cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

error message CJ067 and oss-note 124177

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

We are in a business where projects require cross company collaboration and it was our requirement to make this possible without having to create additional WBS-elements.

Earlier this year, we had meetings with SAP-Belux and from them we got the confirmation from them this was possible.

Indeed, during a proof of concept we were able to post actuals (expenses, activities, material consumption) to a WBS belonging to a different company code and/or business area and use intercompany resource related billing to create the intercompany invoices.

However when we want to apply the same principle in the creation of with sales orders assigning the sales order line items to the single WBS.

Here we face at first the problem that we got the error message CJ067. The business area of the delivering plant was not the same as the business area of the WBS. It was then that the SAP consultant from SAP-Belux implemented the oss-note 124177. This seemed to meet our requirements but when different currencies were involved we ran into the error message KI299.

When we posted an OSS-message for this issue, we got a reply that the note 124177 is actually a modification and thus not supported by SAP.

Our main concern now is to know if our requirement to have a single WBS and be able to link sales order line items with delivering plants belonging to a different company code/business area is or is not supported by SAP.

Thanks you for your input.

kind regards

Rudy Moneyn

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

DID you check whether OSS note 164708 is apllied to your system or not . becuase if that Note is applied then only SAP is not supporting .

Many Thanks

Regards

PreetI Agarwal

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks for your suggestion Preetl Agarwal and yes, since we are on 6.07 this note is included. But SAP-support explicitly refers to the fact that we implemented the oss note 124177 and that this is considered a modification.

Kind regards,

Rudy Moneyn