on 11-18-2015 12:44 PM
Hi Experts,
Could you please help on this.
1. There are some inspection lots created from process order . Now the inspection lots are having REL, SPRQ status, but there is no stock existing in quality inspection mentioned in the inspection lot. Process order is also in TECO status.
Now i am unable to cancel the inspection lot in QA02 and QA32 tcode. The option is greyed out. Also not able to do the UD for the inspection lots. It is showing error " deficit ba stock."
I want to cancel the inspection lot to set status LTCA. could you please help on this.
You fail to mention what inspection types you are talking about.. an 03 or an 04 lot. You also need to tell us if the 04 lots are create as "early" lots at order release or tine of GR.
Until you tell us that, we really can't narrow down what you need to do.
Craig
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Did you explore the option suggested that you have to cancel the original material document that created this inspection lot? I read your first posting and have a query. You are saying that the status of inspection lot is SPRQ. This indicates that the stock posting is not yet done. And you are also saying that there is no stock lying in quality inspection. This is contradictory!! And you are also trying to make UD? If at all you want to cancel the inspection lot why you are trying for UD?
I suspect that there should be stock inconsistency issue. With such problem you always notice the mismatch between the quantities in inspection lot and in MMBE. 48815 note has the answer to it.
If your requirement is to cancel the 04 inspection lot then you should cancel the 101 movement document. Let us know about this as you try. Also if you can confirm that the lot is not an early inspection lot would be great as suggested Craig!
Anand
So I conclude that your requirement is to cancel the original 101 material document. Cancellation of the inspection lot is an effect of this. You are following the right method using MBST to cancel it. As you are unable to do that I suspect this as stock inconsistency issue. Always remember, for cancelling the document the inspection lot should be untouched. You should have not done any stock posting or Usage decision. Check below sequentially
Anand
Edited later_
How you are doing 101 movement? Through order confirmation using auto GR? If so, you might need to cancel the order confirmation in PP module that caused this movement instead of MBST.
Message was edited by: Anand Rao
You have to put the order back in released state, i.e. get rid of the TECO status. I believe the you can't run the MBST to cancel the material document because you closed the order and TECO'd it. Get rid of that TECO status, and then try the MBST to cancel the material document. That should then cancel the inspection lot provided you haven't done any stock posting on it or made a UD.
Craig
Even though quantity is not in QI but inspection lot status would have SPRQ because its a stock relevant inspection type (04).
For your understanding, you cannot cancel an inspection lot which is stock relevant using above method.
To cancel an stock relevant inspection lot, you got to reverse the material document which triggered the inspection lot generation. IN your case, it should be material doc for GR (mvmt 101).
NJ
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
As Mr Craig suggested, revoke the TECO status and cancel the GR document. It'll automatically cancel the respective inspection lot.
If you are using any stock relevant inspection type, system status will always have SPRQ into it no matter if you put the stock into QI or not. In this case, I believe, indicator is set off for 'post to inspection stock' for inspection type 04.
NJ
Hi Nitin, You are right on the status SPRQ part! I want to say 2 things here!
Secondly if we consider this as valid requirement, we all agree that the solution is to cancel the material document. Few more points on this context from my side_
BTW sorry for stretching it farther!
Anand
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.