Your Very Own Favorite Discussion/s

[philipdavy]

Hi SCNer's

I would like to start a discussion thread here, with which I am hoping to bring your  best/favorite discussions in scn to the lime light. It would be nice to if you could elaborate more on for what reasons it has become your favorite discussion.

     I would like to kick start this discussion by adding my personal favorite.

1) My favorite discussion thread is For All Entries is NOT better than INNER JOIN in most cases which is written by Matthew Billingham.

2) The reason behind choosing this one is, this discussion has greatly (sadly still prevalent to an extent) influenced many ABAP developers in believing that Inner join is better than For All Entries and thus shattering a well known/notorious myth.

Please do share your favorite and let them keep coming.

Philip.

[philipdavy]

Adding to my favorite list...

   This is pure fun .

[philipdavy]

Any one has got any more to add ?

[BenedictV]

Whenever the internet bores me, I return to these two discussions for some laughs,

oh wait....does the favorites have to be a technically enlightening discourse/discussion

in which case I will pick any random 'FAE vs inner join' thread on SCN

[Jelena]

I have many favorites that are blog comments, but as far as the discussions go - can't beat this SCN classic: There is a rat in the kitchen what am I gonna d... | SCN

[caroleighdeneen]

That is indeed a classic! How funny, thank you for a good end of day laugh.

[former_member184555]

Here is my favorite thread.

http://scn.sap.com/thread/538712#4023826

[philipdavy]

Hi SCNer's,

Any one got to say anything about your favorite discussion   or am I the only one ?

[matt]

I'm really enjoying this one:

Seriously though, I don't have a favourite that I can remember. I've been involved in so many over the years.

[philipdavy]

Matthew Billingham

Yes I know you have been involved in many. But at the same time some discussion in which some one has given a real smart answer (You involved or Not).

[matt]

Your link refers back to your post. The correct link is

[philipdavy]

ok cool..No way to edit the already written, any way you provided with the right one.