EKPO value not updated when post from ME59N but works ok in ME21N

[former_member220448]

Hi Experts,

I’m using CL_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST to do some validations and set EKPO- ELIKZ with X if true.

This is working fine from ME21N but it doesn’t seems to be working from ME59N, I see in the debugger that the value is set with an X even at the end of the POST Method.

My scenario in ME21N and ME59N is to set EKPO- ELIKZ when I converting from a Purchase Requisition.

So my question is:

What can be happening that its working ok in ME21N and not in ME59N?

Im not very familiar with ME59N, do I have to set any of the ME59N selection screen parameter beside Purchase Requisition #?

Thanks in advance!

1. Nico.-

[raymond_giuseppi]

I hope you are not modifying the demo class provided with the BAdI,n but you actually create a new implementation with SE19?

Do you use same order type in ME59N and ME21N, there can be a difference in their Customizing (status fields) ?

Regards,

Raymond

[former_member220448]

Hi Raymond,

Yes, of course I create an implementation of the Badi.

Where can I see the Customizing status fields?

Thanks.

Nico.-

[raymond_giuseppi]

SPRO : Purchasing, Purchase Order, Define Document Types and Define Screen Layout at Document Level.

Regards,

Raymond

[former_member220448]

ME21 ME21N is there in those SPRO path you send, but I couldn't find ME59N.

I set a break point at process_input_filter and field ekpo-elikz got a dot (.) so I guess its editable.

ME21N and ME59N both creates a ZNB PO, but through ME59N it does not set Delivery Complete with an X as its doing inME21N

Any hint?

Thanks a lot!

Nico.-

[raymond_giuseppi]

What is your version, I found an old note  632096 - ME59N Change of shipping data via BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST , where modifications by the BAdI were dropped, but it's an old note?

NB: in recent version the BAdi is even used to correct the difference between ME21n and ME59n, see 1758500 - T-code ME59N - PO item numbers are not sequential for an example.

Regards,
Raymond

[thanga_prakash]

Hello Nicolas,

Did you try by placing the watchpoint on the field EKPO- ELIKZ.

There might be another user exit or some enhancement which is making the EKPO- ELIKZ  as blank after you set X in your BADI implementation.

Regards,

TP

[Private_Member_424367]

Hi Nico,

Can you please share the solution for this issue ?