cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Absence reporting over consecutive weeks?

Former Member
0 Kudos

We are currently attempting to produce an adhoc query (we have been unable to find a pre-built report with this function) which reports  absence over 14 consecutive weeks.

Currently, some of our absences are input as separate records (i.e. the employee may be absent from work Mon-Fri, then confirms on Monday they will not be at work). So if the records are the following:

StartEndAbsence Reason
04/01/201608/01/2016Sickness
11/01/201615/01/2016Sickness
18/01/201622/01/2016Sickness
25/01/201629/01/2016Sickness
01/02/201605/02/2016Sickness
08/02/201612/02/2016Sickness
15/02/201619/02/2016Sickness
22/02/201626/02/2016Sickness
29/02/201604/03/2016Sickness
07/03/201611/03/2016Sickness
14/03/201618/03/2016Sickness
21/03/201625/03/2016Sickness
28/03/201601/04/2016Sickness
04/04/201608/04/2016Sickness
11/04/201615/04/2016Sickness
18/04/201622/04/2016Sickness

Is there a way of comparing this with the planned working time (which knows when the employee should be at work), to show that this absence has been one spell lasting over 14 weeks? As opposed to 16 separate absences?

I've also thought if there's a way of reporting on working time and attendance, to see if there's a way of seeing if an employee hasn't attended work for over a period of 14 weeks.

Any ideas would be much appreciated.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

venkateshorusu
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Go through below link it helps you to provide a report after modifying the schema.

We can check 14 consecutive weeks as well and then provide consolidated information.

Regards

Venkatesh

jagan_gunja
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Try txn PT65 for a period covering a few days on both sides of the whole period (here from say 1.1.2016 to 24.04.2016)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Jagan - we tried this. Unfortunately the weekends still appear as breaks in the chain. Is there a way of displaying the times in which the employee wasn't due to be in, so it shows a continuous line? If so, PT65 would be really useful.