Inconsistency found while transaction for 412E mvmt type

[former_member187457]

Hi All,

We found some inconstancies while transacting for 412E movement type with ZSO1 Sale orders.

The following Observation with the above subject sale order w.r.t production server .

1)  1. For some items it is working fine and some items it give error called “Account determination for entry YABC AUM not possible”

2)  2.  we have checked Sale order data and we found all the condition are in line with our requirements.

3)  3.  Also, We checked materials master data and found ok.

4)  4.  One clue is, w.r.t Qty.,  movement type NOT worked for FULL QTY., But tried for partial Qty & worked for partial.

5)  5.  Now some cases of ZSO1 sale orders are inconsistent unable to post with 412 E document and dumps the above error.

sd         

          I got to know from other blogs that we need to change the AUM account assignment, but business FI team is not ready to make any changes in the exisitng assignments.

          Please suggest.

Is        Is there any option to change the Error message to warning so that it wont stop the movement.

          Thanks.

          RK

[former_member187457]

Hi All,

We are moving material from same plant but form normal stock to special stock.

And it is giving AUM error while doing so.

Please suggest.

Thanks,

RK

[former_member183424]

Please assign the G/L account for the transaction key AUM, then check is there any amount got posted for this transaction key. I am not sure but it could be a similar case which is explained in this KBA 1802639 - Account determination WRX in MM-Invoice for Non-Valuated GR

[former_member183424]

You can't make the error message to warning. It is happening for certain valuation logic.

You may can check these OSS note for the valuation logic :

180503 - Val. logic during transfer posting with reversal movem. type

399562 - Postings w/ value 0; Transfer posting w/ mvmt type 411, 412

[former_member187457]

Thanks for the input DP..

while debugging MB1B, it leads to FM 'MR_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT'.

and there it is checking table T030(Standard Accounts Table) and T030R(Rule for Determination of Standard Accounts).

In both tables there is no record exist for our Chart of account & AUM.

I guess we can maintain that using OBYC, but is it mandatory to maintian it??

Because it is working fine for qty 1, and the transaction key is coming as BSX

and when we give full stock, transaction key is coming as AUM in FM 'MR_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT' for the same material.

please suggest.

Thnx

RK

[former_member183424]

Test the same scenario in your development or quality client and check the same. Check how much amount got posted for AUM transaction event key. Then  you can able to understand the logic for valuation.

[former_member187457]

There is no issue in DEV & QAS, it is only occuring in PRD..

[former_member183424]

Is that mean, you have same data in development client (with same quantity, material price), but it is not hitting AUM transaction key. And in production system, it is asking G/L account for AUM transaction key.

Generally, system will use the receiving material price for the accounting entry.

The amount will be calculated as transfer quantity X receiving material's price.
Are you entering any external amount during 412 E movement type ?

AUM transaction key will be called when there would be different between transfer amount and receiving material's value.

[former_member187457]

Yes we have some data in QAS.

We are not entering any amount while doing 412E.

It works only with split quantity.

e.g.

We have SO with 5 qty.

and we do 412E for 5 qty...it is throwing AUM error.

but when we do 412E with 1 Qty and it posts without any error.

and further we can post 412E for remaining 4 qty.

[Former Member]

Please maintain details for transaction key AUM with chart of account.

Materials Management> Valuation and Account Assignment>Account Determination> Account Determination Without Wizard> Configure Automatic Postings

or Goto OBYC transaction and check in QA and PRD server. compare the missing details.

Check quantity also, may be open for delivery.

Check the details of 412 E in OMJJ, QTY has ticked mark or not.

[former_member187457]

Hi All,

We compared the QAS & PRD, didnt find any difference in OBYC.

In OMJJ , we have following settings:

and for enjoy field selection we have following settings:

Please suggest.

We tried changing 'GA amount to LC' to optional in OMBW, but it didnt work.

Thanks,
RK

[Former Member]

Dear Rahul,

Please check the setting as per screen shot.

for movement type 412, reversal is assigned or not.

For 412+E, last column check account assignment untick mark check

for 412 movement type Ref and TrR, TpR is assigned or not plz check.

[former_member187457]

Hi SK,

i checked as per your suggestion...

1. reversal are already assigned

2. account assignment is not ticked...

3. not sure about Ref/TrR/TpR....i will check and will get back to you....

Thnx

RK