on 11-06-2014 7:15 PM
Hi Kenneth,
3 receipt-rows are indeed the standard setting.in Transaction TRIP.
This was caused by the additional receipt informations (sm30 V_T706B1_B) if you activate the field 'EDITOR' than an Editor with 9 lines apperas for you receipt.
Than there is not enough place for additional receipt rows- and you have to scroll down on the right side.
Best regards
Klaus
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Additionally to the WDA alternative Kim outlined, you should, in case you want to stay in the Backend with SAP-Transactions, use PR05 ( TA TRIP is obsolete ).
Cheers, Lukas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Aye. A lot of things didn't work out in FI-TV 😕
Take the Submodule for the planning for instance, FI-TV-PL. It's only being "maintained" by now without much manpower behind (IMHO) and will most probably be thrashed sooner or later and enterily be replaced by the so called "SAP external Travel Planning". I'll probably write a rant-blog about that topic soon.
TRIP is newer because it has been designed for the end user to be taken into the process, i.e. Travelers and Travel Assistants. It was kind of a means for interaction of end users (TRIP) and Power Users (PR05, TP01). However, then WDJ came around and replaced the backend transaction as UI-technology and now we have WDA (FITE_REQUEST, FITE_EXPENSES, FITV_POWL_ASSISTANT and so on).
EDIT: I stand corrected, Klaus! I should've said it has been replaced by newer UIs and shouldn't be used anymore if it can be avoided ;-P.
Cheers, Lukas
Message was edited by: Lukas Weigelt
If you're working in dusty public sector, though, and already have a working Travel Request / Expense / payout process with FI-TV on premise you would want to organically implement the planning process into that existing logic (Would have been sweet if they would have put just a little more work into FI-TV-PL). I don't see that happening with Cloud Services which will most probably involve stateless applications etc. Either go Concur or Citriq or whatever they're all called entirely/all the way or don't. Trying to marry one with them to FI-TV might get very messy ;-/
Cheers, Lukas
That is standard. The size of the window cannot be enlarged either. However, if you use Web DynPro, the max is however big your monitor is! You can view as many as will fit on your screen.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.