07-10-2015 10:16 PM
HI
We created a program pattern having different stages (Stage-I, Stage-II, Stage-III), and assigned the same to the Program of study in "Program data". Now while creating Module Group under the respective Program of study the system asks for "First possible stage of a Program". If our module group is "Semester-I" we want it to fall under the stage-1, so we assign the value "First Possible stage of a program" as "01". However if we go to transaction "PIQACSTAGEVIEW" it shows correct stages under a program of study, but the module groups are not falling under respective Stage nodes as we expected. The module having assigned the value "First possible stage of a program" as "01" was coming under the node Stage-1 as well as Stage-3. Also if we go on to change the value, the node structure does not change.
What is the importance of the field "First possible stage of a program" while creating a module group?? and is this the field by which system defines the structure of Stage display in the transaction "PIQACSTAGEVIEW"??.
Thanks in advance
Aatish Shukla
07-11-2015 11:00 AM
Hi Aatish,
the stages you enter as additional data on the relation 500, when you create module groups below an SC or modules below a module group are relative stage numbers. Also the length of a module group (infotype module group data) is relevant for PIQACSTAGEVIEW.
Let me give an example:
Hope this helps you to explore further and understand.
Regards,
Dirk
07-11-2015 11:00 AM
Hi Aatish,
the stages you enter as additional data on the relation 500, when you create module groups below an SC or modules below a module group are relative stage numbers. Also the length of a module group (infotype module group data) is relevant for PIQACSTAGEVIEW.
Let me give an example:
Hope this helps you to explore further and understand.
Regards,
Dirk
07-27-2015 9:45 AM
Hello Dirk,
Thank you for the reply.
It helped me understand how system determines stage patterns, however there is one issue with the transaction PIQACSTAGEVIEW.
After defining all the stage patters as suggested by you, I observe that the stage transaction shows every module twice under a stage.
Please suggest on this.
Thanks in advance.
07-27-2015 10:12 AM
Hi Aatish,
a module should only be shown more than once, if itself or a module group above of it is linked twice under the SC. So you should check this.
If you still doubt, you should provide more info, for instance a screen shot of the structure of the SC in PIQ_ACSTRUC.
Regards,
Dirk
07-27-2015 10:36 AM
Hello Dirk,
The hierarchy of the program of study is like this
SC>> Has a module group (Level)>> has a module Group (Stage)>> has a module.
The module is linked to SC and the module group Stage.
07-30-2015 9:42 AM
Hi Aatish,
from the screenshot I cannot deduce anything.
But you said, that you linked the SM to the SC *and* the module group (Stage). That is not necessary, since the modulegroup (Stage) itself is linked to the SC. Maybe this is the reason why the SM is appearing twice in the Stage View.
Dirk