Problem in BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01

[Former Member]

Hi experts,

I need to do enhancement in MIRO tcode.

I have done implementation in BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 definition but when I am activation my zimplementation it says badi is already activated.

When I checked I saw standard FM_BADI_FDCB_BAS implementation is activated.

Now I cannot deactivate standard implementation as I dont know where it will effect plus I need to activate my implementation

I have not get any suitable solution in SCN and in GOOGLE.

Kindly guide me.

It is very urgent.

Regards,

Sandeep Singh

Message was edited by: Manish Kumar

[raymond_giuseppi]

Si you cannot use this BAdI in two implementation and are required to find another suitable BAdI, did you look for current implementation status of BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02, 03... 06?

Regards,

Raymond

[Former Member]

I have checked BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS05 definition is not implemented. My question is that if i cannot use BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01 then what is the use of it moreover if u have noticed that in BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02 definitation there are 2 standard activated. How is it possible because BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02 can also not be multiple used.

[raymond_giuseppi]

Those are old BAdI, I suppose there were no multiple option at this time?, or they were converted from some exits? (There was even an optimization note with some funny LOOP AT BADI statements.)

In my systems only one implementation is active for BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02 (*), nevertheless if some error(s) did occur during an installation, only one will be executed. You could raise an OSS message if two implementation are actually active, but look first at SPAU as well as implementation change log.

Regards,

Raymobd

(*) the first is a standard active, a second "example" implementation is inactive.

[Former Member]

Finally I have used BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04 for enhancement. Now the problem is the custom field I have inserted in MIRO is unable to save the value.. It automatically clears when i press enter or any other key..

I have added my custom field in RBKP, RBKP_V, INVFO, BKPF, VBKPF, ACMM_VENDOR_COMP.

What am I doing wrong.

[raymond_giuseppi]

Did you define INVFO with a TABLE statement in the top include of the subscreen main program, did you use FIELD statements, etc. (many possibility of errors, cCeck sample provided with BAdI)

[Former Member]

it is.. . any other suggestion?

[former_member182371]

Hi,

just in case, have a look at this old threads:

Best regards.