cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Trex GRC document connector "error while preparing"

former_member289578
Discoverer
0 Kudos

All,

after an upgrade to GRC 10.1, I'm trying to get the Trex search configured again for the GRC process control documents. In the connector admin cockpit of the embedded search, I create a connector for GRPC_DOCUMENT, but it fails with 'Error while preparing', see log below.

I can't seem to find any clues on what to do next for this message, the consistency check fails with Connector XX1100~GRPC_DOCUMENT~ is not prepared (no nodes/no requests)

The same connector is running fine in the Q environment.

Any helps is much appreciated.

Thanks,

Peter

11/26/2014 10:06:31 Job started

11/26/2014 10:06:31 Step 001 started (program ESH_SE_CONNECTOR_MOD_BGD, variant &0000000000016, user ID XXXXXX)

11/26/2014 10:06:32 Process Step: Preparation

Information Messages (1)

11/26/2014 10:06:32 Environment Details: TREX Version 7.10.58.00, Destination: TREX_DD0_RFC, SAP Release 740

11/26/2014 10:06:32 Process Step: Change inactive Connector Metadata

11/26/2014 10:06:33 Process Step: Update Search Runtime Storage

Information Messages (1)

11/26/2014 10:06:34 Prepare search object connector (COMRUNTIME)

Success Messages (1)

11/26/2014 10:06:34 -- ODP Indexes 11/26/2014 10:06:34 --------------------------------------------------

Error Messages (2)

11/26/2014 10:06:34 An exception with the type CX_RODPS_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND occurred, but was neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING clause

11/26/2014 10:06:34 Error while accessing metadata

Success Messages (1)

11/26/2014 10:06:34 -- ODP Indexes 11/26/2014 10:06:34 --------------------------------------------------

11/26/2014 10:06:34 Process Step: Rollback

Error Messages (1)

11/26/2014 10:06:35 An exception was raised

11/26/2014 10:06:35 Error(s) occurred during connector creation

11/26/2014 10:06:35 Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member217429
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi ,

could you please check if the note 2057219 is suitable for you.

Best regards,
Mikhail

Answers (0)