on 08-27-2014 8:51 PM
Hi SAP Experts,
We have controlling currency 10 (Company Code currency) in PRD system. We got new company codes to add in same Controlling area. New company code currency is MXN and Controlling currency is 10. My question is if I change controlling currency to group currency (30).Does it effect any thing is system. I changed it in QAS and DEV systems I dont see any difference or any problem with this settings.Let me know about this change.
My company is using 10(Company Code currency) in PRD system because controlling area is belongs to US companies only. But with new company codes i have to assign same controlling area to company codes. where my company codes currency is MXN.
thank you
Hi Mona,
I agreed with better approach with Separate Controlling area.
where as the Objective of Controlling area to report as Group of Company Code under single umbrella.
As you said your Controlling Area is belongs to US(let it report in that currency) irrespective of Co code Currency.(COZ in near future if you add 1 more Co Code you have to create another Controlling Area )
If a let you an example of my client.
Controlling Area Currency is USD.
30 Company Code has assigned to this Controlling Area with Multiple diff/diff currency.
Controlling reporting will generate @USD. as well as Company Code Currency.(INR/GBP etc....)
Company Code report (Statutory reporting @amount in LC).
Regd,
Khan.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Khan
This project is about Globalization where we need to use one controlling area for all other new company codes.
I like to ask one more thing for if I define 3 different currencies for company codes. As per SAP Standard we allow 3 currencies per company code. I defined following currencies
1. Local currency (MXN)
2. Group currency (USD)
3. Hard Currency (USD)
This configuration does it makes any help for controlling area. My concern that we want to MXN work under USA controlling area. As I mention in my discussion that I tested in QAS system I am not seeing any error with US postings and I dont see any issue with MXN company codes.
Please guide
Thanks
Mona
Hi Mona,
Yes you can maintain the 3 currencies to @company code level no issues.
As you said you tested in QAS it will not be a problem.
Is ML is activated in your system ?(then reporting of Hard Currency to COPA you have to customize the report Coz.iam not sure -i have not tested this scenario.
But in your case Group Currency & Hard Currency is the same no issues.
Regd,
Khan.
Hi Khan
I found one error due to change of currency that is in WIP Result Analysis. I found in QAS testing server.
I changed currency from 10 to 30. Now when I run t-code KKAX system is not updating Result Analysis for particular order.
I am getting following error.
Message no. KJ129 : RA data only updated in controlling area currency
can you please guide me
Hi Khan
My OKKP settings are as follow
Active Components / Control indicators
Active components
Cost Centers: 1 Component Active
Order Management: 1 Component Active
Commit. Management: 1 Components Active
Profit Analysis: 4 Component active for both types of profit analysis
Acty-Based Costing: Component not Active
Profit center Acctg
Projects
Sales Orders
Cost Objects
Other Indicators
All Currencies
Variances
CoCd Validation
where i am not seeing anything as diff. company code currencies
guide me as required.
Thank you
Khan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mona,
As Mr.Pravan said, better to use separate currency for controlling area.
Regards,
Mukthar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
It is better to go with separate controlling area for this situation.
As you said there is no problems in quality server, we need to check all the areas before confirming.
As per my view ,reconciliation is more flexible if you go with separate controlling area.
You can maintain single operating concern.
Check the feasibility of activating the material ledger.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.