on 09-01-2014 10:55 AM
Hello All,
Has anyone faced this issue earlier?
Let me explain it:
I found inconsistency in project cost reports. And as general practice I ran CJEN->CJBN->RKANBU01. Earlier when I checked CJI5,it was showing purchasers/requester name under 'user name' column in CJI5 report. After program RKANBU01 run, the user name(SAP id) is replaced with my user id.
Does is seem proper? (Technically, I am agree that the program has worked as it is designed) But it doesn't seem logical to replace requester id with other user id who runs this program.
As user can not have privilege to SE38 program run,and consultant has to run it as and when required. But, if it replaces some fields data with program executor name then audit may have question on it?
What other experts think on it, kindly share your views.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
was this change for all purchase line items or only where the recompilation effected?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.