Hi Madhu,
I would recommend to go for SP14, we had similar problems on SP13 (with this and other UAR functionalities). We have tested UAR on SP14 and so far no issues noted.
Best regards, Andrzesj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.