on 07-22-2014 3:11 PM
We need to perform mass asset master record changes in Production (for example mass change of cost center, plants, etc.) and I found that this is done by defining substitution rules (GGB1), which contain to which cost center to be changed, then running worklist with AR01, AR31. But that means every time you want to do mass change in Production, you need to change the substitution rule and transport it in Production, which is not really an option. What is the best way to perform asset mass masetr record changes in Production?
Hi,
I think LSMW is a better way or a BDC recording through SHDB T-Code will also be an option. But for mass changes of Asset Master, its better to use LSMW. Recording to LSMW will not be more then half hour and the same you have to authorize not to all users but only to select users who are having authorization to change the Asset master.
Regards,
Malhar.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
YOu do mass change by creating Subsitution rules in OA02.
Please create your subsitution rule in OA02 and the run AR31 to do change
Subsitution rule need to transport and once they are in Production you can execute iN AR31 in production
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, but that means every time I need to do different mass change I need to transport different substitution in Production. For example this month I need to mass change 1000 asset cost centers, and then next month, change 2000 other assets to another cost center. It doesn't sound like good solution to me.
Thanks, Preety.
If it can be done with a set, that's good. But the set can be used as prerequisite, how can I use check in the actual substitution? I can use constant value, exit, or field-field assignment.
For example I need to mass change 1000 assets, so their cost centers are changed to 1000 different cost centers. How can I assign the relationships in a substitution and set? I can create a set with these 1000 assets, and say that my prerequisite is this set, but then how can I say in the substitution which asset which cost center should get?
HI ,
If chnage relation ship is 1:1 cost centre nd asset then you can 't use set . But if you 1000 asset out of 300 asset need same cost say X so you can create a subsitution rule with set . YOu can enter asset in set .
and then chnage the set for other say 200 asset which should have cost centre Y .
like this .
Prerequisite
ANLA-ANLKL IN Zasset set ' AND ANLA-BUKRS = '1200'
Subsitution
Cost Center | Constant value XX |
Hi Preeti and all,
I agree, LSMW is for sure more flexible, but then I need to give access to LSMW in Production to users and train them. So I would like to explore the substitution option if it is possible.
It is clear to me that I can change the set in Production to replace 300 assets with another 200 assets. But how can I change directly in Production the cost center to be substituted? Imagine that 300 assets have to change to cost center X, then 200 other assets to cost center Y. So I can change the set from 300 assets to 200 assets, but I can't change the cost center from X to Y, as the subsitutable field can be only constant value or exit, no option for set as far as I can see.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.