on 02-15-2011 3:55 PM
Hi all,
I have configured 3 sick leave quota and assigned it to 1 deduction rule hence to 1 Absence type.
But 1st quota is fully paid 2nd is half paid and third is unpaid, for that i used Valuate Absences after Quota Deduction option from customizing in table T554A with 3 different Counting Classes for Absence Valuation.
But wen i run payroll it is giving me the following error No entry in table T554C. Now that i have assigned a valuation rule to my absence type in T554C it is not considering configuration in table T554A and deduction salary for all 3 quotas as same.
I don't understand the link between Absence type and quota in the customizing of Absence Valuation.
I have also maintained X for function RAB in the schema. Please advise, what could be wrong.
Thanks.
read here absence quota deduction detemines how it is evaluated
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/71/4c47114c4611d1890b0000e8323d3a/content.htm
IN absence valuation we define different rules for processing absences in payroll. You can specify which calculation basis should be used to valuate a paid absence, and also that that allowances are granted for certain absences, while others involve deductions.
For example, you can:
Specify bases for determining salary reductions for an unpaid day of absence
Determine a fixed vacation allowance per day of absence
Specify how an illness should be valuated
Determine that an absence should be valuated using an average salary to be defined at a later stage
Specify processing methods for special requirements
There are four different methods of valuating absences. You can use one method, or a combination of several methods.
The following provides an introduction to the four methods.
1. Form counting classes for factoring:
Absences which are not paid, or only partially paid, lead to a reduction in salary.
Example: Employees who have taken unpaid leave should be subject to a reduction in salary.
2. Valuate absences using the 'as if' principle:
The absence is valuated as if the employee had worked.
Example: If employees are absent due to incapacity to work and are being paid, they should receive the same bonuses for working on Sundays and public holidays as they would if they were actually at work.
3. Valuate absences using averages or constants:
The number of absence hours, absence days, calendar days, payroll days or payroll hours is entered in the number field of the wage type.
Example: The average amount of overtime worked by the employee merits a supplementary vacation allowance.
4. User-specific calculation:
If the standard methods of absence valuation are not adequate for your purposes.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the reply,
I am aware of the 4 methods of Valuation, and i am using, 1. Form counting classes for factoring.
I have also read the Technical Procedure for Absence Valuation link provided by u, from that what i am trying to do it this:
"If parameter 3 of function RAB contains the entry X, the absence valuation rule can be changed using the Breakdown of Absences after Quota Deduction table (T554A). In this way, you can implement a special absence valuation that is dependent on the quota from which the absence is deducted".
But as mentioned earlier it is not considering configuration in table T554A and deduction salary for all 3 quotas as same.
For Ex: i have 3 quota
01 Full paid
02 Half paid
03 unpaid
And i have only 1 Absence type
0001 Sick leave
The quota gets deducted according to the deduction rule. Now when the absence valuation is done it is considering table V_554S_G. where as i want it to consider table T554A.
Hi Sikindar,
It think you will know, request your assistance.
Thanks.
The link Between Absence type , Quota with Absence Valuation will be the Valuation Rule where if the absence is Paid or unpaid
Before going to the configuration can you please let us know about the below points
1.Do you have Time evaluation or No time evaluation
2.As said by you the
For Ex: i have 3 quota
01 Full paid
02 Half paid
03 unpaid
When this has to be happen in the Payroll where in case 2 and 3 even though the employee is haveing enough Quota does his salary has to be Reduced as the Rule
Yes this can be done in standrad with slight change in the Configuration
in case if you dont have TE
Configure Three Valution rules with
01 Full paid
02 Half paid
03 unpaid
and assign this valuation rules for the absence types in V_554S_G and test and dont go for any other changes
Thanks for your help sikindar,
1.Do you have Time evaluation or No time evaluation
Yes, i am using a copy of TM04 fro TE ans the status i am maintaining in IT0007 is 7 & 9 and i have tried for both employees with status 7 & 9 but did not work.
When this has to be happen in the Payroll where in case 2 and 3 even though the employee is having enough Quota does his salary has to be Reduced as the Rule
Which ever quota the leave has been deducted from the valuation should be according to that.
Ex: If quota 01 Full paid has 2 leaves left and i am applying for 4 leaves then the remaining 2 will be deducted from 02 Half paid, and i have done this configuration through deduction rule & it is working fine.
And when i run payroll is run it has to valuate 2 days full paid and 2 days half paid but it is valuating full paid for all 4 days.
Configure Three Valuation rules with
01 Full paid
02 Half paid
03 unpaid
and assign this valuation rules for the absence types in V_554S_G and test and dont go for any other changes
I have configured three "Absence valuation rule:Counting class"
05 Full paid
06 Half paid
07 Unpaid
But i cannot assign more than 1 valuation rule to my absence type in V_554S_G as i have 1 absence type only.
But i have assigned the 3 Valuation rule for my 3 different absence quotas in table T554A but it does not work and when i run payroll it always checks & valuates from table V_554S_G.
I wonder what is wrong, If there is an option it has to work.
Thanks in advance.
I have assigned the sequence for the quota type already, the config is as below.
Table V_554S_G
PSG A/AType Start Date End Date Val.rule Cat I
01 SICK 01.01.1900 31.12.9999 05
If i don't assign 05 here it gives error in payroll "No entry in table T554C".
Table T554A
Val.rule PSGpg ESG AQTyp No End Date Start Date Val.rule Text Quota text
5 1 3 07 1 31.12.9999 01.01.1990 5 100% paid Sick Leave Full Paid
6 1 3 08 2 31.12.9999 01.01.1990 6 50% paid Sick Leave Half Paid
7 1 3 09 3 31.12.9999 01.01.1990 7 Unpaid Sick Leave Unpaid
why should we assign Valuation rule 2 times here, 1st column & 8th column.
Thanks.
Hi Sikindar,
i have the almost same problem with absence quota valuation & i posted a question with the following link:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3353520
could you please help me.
Thanks
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.