on 04-19-2016 1:06 PM
Hello,
I have a SFC given and I want to determine via WebService in which container the SFC is packed. I don't know whether the SFC was packed in a container or not, but I guess if not the WebService will give an appropriate answer. I am using SAP ME version 6.1.
My Use-Case is to unpack a SFC, if it was packed. For this I want to determine in which container the SFC is. With that information I can find the container member and with it I can unpack the SFC. I just tried some WebServices as readSfc but getting no information about the container.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks and best regards
Hanno
Hi Hanno,
If such method existed, it should belong to a container-related WS, not to SFC-related WS. For ME 6.1 I do not see such method.
You can check SAP ME Javadocs available at SMP - maybe something has appeared in the latest releases. If not, you can submit a ticket against MFG-ME-API component to consider a possibility to implement such method.
Regards,
Sergiy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Sergiy,
yes my first step was looking into a container-related WS like ContainerProductionServiceWSBinding. But there is always the entry point either the container or container member. So I couldn't find any operation to enter the SFC and get a status regarding the container.
So my thinking was maybe I get the information when I get a global status of the SFC, like readSFC or getSFCInformation or something in this kind, but in the answer there is never container data.
I checked just a lot (API), but couldn't find an answer, so I created this post.
OK maybe there is no such WebService, its possible, but maybe the WebService is a little bit "hidden" and not so obvious.
I just found one workaround. If I try to pack a yet packed SFC I get the error message "The SFC is packed into container XYZ". So I could parse the error text to receive the container. But if the SFC is not packed, of course I don't want to pack it. So this workaround seems not so good for me
Regards
Hanno
Hanno
The chances of this changing in a future release are minimal, unless you request this by opening a ticket against the MFG-ME-API component, as Sergiy suggests. Such a ticket will get acknowledged and closed, with no guarantee that it will be implemented, but it is the only formal method for requesting an API.
Stuart
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.