cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Value Field in COPA

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos


Hi people,

Please, could you help us?

We have a situation about a settlement Order where go to COPA.

Inside this Order, we have our sales in the accounts "4" (values "positive" in the Order)  and when we make the settlement, it will go by account "7".

It means that this account will take value "positive" in the Order to make the order in zero.

This account 7 will go to COPA (by a value field x)

The question is, what is the reason this amount is shoed as a "negative"  value in this value field  "x" in COPA instead of "positve" as we have inside the Order at the moment it was settlemented?

There is some transaction that can have a configuration about the signal to the "value field"?

Thanks,

RN

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

ankur_kabir
Participant
0 Kudos

Is it revenue account? or some other condition type?

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello,

It is a account classe categroy 12 (Sales Deduction).

We are doing a settlement of our Order that has a settlement rule to COPA.

Thanks,

RN

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello,

Some other suggestion?

Thanks,

RN.

ankur_kabir
Participant
0 Kudos

I do not think, this would work the way you are describing.  Record type A and C will not cancel each other value out.  Are you trying to achieve that?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Your cost center segment is missing

Thanks

HA

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello HA, thanks,

But I didn´t understand.

I am doing a settlement Order. We aren´t  working with cost center at this moment.

Do you have some other suggestion?

Thanks,

RN

Former Member
0 Kudos

this means settlement order has not be closed properly

check the settlement % ,

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi HA,

The settlement is OK and was OK.

HA or People, some other suggestion?

Thanks,

RN

former_member207505
Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Nahas,

The general sign logic for settlement to CO-PA is described in attached

note 369378.

Https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/369378

In COPA, all values are usually updated as positive numbers - this means that

the plus/minus sign must be reversed during the settlement of revenues.

Usually the cost element category indicates whether a value should be interpreted as a revenue (Category 11/50/51).

Exceptions to this are accrued values (results analysis).

Since source cost elements are assigned to results analysis categories in the accrual,

these accrual categories are used to determine whether the plus/minus sign must be reversed.

However, accrued sales deductions are an exception to this.

This results in the following sign rules in case of settlement:

Plus/minus sign reversal for - revenues (source cost element category 11/05/51)    OR

                    - Valuated revenues from results analysis

                          (Results analysis category 75 -> BWER)

                      Except for sales deductions

                          (results analysis cost element 12)

More details, please refer to the solution part of note 369378.

Thanks and best regards,

Ronghua Fan

former_member304215
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello People,

Thanks for your return. I already read the Notes: 369378, 52849, 33178.

For the same account (deduction account) category 12.

Almost all of the documents were settlemented OK. Negative amount in the moviment, was settleded as a positive amount in COPA.

But only for some cases it not happend (two cases).

We wait at the moment we make the settement a "positive amout" in COPA, considering on the moviment was negative (category 12), but for these two cases, the amount was showed as a negative amount in COPA after settlement.

Do you know what happend?

Thanks,

RN.


former_member188063
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi RN,

If you're looking for Transfer condition values with +/- signs to CO-PA.

Below is the  overview of how condition values are updated in
CO-PA for billing documents from SD:

Billing document (normal) "With +/- sign"    "Without +/-
sign"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Debit posting                         negative           positive
  (such
as sales deductions)

Credit posting                        positive           positive
  (such
as sales revenues)

Credit memo/return       "With +/- sign"    "Without +/-
sign"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Debit posting                         negative           negative
  (such
as sales revenues)

Credit posting                        positive           negative
  (such
as sales deductions)

Also, take a look at Note: 52849 and 33178 which gives a detailed explanation about the signs.

Regards,
Sudhakar*