cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

KO22 - Internal Order Budget Availability Control to include Revenue Element

chengshiong_kwan
Participant
0 Kudos

Dear all CO experts,

Is there any way we can set the Budget Availability Control to take values from Revenue Elements into consideration?

Currently users are posting to Statistical Internal Order using Revenue Element where Cost Element Category = "12" (Sales Deduction).

And since currently there are many GL with CE Cat. = "12" which can be posted to the Internal Order, it's not advisable to create new set of GLs with new CE Cat. = "1".

Any expert has experience on this?

Is there any user exit that can be used?

Thank you in advance.

Rgds,

Sebastian

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

miya_wang
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hello Sebastian,

In standard, revenue cost elements are not subject to budget check as shown in KO23 > Extras > Availability control > Analysis (report BPFCTRA1 (Note 392730)).

It is standard behaviour that the entries in RED colour will NOT contribute to the assigned value, for example:

    V: Value type not relevant (<> Act./Plan/Stat.Act./Stat.Plan/Commt)
    😧 Delivery
    S: Settlement to object with no budget control
->  R: Revenue cost element
    C: Cost element is exempt cost element
    M: Minimum from actual + commitment and plan per order value update
    P: Plan value is not on the apportioned order / network
    B: Standard cost estimate for sales order or project stock
    S: Funds Commitment in Balance

You may see the attached note 178837 that describe in greater detail.

Sorry in standard system, there is no workaround to change this.

Best regards,
Miya


chengshiong_kwan
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Miya,

Thanks for your detailed explanation.

Have you come across anyone that has done enhancement in this area?

Thank you.

Rgds,

Sebastian

miya_wang
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hello Sebastian,

There were others before that have the same requirement to include revenue element in availability control, but I didn't see any solution here.

Best regards,
Miya

Answers (0)