Payroll Issue

[Former Member]

Hello All

Facing issue in payroll run. Hired employee three period before and running retro.

Below Values are displaying. Total  payment and deduction is right but net pay is wrong.

Basic Pay 364.80 Basic Pay 729.60 Basic Pay 729.60 Basic Pay  729.60 Total Payments            2,553.60

Tax 382.72 EE Payable 204.29 Total Deductions        587.01

Net 3,425.79

We are getting below wage types also in last period (Period 04)

/550 Statutory n                                                       142.59
/552 Retro net a                                                     3,283.20
/559 Bank Transf                                                 3,425.79

Please advise in this.

Regards

SK

[jagan_gunja]

Is there a retro causing positive adjustments for previous period/s?

[Former Member]

Hello All

I have  below Value in DT table in Period04

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     01 2015   364.80

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     02 2015    1,094.40

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     03 2015     1,824.00

Current month basic pay 729.60 (period04)

/552 Retro net a 3,283.20

But /552 should have been 1824  (here it is appearing as 364.80+1094.40+1824 =3283.20)

Please let me know what is wrong and what to check. Just now we implemented HRSP.

Reg

SK

[jagan_gunja]

Do you have any custom PCR's or customized standard PCR's dealing with /551, /552. /A**, /Z**, etc the technical w/t's that deal with retro's?

[Former Member]

All

We are not using any custom PCR for retro and fully Standard PCR

In the last period (current) we are getting accumulated /551 like

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     01 2015 364.80

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     02 2015 1,094.40

/551     Stat. net. recalc. diff.   05     03 2015 1,824.00

But for another country which retro is correct i am getting individual /551 in all retro periods

Any clue

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

All

Any update in this.

Regards

SK

[former_member193652]

You know /551 is retro. amount in each period and /552 is total amount until that period.

So you expect to have total retro. amount in current period into /552. By the way, this is for positive retro. amount and in negative scenario you will have the total amount into /553.

For more information refer to my replies at:

[Former Member]

Hello All

Above post is about posting of the result but for us posting is not clearing also.

Because Total payment-Total deduction not matching with net pay.

Any suggestions in this.

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

Hi S K,

can you brief your issue, can you paste your error screen shot.

if you are facing posting error means for standard retro wage types also need to assign G/L accounts

[Former Member]

Hello All

Initial issue is not posting.

My issue now is net pay is more than Total earning-Total deduction.

Have explained in detail about issue in above threads. Kindly check.

We are using Std Schema for retro functionality and haven't  customized any single / wage types (550,551,552,553,559,560,562)

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

Hi SK

you are getting difference of 1459.20 (364.80 + 1,094.40)

cross check once the payroll processing and have you given any custom arrear wage types in the remuneration statement PE51.

[Former Member]

Hello Praneeth

I checked and not finding anything in payslip.

Also posting not clearing stating net pay more than earning.

Also for two period retro there is no issues.

Three or more period means net pay is increasing.

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

can you paste the payslip screen shot

[Former Member]

Hello All

Please find below screen shots during one, two and three period retros

single period retro is correct but two or more period retro is wrong in terms netpay

If retro is wrong then it should be wrong for all periods. please advise

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

hi sk,

i think custom retro pcr's are wrong. check once again the pcr's IN42, IN43, IN44 and in IN41 also check what are the wage types you assigned.

[Former Member]

Hello All

We are not using  any custom PCR or Schema for Retro.

Everthing is standard interns of retro.

Also how come one period retro is correct and more  than one period is wrong.

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

Hi SK,

in that case if retro is running how come Basic pay coming in the payslip line item as two or three times with amounts ?

check once pcr's in41 42 43 44 only used are any custom used. if std only used, check once changes done in std pcr may be.

[Former Member]

Hello All

Retro process for any wage type is happening in Scheme: Retro right.

Is there any other schema i need to check.

Also checked log only four Std PCRs are involved in this IE41,X048,X042 and X047

Payslip reflection is due to the CEDT variant

Regards

SK

[Former Member]

Hello Experts

Any update in this, please.

Regards

SK

[saphr_professional]

Hi SK, Please send me the screen shots to understand better for /560. What is the expected net pay and what is showing in /560 Please check master data if you have any social insurance contributions. Thanks you SAP HR Professional

[Former Member]

Hello All

PFA of screen shots. Pls through me some clue.

[venkateshorusu]

Go through log thoroughly you will get an idea Since as far i know system works fine until and unless we have not done implemented and manipulated the standard values i.e custom PCR etc.

Regards

Venkatesh