on 07-23-2014 12:37 AM
Hi Experts need immediate Help.
we are having the Data source 0bbp_td_sc_1 .When the particular shopping cart is edited multiple times on same day the sequence of changes comes wrong to delta queue from their to PSA.
Here in the above example .This is screen shot from PSA. Record number 903 is the latest but Record number 910 is getting overwritten the Record number 903.Means New record is getting overwritten with old record.
Hi Shaik,
Did you try the semantic keys in DTP which will ensure the serialization.Just mention the DSO key fields as Semantic keys and check.If it doesn't work please let me know i had another way to achieve.But this is the best.
Regards,
Rambabu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rambabu ,
I tired using semantic keys its not working.Please provide the other way of doing it.
You can reach me at sajeedsk@gmail.com
Hi Shaik,
Please make sure are there any time stamp fields are available in the extractor and is being updated for each record.If so in the start routine of transformation write the below code.
sort source_package ascending by dso-key1(as in ds)
dso-key2(as in ds)
.
.
.
.
timestamp field.
the above approach had its own limitation.in 99% cases it will work.
Regard,
Rambabu
We are in Version
Source SAP SRM 7.0
Target SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Shaik,
What is the final data you are seeing in the DSO? It should be the right numbers..
The delta type of 0BBP_TD_SC_1 DS is based on the type ‘AIMD’ (after images with deletion indicator via delta queue).
Check in your change log table and see how the records are updated in the DSO.
Check in SCN, there are more documents explains about the delta types .
Hope this helps...
Hi Suresh ,
Can you please help me with this. I read your analysis on SRM Flow.
I believe you can answer this.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3618078
Please reply me ,Eagerly waiting for your reply
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.