on 06-10-2015 2:44 PM
Hi BRF+ experts,
I just run the report FDT_CHECK_DB_CONSISTENCY (via transaction FDT_HELPERS) and get some erros like this one:
1 ENTRIES in A ( FDT_ADMN_0100S | ) DO NOT EXIST in B ( FDT_ADMN_0030S | ) |
The report FDT_CHECK_DB_WHERE_USED also reports that there are some missing "where used" entries.
Is there are a way to get rid of this inconsistency?
Thanks and cheers,
Martin
Hi Martin,
hard to say where the inconsistencies come from. Maybe this is due to unnamed unused expresions and data objects. In this case you can use the report FDT_APPLICATION_CLEANUP (in the TA FDT_HELPERS -> BRFplus - Deletion - BRFplus: Delete Unused Unnamed Expressions and Data Objects)
If this does not help you have to check the single UUIDs of the objects and the object versions that cause the trouble.
BR
Christian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
That does not necessarily mean there is a problem, e.g. the inconsistent entries may belong to a deleted object. You best open a message to have someone take a look at it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.