on 08-25-2014 9:41 AM
Hello all,
I need help.
I have a chain of processes which run in parallel three different DTP. DTP loads data from InfoProvider №1 in InfoProvider №1.
Process chain is started by an event that is theoretically chain may start at the same time but for different users with different values Filter DTP.
The problem is that if at the time of work DTP as user №1, runners start at DTP as users №2, not waiting for the end of the previous run of the same DTP, there is a lock:
Request 2923769 is already being processed
Message no. RSBK205
Diagnosis
You want to generate a new DTP request using data transfer process. However, request 2923769 for this data transfer process is currently being loaded or deleted.
System Response
The request can not be generated.
Procedure
Wait until the system has finished processing request 2923769.
Exception CX_RSBK_REQUEST_LOCKED logged
Message no. RSBK228
Why can not start same DTP on different filters and different users???
its common issue.
Once the previous dtp execution was finished then only 2nd user can trigger dtp(same)other wise lock issue will occur.
means you have different dtps with different filters?
is those are full or delta dtps?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Basically these kind errors will get when you are loading data into cube or DSO, at the same time when you are reading data from loading cube are DSO it occur same error and also.
These kind of error occur when you acitvate the data in DSO, if data is updating to some other targets.
So my advise is we need to wait up to Current run finish.
Please let me know if you need any more info.
If you are ok with my message please give some points.
Regards,
Satya.
No problem in starting the same DTP, but under different users with different filters.
I have installed:
Extraction Mode - FULL
Processing Mode - Serial Extraction, Immediete Parallel Processing
Also available processing mode - Serially in the dialog process. But this is obviously not what I need.
This implementation has worked for many years. But recently started having problems with blocking DTP. Apparently something has changed in the architecture of DTP. You do not know about this issue?
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.