User Status Profile for Network Activity

[former_member769770]

Hi Experts,

We have a requirement to have user status populated for activities with specific control keys only and not for other activities or network header. Like if the control key is PS04, a set of user status should be visible and those statuses should not be visible at network header or activities other than control key PS04. Since we can assign the user status profile at network type, it'll be visible at header and all the activities. I tried to use substitution to meet the requirement that if control key = PS04, substitute status profile with a specific value but found that status profile field was not available for substitution at activity level. Can anyone please advise if it is achievable via standard (if yes, how) or we need to think of some enhancement/development to achieve our goal.

Thanks in advance,

Regards,

Mohammad T Haque

[sammar81 · Accepted solution]

Hi Mohammed,

This would need a small development. You are right you won't be able to substitute the status profile using standard.

Please provide the details to your Technical team mates to develop  it for you...

cheers

Sammar

[former_member769770]

Thanks for all the responses. I think we'll have to go the development way. Thanks again....

[kenmelching]

Like you pointed out the User Status Profile is set at the Network Header and not the Activity level, so you cannot have a different status profile by Activity without having different Network Headers.

You can use validations to make sure a certain User Status is not set on an Activity per the Control Key.  You would need some simple code.  This would prevent it from happening but the users would still see the possible statuses.

The other option is to create new networks by control key, this is totally possible within a project.

[Former Member]

Hi,

You can use user substitution along with user exit for this.

Prereq for substitution will be your control key and substitutable is user exit with logic to update selected statuses.

Thanks

Raghu Kumar

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

Hi Mohammed,

Check if the field is included into the structure AFVGD.

In that case maybe you can add it into GB01, Boolean class 75.

Regards,

Paulo

PS: It is not part of AFVGD, it is JOSTD-STSMA

Message was edited by: Paulo Vitoriano