03-23-2016 7:23 AM
Hi Experts,
Is it possible to stop Information container entries from being created during Dunning End Run?
I have set Information container for Dunning Level 3 and it works fine but additionally it creates entries during Dunning End Run.
I know this is a standard SAP behaviour but is there any Event or Configuration where I can stop this entry being created.
This is for SAP FS-CD.
Best Regards,
Chandan
04-11-2016 10:38 AM
Hello Chandan,
In the IMG Activity, Dunning: Specifications for Changes to Dunning Procedure/Dun, you define which combination of dunning procedures and dunning levels needs to be reached for the system to send a message to the information container. This combination also indirectly controls whether the system is to send a message to the information container about the ending or reinstatement of a dunning procedure. Example: Customizing contains an entry for the combination "dunning procedure key 10 and dunning level 3". For a running dunning procedure with dunning procedure key 10, which reaches dunning level 3, the system sends a message to the information container. If the dunning notice is ended or reinstated after dunning level 3 is reached, the system then uses the Customizing setting to recognize that a message has already been sent to the information container to say that dunning level 3 has been reached. The system then sends another message about the ending or reinstatement of the dunning procedure to the information container.
You can control the creation of info contianer, by copying the class 'CL_FSCD_INFCO_TYPE_V001', and reimplement the method 'IF_FKK_INFCO_TYPE~CHECK_REQUIREMENTS'. You need to thru the exception EX_NOT_FULFILLED if the Info Cat. V001: Process is '2'.
CASE ls_all-process.
when mc_process_proc_ended.
ex_not_fulfilled = 'X'.
ENDCASE.
Please award points if it helps.
Thanks,
Selva
03-25-2016 8:28 AM
Hi Chandan,
I am not sure of the requirements and could not get much from what you have mentioned. Anyways let me try and help you out. Maybe you can set correspondence lock during end dunning run activities with a Z FM. You can check out event 350 as well.
Usually after end dunning, all the blocks/ locks ( dunning as well as correspondence locks) are removed on account of payment received / balance is cleared, or on account of write off. But in your case it seems to be a bit different.
Thanks
04-11-2016 10:38 AM
Hello Chandan,
In the IMG Activity, Dunning: Specifications for Changes to Dunning Procedure/Dun, you define which combination of dunning procedures and dunning levels needs to be reached for the system to send a message to the information container. This combination also indirectly controls whether the system is to send a message to the information container about the ending or reinstatement of a dunning procedure. Example: Customizing contains an entry for the combination "dunning procedure key 10 and dunning level 3". For a running dunning procedure with dunning procedure key 10, which reaches dunning level 3, the system sends a message to the information container. If the dunning notice is ended or reinstated after dunning level 3 is reached, the system then uses the Customizing setting to recognize that a message has already been sent to the information container to say that dunning level 3 has been reached. The system then sends another message about the ending or reinstatement of the dunning procedure to the information container.
You can control the creation of info contianer, by copying the class 'CL_FSCD_INFCO_TYPE_V001', and reimplement the method 'IF_FKK_INFCO_TYPE~CHECK_REQUIREMENTS'. You need to thru the exception EX_NOT_FULFILLED if the Info Cat. V001: Process is '2'.
CASE ls_all-process.
when mc_process_proc_ended.
ex_not_fulfilled = 'X'.
ENDCASE.
Please award points if it helps.
Thanks,
Selva
04-27-2016 5:07 AM
Hi All,
The issue is solved by communication. Preventing creation of Info container entries can be done in many ways, but stopping it, is not the correct approach is what I decided. So the downstream system, in my case it was FS-PM, agreed to handle it accordingly.
But it is good to know the ways to stop creating info container entries and Selva has mentioned one such way out of other options.
Thanks for your time.
Best Regards,
Chandan