cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

EhP7 Upgrade - Error in act_UPG --> PPH* Objects

stephan_probst
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hello,

we have errors in phase act_upg during EHP7 upgrade

Systemlandscape = Unix/Sybase

We did not found these objects in our system. In table tadir we see these objects with objecttype "DDLS " but it seems that our system not kmow DDLS??

Error in Logfile:


   A3 DDDLS 030XAktiviere Ddl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_1"
   A1EDSDDL_PARSER_MSG 010 Die Spalte "SGT_SCAT" ist nicht bekannt.
   A3 DDDLS 027XDdl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_1" konnte nicht aktiviert werden
1EEDO519 "Ddl Source" "PPH_DDL_AFPO_1" could not be activated

   A3 DDDLS 030XAktiviere Ddl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_PW"
   A1EDSDDL_PARSER_MSG 004 Das Basisobjekt "PPH_E_AFPO_1" existiert nicht oder ist nicht aktiv.
   A3 DDDLS 027XDdl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_PW" konnte nicht aktiviert werden
1EEDO519 "Ddl Source" "PPH_DDL_AFPO_PW" could not be activated

   A3 DDDLS 030XAktiviere Ddl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_RG"
   A1EDSDDL_PARSER_MSG 004 Das Basisobjekt "PPH_E_AFPO_1" existiert nicht oder ist nicht aktiv.
   A3 DDDLS 027XDdl Source "PPH_DDL_AFPO_RG" konnte nicht aktiviert werden
1EEDO519 "Ddl Source" "PPH_DDL_AFPO_RG" could not be activated

   A3 DDDLS 030XAktiviere Ddl Source "PPH_DDL_MDBS"
   A1EDSDDL_PARSER_MSG 004 Das Basisobjekt "PPH_E_MDBS_4" existiert nicht oder ist nicht aktiv.
   A3 DDDLS 027XDdl Source "PPH_DDL_MDBS" konnte nicht aktiviert werden
1EEDO519 "Ddl Source" "PPH_DDL_MDBS" could not be activated

   A3 DDDLS 030XAktiviere Ddl Source "PPH_DDL_MDBS_1"
   A1EDSDDL_PARSER_MSG 010 Die Spalte "SGT_SCAT" ist nicht bekannt.
   A3 DDDLS 027XDdl Source "PPH_DDL_MDBS_1" konnte nicht aktiviert werden
1EEDO519 "Ddl Source" "PPH_DDL_MDBS_1" could not be activated

Some ideas

Gruß

Toni

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member189797
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi All,

I would like to add here that in case you have shadow instance during the upgrade and face this issue, please use the report from KBA 2086899 to activate the objects.

Thank you.

Best Regards,
Gaurav

andrew-mccarron
Explorer
0 Kudos

This comment really should be bumped up as the correct answer.  I ran into the same issues in ACT_UPG and followed the instructions here and ran RUTDDLSACT - didn't see this comment.  The upgrade later failed in run_rsptbfil_inishd.  Fortunately I found that SDN thread and Gaurav was kind enough to point to this note. 

Answers (5)

Answers (5)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello, we are facing the same issue with PPH* objects.

We are not using a shadow instance, so directly I have ran RUTDDLSACT program with the option PHH_DDL_AFPO_1, but it ends with code 8:

The problem is that the view V_PPH_DDL_AFPO_1 cant be created in  the database so the DDL source is not activated.

I try to actívate the view in SE14 but it fails.

Same error with a lot of PPH* ddls.

Some idea?

Thanks for your suggestions,

Ana.

former_member189797
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ana,

Please try to repeat the phase some time first. If that do not work then please follow the KBA : 2086899.
Note says this report can be used for SPAM/SAINT case also which is similar to single system mode of SUM tool.

In case of error, please attach the screenshot of error.

Regards,
Gaurav

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks a lot Gaurav,

I repeated the phase only once and passed correctly.

Kind regards,

Ana.

r_reinders
Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

I had to repeat the phase 4 times till I had ONLY the next errors:

1EEDO519X"DB Prozedur Proxy" "PPH_V02_MRP_CHECK_SEL" could not be activated

1EEDO519 "DB Prozedur Proxy" "PPH_V02_MRP_COMPARE_MDPS" could not be activated

1EEDO519 "DB Prozedur Proxy" "PPH_V02_MRP_MAT_PLANT" could not be activated

   3 EDT014XActivate dependent table "M_PREMA"

   3 EDT015 Dependent table "M_PREMA" was not activated

   3 EDT014XActivate dependent table "V_7BR_PREMA"

   3 EDT015 Dependent table "V_7BR_PREMA" was not activated

   3 EDT014XActivate dependent table "V_T7BRAP"

   3 EDT015 Dependent table "V_T7BRAP" was not activated

The first 3 errors you can find in:

The last 3 you can find in note: 1909524

The 5th time I did choose "ACCEPT".

Unfortunately every repeat did take 4.5 hours, but it is very wise to do.

This was also a EHP7 upgrade (comming from EHP5) with the latest SPS (EHP7 SPS11)

Kind regards,

Ruud

Reagan
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

You should ignore the activation errors only if there is an SAP note suggesting you do so else you will run into problems in the later phases of the upgrade. I suggest you to raise an OSS message and get this checked with SAP as to whether you can ignore these activation errors and continue with the upgrade.

james_wong
Employee
Employee
0 Kudos

Hi Toni,


Could you please activate the DDL source with the report RUTDDLSACT

You can use PPH* to activate the objects.

Regards

James

== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==

Need help with an upgrade problem?

Check out accelerate finding upgrade solutions:

http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/x/6g3FGQ

== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ==

stephan_probst
Discoverer
0 Kudos

Hi All,

we did repeat the phase several times to solve this problem.

What can we do , that this not happened in the next systems??

Regards

Toni

former_member185239
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Stephan,

If you want to activate the above objects then , you need to create a column SGT_SCAT for the above objects.

Kindly follow the sap note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2201233

With Regards

Ashutosh Chaturvedi

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Toni,

We had a similar (not exactly the same) problem during an upgrade from ERP 2004. We initially repeated the phase and as we still had errors, we "accepted non-severe errors" and continued the upgrade.

We then checked to see if the objects were reported in the LONGPOST.LOG after the upgrade which they weren't.

MFG,

Amerjit