difference in S_ALR_87011966 (BY COST CENTRE) AND S_ALR_87011963 (BY ASSET NUMBER)

[Former Member]

Hi Experts

user is comparing both reports and below is the difference they are finding S_ALR_87011966 (BY COST CENTRE) AND S_ALR_87011963 (BY ASSET NUMBER

the balance result for both reports are different as below screen shot:

report	Acquis.val.	Accum.dep.	Book val.
S_ALR_87011966 (BY COST CENTRE	286,495,013.06	-136,223,423.18	150,271,589.88
S_ALR_87011963 (BY ASSET NUMBER)	285,746,785.45	-135,501,555.56	150,245,229.89

what could be the reason for these differences , how can we find out please guide me

Thanks

[João_FI_FIN-CS]

Hi,

For both reports you've the option "Current book value". When you change the depreciation key, the system recalculate the planned depreciation but with normal option the report only can display planned depreciation before these changes.

Go to report and open the "All Selection" (+ signal) and select the option "Current book value". Run both reports and compare them with AW01N too.

JPA

[Marssel700]

Hi,

it means you are missing Cost Centers entries or there are Assets without cost assignment (or another cost collector)

Check table ANLZ.

Regards

[ivo_hladky]

Hi,

possible reasons:

• different selection values on selection screen?
• incomplete asset master data? That means cost center not assigned but used in filer
• missing access rights?

Ivo Hladky

[iklovski]

Hi,

Execute both these reports with assets' details and find out which asset(s) cause the difference. You cannot analyse totals efficiently.

Regards,

Eli